Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:32:29.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(Re)integrating Feminist Security Studies and Feminist Global Political Economy: Continuing the Conversation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

Amanda Chisholm
Affiliation:
Newcastle University
Saskia Stachowitsch
Affiliation:
University of Vienna and Austrian Institute for International Affairs

Extract

Considerations to integrate feminist security studies (FSS) and global political economy (GPE) were first systematically reflected in the Critical Perspectives section of the June 2015 issue of this journal. That collection presented engaging essays on how the divide between the two fields has evolved and ways we can seek to overcome it—or, indeed, whether we should attempt to bridge the divide. This debate has gained momentum in workshops and conference panels attempting to build bridges between the two feminist subfields. Given the richness of scholarship associated with the two fields, we aim to continue this productive conversation by bringing new voices and ideas into the debate and by engaging in further possibilities for theoretical, methodological, and empirical advancement that allow for a more comprehensive approach to global gendered inequalities and hierarchies—one that is not disciplined by academic boundaries. With this, we hope to challenge the constructed and sometimes violently sustained borders between public and private, domestic and international, political and economic, Global North and Global South, as well as disciplinary “camp structures” (Parashar 2013) that too often shape academic, and also feminist, knowledge production.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, Katherine. 2015. “Feminist Security Studies and Feminist International Political Economy: Considering Feminist Stories.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 430–34.Google Scholar
Elias, Juanita. 2015. “Introduction: Feminist Security Studies and Feminist Political Economy: Crossing Divides and Rebuilding Bridges.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 406–8.Google Scholar
Elias, Juanita, and Roberts, Adrienne. 2016. “Feminist Global Political Economies of the Everyday: From Bananas to Bingo.” Globalizations 13 (6): 787800.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
LeBaron, Genevieve. 2014. “Unfree Labour beyond Binaries: Social Hierarchy, Insecurity and Labour Market Restructuring.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 34 (5): 119.Google Scholar
Lobasz, Jennifer, and Sjoberg, Laura, eds. 2011. “Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics: The State of Feminist Security Studies: A Conversation.” Politics & Gender 4 (4): 573604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parashar, Swati. 2013. “Feminist (In)securities and Camp Politics.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 440–43.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. 2012. “Rethinking Theory: Inequalities, Informalization and Feminist Quandaries.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 14 (1): 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2015. “From Unity to Divergence and Back Again: Security and Economy in Feminist International Relations.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 408–13.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. Gender and International Relations. Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wibben, Annick T. R. 2011. “Feminist Politics in Feminist Security Studies.” Politics & Gender 7 (4): 590–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar