Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:08:24.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Legislator Experiences of Family-Friendly Working Practices in Political Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2016

Peter Allen ,
David Cutts  and
Madelaine Winn
Peter Allen
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
David Cutts
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Madelaine Winn
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Family-friendly (FF) working practices in political institutions have attracted scant attention from scholars, arguably reflecting the scarcity of their implementation. Using a survey of legislators and qualitative interviews, we examine for the first time how satisfied elected members of two new legislatures (the Welsh Assembly and the Scottish Parliament) are with FF working practices. We offer four possible explanations—parenthood, age of the legislator, sex, and the distance between the legislator's constituency and the legislature—for the variation in satisfaction. Our findings suggest that being a woman and having a greater distance between legislature and constituency exerted significant negative effects on legislators' satisfaction with FF working practices. In contrast, legislators over age 60 were significantly more likely to be satisfied with FF working practices in the new legislatures. We conclude by outlining future research avenues for comparative scholars of gender and politics interested in the effectiveness and resilience of FF working practices, in particular highlighting the importance of looking beyond the parent–child caring relationship to other caring and domestic obligations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 549 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arter, David. 2004. The Scottish Parliament: A Scandinavian-Style Assembly? London: Frank Cass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacchi, Carol, and Rönnblom, Malin. 2014. “Feminist Discursive Institutionalism—A Poststructural Alternative.” NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 22 (3): 170–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballington, Julie. 2009. “Gender Sensitive Parliaments.” In Is Parliament Open to Women? An Appraisal. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union, 81–83.Google Scholar
Barnett, Rosalind C. 1999. “A New Work-Life Model for the Twenty-First Century.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 562: 143–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bold, Valentina. 2007. “‘Lords o’ State’ and ‘Lusty Banquetting’: Images of Scotland from 1999–2003.” In Culture, Nation, and the New Scottish Parliament, ed. McCracken-Flesher, Caroline. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 199–214.Google Scholar
Budd, John W., and Mumford, Karen A.. 2006. “Family-Friendly Work Practices in Britain: Availability and Perceived Accessibility.” Human Resource Management 45 (1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Rosie, and Childs, Sarah. 2014. “Parents in Parliament: ‘Where's Mum?’” The Political Quarterly 84 (4): 487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, Paul. 2004. “The Post-Devolution Equality Agenda: The Case of the Welsh Assembly's Statutory Duty to Promote Equality of Opportunity.” Policy & Politics 32 (1): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, Paul, Mackay, Fiona, and McAllister, Laura. 2007. Women, Politics and Constitutional Change: The First Years of the National Assembly for Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise, and Waylen, Georgina. 2014. “Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions.” Public Administration 91 (3): 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Christine, and Tavits, Margit. 2011. “Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 460–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Cowley, Philip. 2011. “The Politics of Local Presence: Is There a Case for Descriptive Representation?” Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Hillevi. 2009. “Gender Sensitive Parliaments: The Swedish Case.” In Is Parliament Open to Women? An Appraisal. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union, 84–85.Google Scholar
Fagan, Collette. 2001. “Time, Money and the Gender Order: Work Orientations and Working-Time Preferences in Britain.” Gender, Work & Organization 8 (3): 239–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Forman, F. N. 2002. Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2005. “Making Hay … or Clutching at Ontological Straws? Notes on Realism, ‘As-If-Realism’ and Actualism.” Politics 25 (1): 951–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Christine, and Harker, Lisa. 1992. The Family-Friendly Employer: Examples from Europe. London: Daycare Trust.Google Scholar
House of Commons Procedure Committee. 2012. Sitting Hours and the Parliamentary Calendar: First Report of Session 2012–13. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Kan, Man Yee, Sullivan, Oriel, and Gershuny, Jonathan. 2011. “Gender Convergence in Domestic Work: Discerning the Effects of Interactional and Institutional Barriers from Large-Scale Data.” Sociology 45 (2): 234–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Meryl. 2013. Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. “Beyond Supply and Demand: A Feminist-Institutionalist Theory of Candidate Selection.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 707–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Mackay, Fiona, eds. 2011. Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2012. Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York City: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes A Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Suzan. 1997. “‘Family Friendly’ Employment Policies: A Route to Changing Organizational Culture or Playing About at the Margins?” Gender, Work & Organization 4 (1): 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2012a. “Feminising British Politics.” The Political Quarterly 83 (4): 697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2012b. “Prime Minister's Questions as Political Ritual.” British Politics 7 (4): 314–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, Dawn, and Woodward, Alison. 2004. “Gender and Time at the Top: Cultural Constructions of Time in High-Level Careers and Homes.” European Journal of Women's Studies 11 (2): 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2001. Love and Politics: Women Politicians and the Ethics of Care. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona, Kenny, Meryl, and Chappell, Louise. 2010. “New Institutionalism through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?” International Political Science Review 31 (5): 573–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Fiona, and McAllister, Laura. 2012. “Feminising British Politics: Six Lessons from Devolution in Scotland and Wales.” The Political Quarterly 83 (4): 730–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestas, Cherie, Neeley, Grant W., and Richardson, Lilliard E. Jr. 2003. “The State of Surveying Legislators: Dilemmas and Suggestions.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3 (1): 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, Laura. 2000. “The New Politics in Wales: Rhetoric or Reality?” Parliamentary Affairs 53 (3): 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, David S. 2013. “‘Tissue on the Bones’: Towards the Development of a Post-Structuralist Institutionalism.” Politics 33 (2): 112–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, Philip. 1994. “The Growth of the Constituency Role of the MP.” Parliamentary Affairs 47 (4): 705–20.Google Scholar
Office of National Statistics (United Kingdom). 2013. Measuring National Well-Being—What We Do. London: Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence: Political Representation of Gender Race and Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Puwar, Nirmal. 2004. Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Raymond, Leigh, Weldon, Laurel S., Kelly, Daniel, Arriaga, Ximena B., and Clark, Ann Marie. 2014. “Making Change: Norm-Based Strategies for Institutional Change to Address Intractable Problems.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Karen. 2002. “Women's Place in ‘Male’ Space: Gender and Effect in Parliamentary Contexts.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Meg, Mackay, Fiona, and McAllister, Laura. 2002. “Women's Representation in the Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales: Party Dynamics for Achieving Critical Mass.” Journal of Legislative Studies 8 (2): 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2000. “Parliamentary Representation of Women: From Discourses of Justice to Strategies of Accountability.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 361–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald. 1985. “The Role of the Good Constituency Member and the Practice of Representation in Great Britain.” Journal of Politics 47 (2): 348–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2009. “What Can Historical Institutionalism Offer Feminist Institutionalists?” Politics & Gender 5 (2): 245–53.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Allen supplementary material

Online abstract

Download Allen supplementary material(File)
File 14.3 KB