Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:20:03.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gender Gap in Attitudes and Beliefs about the Place of Women in American Political Life: A Longitudinal, Cross-Generational Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2006

M. Kent Jennings
M. Kent Jennings
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Support for gender equality in the United States has gradually increased from the 1970s onward. Nonetheless, significant and varying gender gaps in this support become evident when we analyze public opinion over time and across generations. I utilize longitudinal survey data from national samples of three generations that came of age in the pre–women's movement era, during the era, and in the postmovement era, respectively. Three main indicators of attitudes about gender equality are employed and two types of gaps are formulated. Contemporaneous gender gaps—the differences between men and women at a given time—tended to increase over time and across succeeding generations. Longitudinal gaps, the differences in support between men and women across generations at different points in time, took the form of women becoming more liberal than men. Signs of growing resentment or ambivalence about gender equality among men appeared in the postmovement generation. A combination of generation and period effects accounts for these dynamics, the key factor being the interaction of gender with generational location and secular tides.The most recent support for the research reported here comes from the National Science Foundation and the Academic Senate of the University of California, Santa Barbara. I thank Lia Roberts and Kuang-hui Chen for their technical assistance. The data used here are available through the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research at the University of Michigan. An earlier version of this article was presented as a paper at the Dilemmas of Democracy Conference, Loyola Marymount University, 2003.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 193 - 219
Copyright
© 2006 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, Linda L. M., and Stephen E. Bennett. 1999. “Changing Views about Gender Equality in Politics: Gradual Change and Lingering Doubts.” In Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders? ed. Lois Duke Whitaker. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bolzendahl, Catherine I., and Daniel J. Myers. 2004. “Feminists Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces 83 (December): 759–90.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carroll, Susan J. 1989. “Gender Politics and the Socializing Impact of the Women's Movement.” In Political Learning in Adulthood, ed. Roberta S. Sigel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth. 1996. Feminism Is Not the Story of My Life: How Today's Feminist Elite Has Lost Touch with the Real Concerns of Women. New York: Nan A. Talese.
Gurin, Patricia. 1985. “Women's Gender Consciousness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (Summer): 143–63.Google Scholar
Gose, Ben. 1998. “More Freshmen Than Ever Appear Discouraged in Their Studies, Survey Finds.” Chronicle of Higher Education 44 (16 January), A37–39.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Francis K. Neely, and Marilyn R. Lafay. 2000. “The Polls—Trends: Support for the Women's Movement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (Summer): 309–50.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent. 2004. “Survey Research and Political Socialization.” In A Telescope on Society: Survey Research & Social Science at the University of Michigan and Beyond, ed. James S. House, F. Thomas Juster, Robert L. Kahn, Howard Schuman, and Eleanor Singers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Jennings, M. Kent, and Richard G. Niemi. 1965. The Political Character of Adolescence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kinder, Donald R., and Lynn M. Sanders. 1996. Divided by Color. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Klein, Ethel. 1984. Gender Politics: From Consciousness to Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leege, David C., Kenneth D. Wald, Brian S. Krueger, and Paul D. Mueller. 2002. The Politics of Cultural Differences: Social Change and Voter Mobilization Strategies in the Post–New Deal Period. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mannheim, Karl. [1928] 1972. “The Problem of Generations.” In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, ed. Paul Kecskemeti. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rinehart, Sue Tolleson. 1992. Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.
Rosenstone, Stephen J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1990. “The Women's Movement and the Creation of Gender Consciousness: Social Movements as Socialization Agents.” In Political Socialization, Citizenship Education, and Democracy, ed. Orit Ichilov. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Sears, David O. 1990. “Whither Political Socialization Research? The Question of Persistence.” In Political Socialization, Citizenship Education, and Democracy, ed. Orit Ichilov. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Democrats, Republicans and the Politics of Women's Place. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Schlesinger, Mark, and Caroline Heldman. 2001. “Gender Gap or Gender Gaps? New Perspectives on Support for Government Action and Policies.” Journal of Politics 63 (February): 59–92.Google Scholar
Sigel, Roberta S. 1996. Ambition and Accommodation: How Women View Gender Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2001. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2001. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.