Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:00:40.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forging Women's Substantive Representation: Intersectional Interests, Political Parity, and Pensions in Bolivia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2018

Christina Ewig
Christina Ewig*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lacking tools to measure substantive representation, empirical research to date has determined women’s substantive representation by identifying “women’s interests” a priori, with little attention to differences across race, class, or other inequalities. To address this problem, I develop the concept of intersectional interests and a method for identifying these. Intersectional interests represent multiple perspectives and are forged through a process of political intersectionality that purposefully includes historically marginalized perspectives. These interests can be parsed into three types: expansionist, integrationist, and reconceived. Identification of intersectional interests requires, first, an inductive mapping of the differing women’s perspectives that exist in a specific context and then an examination of the political processes that lead to these new, redefined interests. I demonstrate the concept of intersectional interests and how to identify these in Bolivia, where I focus on the political process of forging reconceived intersectional interests in Bolivia’s political parity and pension reforms.

Keywords

political representationwomen's substantive representationintersectionalityBoliviaLatin Americapolitical interestspensionspolitical parity
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 433 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Bianet Castellanos, Alex Huneeus, Helen Kinsella, William Jones, Lorena Muñoz, Susan Ridgely, and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback. I am grateful for a Vilas Associates Award from the University of Wisconsin–Madison that made this research possible, as well as for the women who agreed to be interviewed for this research.

References

REFERENCES

Albaine, Laura. 2009. “Cuotas de Género y Ciudadanía Política en Bolivia” [Gender quotas and political citizenship in Bolivia]. Margen55, no. 55: 1–10.Google Scholar
Albó, Xavier. 2002. “Bolivia: From Indian and Campesino Leaders to Councillors and Parliamentary Deputies.” In Multiculturalism in Latin America: Indigenous Rights, Diversity, and Democracy, ed. Sieder, