Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T14:19:29.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voting For Mom: The Political Consequences of Being a Parent for Male and Female Candidates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2010

Brittany L. Stalsburg
Brittany L. Stalsburg
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I explore the political consequences of being a parent for men and women seeking political office. Although a long-standing body of research has concluded that family obligations constrain the political careers of women but not of men, almost no research examines how family status can affect voter evaluations of political candidates. Using an experiment in which I varied the candidate's gender and parental status, I find that on a number of indicators, voters rate childless female candidates substantially lower than childless male candidates, mother candidates, and father candidates. Childless women also lose the traditional “female advantage” on child-care and children's issues. Additionally, while mothers of young children are not significantly disadvantaged compared to mothers of older children and women with no children, they are disadvantaged in comparison to male candidates with young children. Furthermore, this study finds evidence that male candidates may receive a “fatherhood penalty” compared to men with no children. Thus, there are political consequences of being a parent, but the consequences are dependent on the candidate's gender. These findings have important implications for candidate campaign strategy and how female candidates should think about presenting their family lives to voters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 373 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, Deborah, and Andersen, Kristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banducci, Susan, Everitt, Joanna, and Gidengil, Elisabeth. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes of Political Candidates: A Meta-Analysis.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Berlin.Google Scholar
Banwart, Mary Christine, Bystrom, Dianne G., and Robertson, Terry. 2003. “From the Primary to the General Election: A Comparative Analysis of Candidate Media Coverage in Mixed-Gender 2000 Races for Governor and U.S. Senate.” American Behavioral Scientist 46 (5): 658–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbara Lee Family Foundation. 2001. Keys to the Governor's Office: Unlock the Door: The Guide for Women Running for Governor. Brookline, MA: Barbara Lee Family Foundation.Google Scholar
Barbara Lee Family Foundation. 2004. Cracking the Code: Political Intelligence for Women Running for Governor. Brookline, MA: Barbara Lee Family Foundation.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Bennett, Linda. 1992. “From Traditional to Modern Conceptions of Gender Equality in Politics.” Western Political Quarterly 45 (1): 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Diane Kincaid, and Henry, Ann R.. 1981. “The Family Factor in State Legislative Turnover.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 6 (1): 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrom, Dianne G., Banwart, Mary Christine, Kincaid, Lynda Lee, and Robertson, Terry A.. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1989. “The Personal Is Political: The Intersection of Private Lives and Public Roles Among Women and Men in Elective and Appointive Office.” Women & Politics 9 (2): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J.. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. 2d ed.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Center for American Women, and Politics (CAWP). 2009. “Women in Elective Office 2009.” Fact Sheet. New Brunswick, NJ. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective09.pdf (Accessed June 2010).Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth A. 1994. “Voter Response to the Women Senate Candidates.” In Cook, Elizabeth A., Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde, eds., The Year of the Woman: Myths & Realities. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde, eds. 1994. The Year of the Woman Myths and Realities. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Critchlow, Donald T. 2005. Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: A Woman's Crusade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Cynthia R. 2006. Exposing Men: The Science and Politics of Male Reproduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darcy, R., Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. 2d ed.New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Davis, James Allan and Smith, Tom W.. General social surveys (GSS), 1972–2008. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
Devitt, James. 1999. “Framing Gender on the Campaign Trail: Women's Executive Leadership and the Press.” Washington, DC: Women's Leadership Fund.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2009. “Transgendering the Executive: The Politics of Gender and Executive Spouses.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, 67th annual conference, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 1997. “Change and Continuity in the Relationship between Private Responsibilities and Public Officeholding: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 569–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen.. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen.. 2005. “Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issue Priorities on Campaign Websites.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (1): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen.. 2008. “Is there a ‘gender affinity effect’ in American politics? Information, Affect, and Candidate Sex in U.S. House Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 1997. “Reconceiving Theories of Power: Consequences of Masculinism in the Executive Branch.” In The Other Elites: Women, Politics, and Power in the Executive Branch, ed. Borrelli, MaryAnne and Martin, Janet M.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Elder, Laurel. 2004. “Why Women Don't Run: Explaining Women's Underrepresentation in America's Political Institutions.” Women & Politics 26 (2): 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Steven. 2007. “The Rise of Politicized Moms and Dads: Media Coverage of Parenthood during Presidential Elections, 1952–2004.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Steven. 2008. “Parenthood and the Gender Gap.” In Voting the Gender Gap, ed. Whitaker, Lois Duke. Urbana, Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press: 2008: 119–40.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Smith, Eric R. A. N.. 1998. “The Role of Candidate Sex in Voter Decision-Making.” Political Psychology 19 (2): 405–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Jo. 1993. “Feminism vs. Family Values: Women at the 1992 Democratic and Republican Conventions.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (1): 21–28.Google Scholar
Fulton, Sarah A., Maestas, Cherie D., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heldman, Caroline, Carroll, Susan J., and Olson, Stephanie. 2005. “She Brought Only a Skirt: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole's Bid for the Republican Presidential Nomination.” Political Communication 22: 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993a. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993b. “The Consequences for Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1995. Beyond the Double Bind. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
King, David C., and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Jeane. 1974. Political Woman. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 1999. “Candidate Gender and Assessments of Senate Candidates.” Social Science Quarterly 80 (1): 84–96.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W.. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations?” Journal of Politics 62 (May): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard Logan. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Regina G., and Rose, Melody. 2010. Hillary Clinton's Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Lynne Rienner. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1985. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Paolino, Philip O. 1995. “Group Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 294–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center, The. 2008. “Revisiting the Mommy Wars After Palin: Politics, Gender and Parenthood.” Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center, The. 2007. “As Marriage and Parenthood Drift Apart, Public Is Concerned about Social Impact.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Philpot, Tasha S., and Walton, Hanes Jr. 2007. “One of Our Own: Black Female Candidates and the Voters Who Support Them.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Seale, Jana. 1988. “Attitudes Towards a Hypothetical Male of Female Presidential Candidates—A Research Note.” Political Psychology 9 (4): 591–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacco, Jennifer Schenk. 2007. “How the Public Evaluates Candidates' Messages about Family and Gender Roles.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of Western Political Science Association, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981/1982. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were A Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 3 (1/2): 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia.. 1982. “Private Costs of Public Commitments or Public Costs of Private Commitments? Family Roles versus Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Sigelman, Carol K., 1982. “Racism, Sexism, and Ageism in Voting Behavior: An Experimental Analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 45 (December): 263–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoper, Emily. 1977. “Wife and Politician: Role Strain Among Women in Public Office.” In Portrait of Marginality: The Political Behavior of the American Woman, ed. Githens, Marianne and Prestage, Jewel Limar. New York: McKay, 320–37.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 2002. “The Personal Is the Political: Antecedents of Gendered Choices of Elected Representatives.” Sex Roles 47 (7/8): 343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue.. N.d. “Women as Leaders in State Legislatures.” In Gender and Women's Leadership: A Reference Handbook, ed. O'Connor, Karen. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Witt, Linda, Paget, Karen M., and Matthews, Glenna. 1995. Running as A Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar