Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:55:01.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gendering State and Citizens' Attitudes toward Women's Roles: State Policy, Employment, and Religion in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2006

Lee Ann Banaszak
Lee Ann Banaszak
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores how the state genders citizens' attitudes toward women by examining differences between East and West Germany in gender role attitudes since unification. Compared to the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG), the German Democratic Republic (GDR) was a stronger supporter of women's employment, although the two countries did not differ greatly in their policies on women's roles within the family. Using four waves of the German Social Survey, I examine whether East–West differences in gender role attitudes are explained by: 1) institutional learning (socialization under a particular regime) or 2) compositional effects (variation in the distribution of causal factors, specifically women's employment or religious affiliation). Analyses suggest that both types of factors influenced East–West differences in gender role attitudes. Even when other characteristics are included in the model, East and West Germans continue to differ in their gender role attitudes. Women's employment and religiosity—both heavily influenced by GDR policies—continue to play a large role in determining gender role attitudes even 15 years after unification. The results suggest that gendered state policies are reflected in citizens' gender role attitudes both directly and through changes in the social characteristics of the population.The early stages of this research were supported in part by the Alexander von Humboldt Bundeskanzler Fellowship Program. I would like to thank Sarah Poggione, Maria Inclan, and Jonah Victor for their assistance in data management and analysis, and Marie Pierson for help in preparation of the final manuscript. I am also grateful to Eric Plutzer, Robert Rohrschneider, and the reviewers and editors of Politics & Gender for their suggestions and comments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 29 - 55
Copyright
© 2006 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Andersen, Kristi, and Elizabeth Cook. 1985. “Women, Work, and Political Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (3): 606–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher, and Kathleen O'Connor. 2000. “System Change, Learning, and Public Opinion about the Economy.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (1): 147–172.Google Scholar
Ausschuss der deutschen Statistiker für die Volks- und Berufszählung 1946, 1949. Volks- und Berufszählung vom 29. Oktober 1946 in den vier Besatzungszonen und Gross-Berlin. Volkszählung: Tabellenteil. Berlin-Munich: Duncker & Humblot. (Microfilm from Research Publications, Inc., Woodbridge, CT).
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 1998. “East–West Differences in German Abortion Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (4): 545–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann, and Eric Plutzer. 1993a. “Contextual Determinants of Feminist Attitudes: National and Subnational Influences in Western Europe.” American Political Science Review 87 (March): 147–57.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann, and Eric Plutzer. 1993b. “The Social Bases of Feminism in Europe.” Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (1): 29–53.Google Scholar
Bauer, Petra. 1991. “Politische Orientierungen im Uebergang: Eine Analyse politischer Einstellungen der Bürger in West- und Ostdeutschland 1990/1991.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 43 (3): 433–53.Google Scholar
Bauer-Kaase, Petra. 1994. “Germany in Transition: The Challenge of Coping with Unification.” In German Unification: Process and Outcomes, ed. M. Donald Hancock and Helga Welsh. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 285–311.
Bundesministerium für Jugend, Familie, Frauen und Gesundheit, eds. 1989. Frauen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bonn.
Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dalton, Russell J. 1994. “Communists and Democrats: Democratic Attitudes in the Two Germanys.” British Journal of Political Science 24 (4): 469–93.Google Scholar
Davis, Nancy J., and Robert Robinson. 1991. “Men's and Women's Consciousness of Gender Inequality.” American Sociological Review 56 (1): 72–84.Google Scholar
Dölling, Irene. 1990. “Frauen- und Männerbilder: Eine Analyse von Fotos in DDR-Zeitschriften.” Feministische Studien 8 (May): 35–49.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Barbara. 1993. Cinderella Goes to Market: Citizenship, Gender and Women's Movements in East Central Europe. London: Verso.
Erikson, Susan L. 2003. “Post-diagnostic Abortion in Germany: Reproduction Gone Awry, Again?” Social Science and Medicine 56 (9): 1987–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 1993. “The Rise and Fall of Mommy Politics: Feminism and Unification in (East) Germany.” Feminist Studies 19 (1): 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finifter, Ada W. 1996. “Attitudes toward Individual Responsibility and Political Reform in the Former Soviet Union.” American Political Science Review 90 (1): 138–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finifter, Ada W., and Ellen Mickiewicz. 1992. “Refining the Political System of the USSR: Mass Support for Political Change.” American Political Science Review 86 (December): 857–74.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Gail Kligman. 2000a. The Politics of Gender after Socialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gal, Susan, and Gail Kligman, eds. 2000b. Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics and Everyday Life after Socialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Geissler, Rainer. 1991. “Soziale Ungleichheit zwischen Frauen und Maenner im geteilten und im vereinten Deutschland.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte. 1991 (B14–15): 13–24.Google Scholar
Gerson, Kathleen. 1985. Hard Choices: How Women Decide About Work, Career and Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gibson, James L., and Raymond Duch. 1993. “Emerging Democratic Values in Soviet Political Culture.” In Public Opinion and Regime Change: The New Politics of Post-Soviet Societies, ed. Arthur Miller, William Reisinger, and Vicki Hesli. Boulder, CO: Westview, 69–94.
Hampele, Anne. 1991. “Der Unabhängige Frauenverband.” In Von der Illegalität ins Parlament: Werdegang und Konzept der neuen Bürgerbewegungen, ed. Helmut Müller-Enbergs, Marianne Schulz, and Jan Wielgohs. Berlin: LinksDruck, 221–82.
Hayes, Bernadette C. 1995. “Religious Identification and Moral Attitudes: The British Case.” British Journal of Sociology 46 (3): 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacquette, Jane, and Sharon Wolchik, eds. 1998. Women and Democracy: Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Jelen, Ted, and Clyde Wilcox. 1998. “Context and Conscience: The Catholic Church as an Agent of Political Socialization in Western Europe.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37 (1): 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Ethel. 1984. Gender Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Klein, Ethel. 1987. “The Diffusion of Consciousness in the United States and Western Europe.” In The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe, ed. Mary Fainsod Katzenstein and Carol McClurg Mueller. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 23–43.
Klein, Markus. 1993. “Die Rolle der Frau im geteilten Deutschland.” Politische Vierteljahreschrift 34 (2): 272–97.Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Eva. 1993. Women in Contemporary Germany: Life, Work and Politics. Oxford, UK: Berg.
Liao, Tim Futing, and Yang Cai. 1995. “Socialization, Life Situations and Gender-Role Attitudes Regarding the Family among White American Women.” Sociological Perspectives 38 (2): 241–60.Google Scholar
Mason, David S. 1995. “Attitudes toward the Market and Political Participation in Postcommunist States.” Slavic Review 54 (2): 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, Ina. 1991–92. “Another Kind of Woman.” German Politics and Society 24/25 (Winter): 1–9.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Vicki Hesli, and W. Reisinger. 1994. “Reassessing Mass Support for Political and Economic Change in the Former USSR.” American Political Science Review 88 (2): 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Vicki Hesli, and W. Reisinger. 1996. “Understanding Political Change in Post-Soviet Societies: A Further Commentary on Finifter and Mickiewicz.” American Political Science Review 90 (1): 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur, William Reisinger, and Vicki Hesli, eds. 1993. Public Opinion and Regime Change: The New Politics of Post-Soviet Societies. Boulder, CO: Westview.
OECD. 1995. Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD.
Plutzer, Eric. 1988. “Work Life, Family Life, and Women's Support of Feminism.” American Sociological Review 53 (4): 640–49.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 1991. “Preferences in Family Politics: Women's Consciousness or Family Context?” Political Geography Quarterly 10 (April): 162–73.Google Scholar
“Programm des UFV.” 1990. In Aufbruch! Frauenbewegung in der DDR: Dokumentation, ed. Cordula Kahlau. Munich: Frauenoffensive, 67–77.
