Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:25:13.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Does Evolution Have To Do with Legal Enclaves?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Jesse Crane-Seeber  and
Betsy Crane
Jesse Crane-Seeber
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Betsy Crane
Affiliation:
Widener University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While we applaud Hudson, Bowen, and Nielson (2011) for demonstrating the correlation between two modes of contemporary sexist oppression (inequality in family law and violence against women), we are concerned about how they embed a contested narrative of human evolution into otherwise straightforward findings. We argue that claims about human evolution are unnecessary to their argument, and, more importantly, that the version of feminist evolutionary analysis they describe is less feminist than it could be.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 100 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crane-Seeber, Jesse, and Crane, Betsy. 2010. “Contesting Essentialist Theories of Patriarchal Relations: An Antidotal History of Gender.” Journal of Men's Studies 18 (3): 218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Bruce J., and Symons, Donald. 1990. “‘Sex’ Differences in Sexual Fantasy: An Evolutionary Psychological Approach.” The Journal of Sex Research 27 (4): 527–55.Google Scholar
Gallup, Gordon G. Jr., Burch, Rebecca L., Zappieri, Mary L., Parvez, Rizwan A., Stockwell, Malinda L., and Davis, Jennifer A.. 2003. “The Human Penis as a Semen Displacement Device.” Evolution and Human Behavior 24 (4): 277–89.Google Scholar
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer. 2000. “The Optimal Number of Fathers: Evolution, Demography, and History in the Shaping of Female Mate Preferences.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 907 (1): 75–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer. 2006. “Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female.” In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, ed. Sober, E.. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, Valerie M., Bowen, Donna Lee, and Nielsen, Perpetua Lynne, 2011. “What Is the Relationship between Inequity in Family Law and Violence against Women? Approaching the Issue of Legal Enclaves.” Politics & Gender 7 (4): 453–92.Google Scholar
McCaughey, Martha. 2008. The Caveman Mystique: Pop-Darwinism and the Debates over Sex, Violence, and Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parish, Amy R., De Waal, Frans B. M., and Haig, David. 2000. “The Other ‘Closest Living’ Relative: How Bonobos (Pan paniscus) Challenge Traditional Assumptions about Females, Dominance, Intra- and Intersexual Interactions, and Hominid Evolution.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 907 (1): 97–113.Google Scholar
Small, Meredith F. 1993. Female Choices: Sexual Behavior of Female Primates. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Small, Meredith F. 1995. What's Love Got To Do with It? The Evolution of Human Mating. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Small, Meredith F. 1998. Our Babies, Ourselves: How Biology and Culture Shape the Way We Parent. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Smuts, Barbara. 1995. “The Evolutionary Origins of Patriarchy.” Human Nature 6 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Trivers, Robert L. 1972. “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection.” In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, ed. Campbell, Bernard. Chicago: Aldine, 136–79.Google Scholar
Wood, Wendy, and Eagly, Alice H.. 2002. “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Differences.” Psychological Bulletin 128 (5): 699–727.Google Scholar
Yanca, Catherine, and Low, Bobbi S.. 2004. “Female Allies and Female Power: A Cross-Cultural Analysis.” Evolution and Human Behavior 25 (1): 9–23.Google Scholar