Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-j4qg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:02:35.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Historical Perspectives in Comparative Politics and Gender Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2007

Aili Mari Tripp
Aili Mari Tripp
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historical perspectives form the backdrop and the context for much work on gender in comparative politics scholarship, yet history itself has rarely been incorporated as the lens through which the theorizing of gender occurs. The current growth of interest in gender studies in American political development is strangely not reflected in contemporary trends of historical institutionalism within comparative politics (see Gretchen Ritter's essay in this issue). Although scholars of comparative politics working on gender or women almost always incorporate historical perspectives in their analyses, history is generally drawn on as background or to provide context. History itself is generally not the primary focus of their analysis and historical processes are not used to generate theory. It has been only recently that scholars, especially in the field of historical institutionalism (HI), have begun to think about new ways in which history could be used to develop theory and create new empirical knowledge in the field of comparative politics and gender.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 397 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldez, Lisa. 2002. Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter, eds. 2003. Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beissinger, Mark. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet Union. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, Daniel. 2007. “Ideas and Institutional Change in Social Security: Conversion, Layering, and Policy Drift.” Social Service Quarterly 88 (1): 20–38.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Susan. 2004. Women and the State in Modern Indonesia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri. 2004. “Inclusion and Democratization: Class, Gender, Race and the Extension of Suffrage.” Comparative Politics 36 (4): 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charrad, Mounira. 2001. States and Women's Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, ed. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2005. Women and Politics in Chile. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Kligman, Gail. 2000. Politics of Gender After Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Anne Marie, ed. 1997. Getting Institutions Right for Women in Development. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Hassim, Shireen. 2006. Women's Organizations and Democracy in South Africa: Contesting Authority. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa,. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. “Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics.” 1997. In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 81–112.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2005a. Politicizing Representation: Campaigns for Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2005b. “Embedded Reform: Legal Setbacks and Candidate Gender Quotas in France and the United Kingdom.” Paper presented at the Political Studies Association Women and Politics Conference, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, ed. 2005. State Feminism and Political Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride Stetson, Dorothy, and Mazur, Amy, eds. 1995. Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann. 1996. “Gender in the Welfare State,” American Review of Sociology 22: 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review, 94 (2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco O., et al. 1997. “The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women's Suffrage Rights, 1890 to 1990.” American Sociological Review 67 (October): 735–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 1999. Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siim, Birte. 2000. Gender and Citizenship: Politics and Agency in France, Britain and Denmark. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank eds. 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. “Letter from the President: Comparative Politics and Sociology, Love Lost and Regained,” APSA-CP, Newsletter 18 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutionalism Evolves: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, eds. Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, James. New York: Cambridge University Press, 208–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Louise A. 1989. “Gender, Women's History, and Social History,” Social Science History 13 (4): 439–62.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari, and Kang, Alice. Forthcoming. “The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation,” Comparative Political Studies.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2003. Gender, Globalization, and Postsocialism: The Czech Republic After Communism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 1994. “Women and Democratization: Conceptualising Gender Relations in Transition Politics.” World Politics 46 (3): 327–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar