Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:53:02.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women's Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2013

Melody Crowder-Meyer
Melody Crowder-Meyer*
Affiliation:
Sewanee: The University of the South
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Do strong and active political parties enhance women's representation, or do they contribute to the ongoing inequality in men's and women's candidacy rates? Studies have examined this question by looking at a variety of measures of party strength, focusing particularly on the role parties play in candidate emergence. For qualified individuals in the pool of potential candidates, being encouraged to run for office by a political actor is the most important step in considering a candidacy (Lawless and Fox 2005). Such encouragement is especially important in increasing the typically lower political ambition among women in the candidate pool (Fox and Lawless 2010). Yet the limited research examining the effects of party recruitment on men's and women's candidacies finds negative (Niven 1998; 2006) or no (Sanbonmatsu 2006) effects of recruitment on women's representation. Some studies even find evidence that parties more often run female than male candidates as “sacrificial lambs” in unwinnable races (Carroll 1994; Stambough and O'Regan 2007).

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 390 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baer, Denise L. 1993. “Political Parties: The Missing Variable in Women and Politics Research.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 547–76.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–97.Google Scholar
Bibby, John. 1999. “State and Local Parties in a Candidate-Centered Age.” In American State and Local Politics: Directions for the 21st Century, eds. Weber, Ronald E. and Brace, Paul. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Black, Gordon. 1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.” American Political Science Review 66 (1): 144–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bledsoe, Timothy, and Herring, Mary. 1990. “Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Boef, Suzanna De, and Lin, Tse-Min. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98 (3): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, Charles S. III, and MacManus, Susan. 1991. “Municipal Electoral Structure and the Election of Councilwomen.” Journal of Politics 53 (1): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J., ed. 2001. The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J., and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2010. “Entering the Mayor's Office: Women's Decisions to Run for Municipal Office. Presented at The Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Center for American Women and Politics. 2012. “Women in Elective Office 2012.” New Brunswick, NJ: Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective.pdf (Accessed June 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cotter, Cornelius, Gibson, James, Bibby, John, and Huckshorn, Robert. 1984. Party Organizations in American Politics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody A. 2008. National Survey of County Party Leaders. In possession of the author.Google Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody A.. 2010a. “Local Parties, Local Candidates, and Women's Representation: How County Parties Affect Who Runs for and Wins Political Office.” Ph.D. diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody A.. 2010b. “The Party's Still Going: County Party Strength, Activity, and Influence.” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties, eds. Green, John and Coffey, Daniel. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Darcy, Robert, Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. 2nd ed.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, Edith, and Heer, Wim De. 2002. “Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison. In Survey Nonresponse, eds. Groves, Robert, Dillman, Don, Eltinge, John, and Little, Roderick. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Deckman, Melissa. 2006. “Women at the School Board Level: Ideology, Party, and Policy Concerns.” Journal of Women, Politics, & Public Policy 28 (1): 87–117.Google Scholar
Dolan, Julie, Deckman, Melissa, and Swers, Michele. 2007. Women and Politics: Paths to Power and Political Influence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2006. “Symbolic Mobilization? The Impact of Candidate Sex in American Elections.” American Politics Research 34 (6): 687–704.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 1998. “The Bottleneck: Women Becoming Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elder, Laurel. 2012. “The Partisan Gap among Women State Legislators.” Journal of Women, Politics, & Policy 33 (1): 65–85.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Richard. 2004. Mayors and the Challenge of Urban Leadership. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard Logan. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2010. “If Only They'd Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition.” Journal of Politics 72 (2): 310–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Jo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101 (3): 327–56.Google Scholar
