Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:50:14.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Politics in the Dominican Republic: Advances for Women, Ambivalence from Men

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2008

Jana Morgan ,
Rosario Espinal  and
Jonathan Hartlyn
Jana Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee
Rosario Espinal
Affiliation:
Temple University
Jonathan Hartlyn
Affiliation:
University of North Carolinaat Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A considerable body of research has analyzed the influence of the women's movement, changes in women's political representation, and policies promoting women's interests in the developing world. However, we know comparatively less about the degree to which the attitudes and behaviors of the mass public mirror these national patterns. This article explores the evolution of gender differences in citizens' political interest, civic engagement, and support for women in politics in the Dominican Republic over 1994–2004, a period important for the country's democratization as well as one of significant changes in gender-related discourse and policies. We find evidence of a shift from a traditional gender gap to a modern gender gap, but the explanations for changes in women's views are distinct from those of men. We find that sociostructural factors, particularly age and education, and cues from political elites have significantly different effects on men versus women. Women's levels of political interest and support for equality in political participation are more fixed in their youth, whereas men's levels evolve through middle age. The evidence also indicates that reducing the gender gap in political interest would significantly narrow gender differences in civic activism. Most notably, men appear to be more easily swayed by elite cues that favor or oppose women's political participation; women's support for equal participation is much less susceptible to reversals in elite support. The consolidation of advances in gender equity thus depends significantly on contextual factors such as elite discourse.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 35 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, Julia, and Orloff, Ann Shola. 2005. “Defending Modernity? High Politics, Feminist Anti-Modernism, and the Place of Gender.” Politics & Gender 1 (March): 166–82.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1040–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2002. Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2003. “Women's Movements and Democratic Transition in Brazil, Chile, East Germany and Poland.” Comparative Politics 35 (3): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann, and Plutzer, Eric. 1993. “The Social Bases of Feminism in the European Community.” Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (1): 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Janeen, and Kane, Emily W.. 1995. “Dependence and Independence: A Cross-National Analysis of Gender Inequality and Gender Attitudes.” Gender and Society 9 (2): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine I., and Myers, Daniel J.. 2004. “Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces 83 (2): 759–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E., Verba, Sidney, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, John, and Rahn, Wendy. 1997. “Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEDAW. 1998. Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Dominican Republic. United Nations Document A/53/38.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Gray, Virginia. 1983. Feminism and the New Right: Conflict Over the American Family. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cordero, Margarita. 1991. Mujer, Participación Política y Procesos Electorales, 1986 y 1990. Santo Domingo, DR: CIPAF.Google Scholar
Craske, Nikki, and Molyneux, Maxine, eds. 2002. Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Nancy J., and Robinson, Robert V.. 1991. “Men's and Women's Consciousness of Gender Inequality.” American Sociological Review 56 (February):72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Isis, Brea, Ramonina, Ramón, Tejada H., and Báez, Clara. 1996. Cultura Política y Democracia en República Dominicana. Santo Domingo, DR: PUCMM.Google Scholar
Espinal, Rosario. 2004. “Hombres con pantalmes.” Hoy Santo Domingo, DR. (May 15, 2004).Google Scholar
Espinal, Rosario. 2006. Democracia. Epiléptica en la Sociedad del Clic. Santo Domingo: Editora Clave.Google Scholar
Espinal, Rosario, Jonathan Hartlyn, and Jana Morgan, Kelly. 2006. “Performance Still Matters: Explaining Trust in Government in the Dominican Republic.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (2): 200–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Karl-Dieter, Opp. 1991. “Party Identification and Participation in Collective Action.” Journal of Politics 53 (2): 339–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Robert. 1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (4): 797–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, Joyce. 1989. Feminism and Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Diane, and Spohn, Cassia. 1987. “Adolescents' Attitudes Toward Women in Politics: The Effect of Gender and Race.” Gender and Society 1 (2): 208–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, Gómez, Julia, Carmen. 2005. Indice de Compromiso Cumplido: Un Instrumento de Control Ciudadano de la Equidad de Género. Santo Domingo, DR: Editora Buho.Google Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan. 1998. The Struggle for Democratic Politics in the Dominican Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Howell, Susan E., and Day, Christine L.. 2000. “Complexities of the Gender Gap.” Journal of Politics 62 (3): 858–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Jones, Mark P.. 2002. “Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Electoral Quotas and Women's Leadership in Latin America.” In Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Craske, Nikki and Molyneux, Maxine. Houndmills Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave, 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2005. “Modernization and Gender Equality: A Response to Adams and Orloff.” Politics & Gender 1 (September): 482–92.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane S., ed., 1991. The Women's Movement in Latin America: Feminism and the Transition to Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Jennings, Kent M. 1998. “Gender and Political Participation in the Chinese Countryside.” Journal of Politics 60 (4): 954–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez Polanco, Jacqueline. 2005. “La representación política de las mujeres en la República Dominicana: Obstaculos institucionales a su incorporación en los espacios de poder.” In Miradas Desencadenantes, ed. Candelario, Ginetta E. B.. Santo Domingo, DR: Intec, 305–33.Google Scholar
Klein, Ethel. 1984. Gender Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide.” Politics & Gender 2 (September): 303–27.Google Scholar
LaFont, Suzanne. 2001. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Women in the Post-communist States.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34 (2): 203–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macaulay, Fiona. 2006. Gender Politics in Brazil and Chile: The Role of Parties in National and Local Policymaking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manza, Jeff. 1998. “The Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections: When? Why? Implications?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (5): 1235–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Peter, Shin, Doh C., and Moisés, José Álvaro. 1998. “Democratization and Participation: Comparing Spain, Brazil and Korea.” Journal of Politics 60 (4): 919–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, Mercedes. 2005. “Legislative Reform and the Struggle to Eradicate Violence against Women in the Dominican Republic.” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 14 (1): 36–90.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 1991. “Preferences in Family Politics: Women's Consciousness or Family Context?” Political Geography Quarterly 10 (2): 162–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria. 2003. Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics. Austin: Texas University Press.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia, and Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1997. “The Variable Gender Basis of Electoral Politics: Gender and Context in the 1992 US Election.” British Journal of Political Science 27 (4): 497–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strate, John M., Parrish, Charles J., Elder, Charles D., and Ford, Coit. 1989. “Life Span Civic Development and Voting Participation.” American Political Science Review 83 (2): 443–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, E., Teresa, Ana María Muñoz B., and Alicia, Donoso O., eds. 2005. 1995–2003 Han Avanzado las Mujeres? Indice de Compromiso Cumplido Latinoamericano. Santiago de Chile: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2000. “Gender and Democratic Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Consolidation in Argentina and Chile.” Journal of Latin American Studies 32 (3): 765–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1975 “Support among Women for the Issues of the Women's Movement.” Sociological Quarterly 16 (2): 216–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar