Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:17:54.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Qualitative Methodology around Masculinity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2018

Janet Elise Johnson  and
Darren Rosenblum
Janet Elise Johnson
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Darren Rosenblum
Affiliation:
Pace Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Given the predominance of men among elites, it is remarkable how little scholarship there is on the challenges of qualitative empirical work on elite men, especially work that interrogates the intersection of gender and class. We have both sought to include elite men as subjects, noting that the gender of our subjects, their social power, and our own gender performance have played a central role in defining our efficacy as researchers. Darren has researched top French corporate boards (e.g., Rosenblum and Roithmayr 2015). Janet has researched male dominance in the politics of Iceland and Russia (e.g., Johnson 2016; Johnson, Einarsdóttir, and Pétursdóttir 2013). This essay elaborates the challenges in researching elite men and explores the tactics we developed in response to the dynamic gender performances in the interviews, bringing Darren's insights as a legal scholar looking at economic elites to questions about male overrepresentation in politics.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 288 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bjarnegård, Elin. 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gnarr, Jón. 2015. “Column: The Bully.” Iceland Magazine, September 26. http://icelandmag.visir.is/article/jon-gnarrs-column-bully (accessed March 22, 2018).Google Scholar
Johnson, Janet Elise. 2009. “Unwilling Participant Observation among Russian Siloviki and the Good-Enough Field Researcher.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (2): 321–24.Google Scholar
Johnson, Janet Elise. 2016. “Fast-Tracked or Boxed In? Informal Politics, Gender, and Women's Representation in Putin's Russia.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (3): 643–59.Google Scholar
Johnson, Janet Elise, Einarsdóttir, Þorgerður, and Pétursdóttir, Gyða Margrét. 2013. “A Feminist Theory of Corruption: Lessons from Iceland.” Politics & Gender 9 (2): 174–206.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, Robin M. 2010. The Art of the Gut: Manhood, Power, and Ethics in Japanese Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, Alena. 2011. “Open Secrets and Knowing Smiles.” East European Politics and Societies 25 (4): 720–36.Google Scholar
Mikecz, Robert. 2012. “Interviewing Elites: Addressing Methodological Issues.” Qualitative Inquiry 18 (6): 482–93.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Darren, and Roithmayr, Daria. 2015. “More than a Woman: Insights into Corporate Governance after the French Sex Quota.” Indiana Law Review 48 (3): 889–930.Google Scholar