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1994. “Report from the Laboratory: The Influence of Institutions on Political Elites' Democratic Values in Germany.” American Political Science Review 88 (4): 927–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1996a. “Institutional Learning versus Value Diffusion: The Evolution of Democratic Values among Parliamentarians in Eastern and Western Germany.” Journal of Politics 58 (2): 422–46.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1996b. “Pluralism, Conflict, and Legislative Elites in United Germany.” Comparative Politics 29 (October): 43–67.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1996c. “Cultural Transmission versus Perceptions of the Economy: The Sources of Political Elites' Economic Values in the United Germany.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (February): 78–104.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1999. Learning Democracy: Democratic and Economic Values in Unified Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rose, Richard, and Edward C. Page. 1996. “German Responses to Regime Change: Culture, Class, Economy or Context?” West European Politics 19 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Hedwig, Eileen Appelbaum, and Friederike Maier. 1990. “After German Unity: A Cloudier Outlook for Women.” Challenge. 33 (November–December): 33–40.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, ed. 1998. Women in the Politics of Postcommunist Eastern Europe. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, and Hanna Schissler. 1990. “Women in the Two Germanys.” German Studies Review 13 (Supplement): 71–85.Google Scholar
Scott, Jacqueline. 1998. “Generational Change in Attitudes towards Abortion: A Cross National Comparison.” European Sociological Review 14 (2): 177–90.Google Scholar
Scott, Jacqueline. 1999. “European Attitudes towards Maternal Employment.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 19 (9–11): 151–86.Google Scholar
Searing, Donald, Joel Schwartz, and Alden Lind. 1973. “The Structuring Principle: Political Socialization and Belief Systems.” American Political Science Review 67 (June): 415–32.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. 1990. “Whither Political Socialization Research? The Question of Persistence.” In Political Socialization, Citizenship Education, and Democracy, ed. Orit Ichilov. New York: Teachers College Press, 69–97.
Sears, David O., and Carolyn Funk. 1999. “Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions.” Journal of Politics 61 (February): 1–28.Google Scholar
Senatsverwaltung für Arbeit und Frauen. 1992. Arbeitslos, über 40, Weiblich. Berlin: Oktoberdruck.
Smith, Tom. 1985. “Working Wives and Women's Rights: The Connection between the Employment Status of Wives and the Feminist Attitudes of Husbands.” Sex Roles 12 (5/6): 501–8.Google Scholar
Thornton, Arland, Duane F. Alwin, and Donald Camburn. 1983. “Causes and Consequences of Sex-Role Attitudes and Attitude Change.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 211–27.Google Scholar
Van Hoven, Bettina, and Carmella Pfaffenbach. 2002. “Labour Markets in Transition: The Experiences of Women in Two Border Regions of East Germany.” GeoJournal 56 (4): 261–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, Linda J., Francis Goldscheider, and Christina Witsberger. 1986. “Nonfamily Living and the Erosion of Traditional Family Orientations among Young Adults.” American Sociological Review 51 (4): 541–54.Google Scholar
Wegener, Bernd. 1985. “Gibt es Sozialprestige?” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 14 (3): 209–35.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde. 1991. “The Causes and Consequences of Feminist Consciousness among West European Women.” Comparative Political Studies 23 (4): 519–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Ted Jelen. 1991. “The Effects of Employment and Religion on Women's Feminist Attitudes.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 1 (3): 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Gunnar, ed. 1990. Frauenreport '90. Berlin: Die Wirtschaft Verlag.
Wolchik, Sharon, and Alfred Meyer, eds. 1985. Women, State, and Party in Eastern Europe. Durham: Duke University Press.
Zelle, Carsten. 1998. “Factors Explaining the Increase in PDS Support After Unification.” In Stability and Change in German Elections, ed. Christopher J. Anderson and Carsten Zelle. New York: Praeger, 223–44.