Fulton, Sarah, Maestas, Cherie, Stone, Walter, and Maisel, Sandy. 2004. “Gender and Progressive Ambition: Recasting the Calculus of Higher Office.” Presented at The Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hannagan, Rebecca, and Larimer, Christopher. 2011. “Assessing Gender Dynamics in Local Government: Results from a Statewide Field Experiment.” Presented at New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. 1997. “Talking About Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political Proselytizing.” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 73–103.Google Scholar
Hess, Frederick M. 2002. “School Boards at the Dawn of the 21st Century: Conditions and Challenges of District Governance.” National School Boards Association. http://www.nsba.org/Board-Leadership/Surveys/SchoolBoardsattheDawnofthe21stCentury.pdf (Accessed January 2013).Google Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 2001. “The Influence of State and District Conditions on the Representation of Women in U.S. State Legislatures.” American Politics Research 29 (1): 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.Google Scholar
International City/County Management Association. 2007. County Form of Government Survey. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kling, Kristen, Hyde, Janet, Showers, Carolin, and Buswell, Brenda. 1999. “Gender Differences in Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (4): 470–500.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marsden, Peter. 1988. “Homogeneity in Confiding Relations.” Social Networks 10 (1): 57–76.Google Scholar
Masket, Seth Everett. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, J. Miller, and Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 1986. “Sex Segregation in Voluntary Associations.” American Sociological Review 51 (1): 61–79.Google Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., Squire, Peverill, and Jewell, Malcom E.. 2001. Who Runs for the Legislature? Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., and Thompson, Joel. 1992. “Electoral Structure and State Legislative Representation: A Research Note.” Journal of Politics 54 (1): 246–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NACO. 2008. “County Government Overview.” National Association of Counties. http://www.naco.org/Content/NavigationMenu/About_Counties/County_Government/CountyOverview.pdf (Accessed November 2008).Google Scholar
NCES. 2012. “Digest of Education Statistics.” National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/Programs/digest/ (Accessed January 18, 2013).Google Scholar
Niven, David. 1998. The Missing Majority: The Recruitment of Women as State Legislative Candidates. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Niven, David. 2006. “Throwing Your Hat Out of the Ring: Negative Recruitment and the Gender Imbalance in State Legislative Candidacy.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 473–89.Google Scholar
NLC. “Partisan vs. Nonpartisan Elections.” National League of Cities. http://www.nlc.org/build-skills-and-networks/resources/cities-101/city-officials/partisan-vs-nonpartisan-elections (Accessed June 4, 2013).Google Scholar
Ondercin, Heather L., and Welch, Susan. 2009. “Comparing Predictors of Women's Congressional Election Success.” American Politics Research 37 (4): 593–613.Google Scholar
Pajares, Frank. 2002. “Gender and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Self-Regulated Learning.” Theory into Practice 41 (2): 116–25.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2001. “The Political Glass Ceiling: Gender, Strategy and Incumbency in U.S. House Elections, 1978−1998.” Women & Politics 23 (1/2): 59–78.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2006. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2000. “Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey.” Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/data_access/data/datasets/social_capital_community_survey.html (Accessed September 28, 2013).Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth, and Harrell, Jessica. 2010. “The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women's Political Engagement: Does Party Matter?” Political Research Quarterly 63 (2): 280–94.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Burns, Nancy, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. “Gender and the Pathways to Participation: The Role of Resources.” Journal of Politics 56 (4): 963–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adrienne R., Reingold, Beth, and Owens, Michael Leo. 2012. “The Political Determinants of Women's Descriptive Representation in Cities.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 315–29.Google Scholar
Stambough, Stephen, and O'Regan, Valerie. 2007. “Republican Lambs and the Democratic Pipeline: Partisan Differences in the Nomination of Female Gubernatorial Candidates.” Politics & Gender 3 (3): 349–68.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trounstine, Jessica, and Valdini, Melody Ellis. 2008. “The Context Matters: The Effects of Single-Member versus At-Large Districts on City Council Diversity.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 554–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Ronald E., and Brace, Paul. 1999. “States and Localities Transformed.” In American State and Local Politics: Directions for the 21st Century, eds. Weber, Ronald E. and Brace, Paul. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Studlar, Donley. 1990. “Multi-Member Districts and the Representation of Women: Evidence from Britain and the U.S.” Journal of Politics 52 (2): 391–412.Google Scholar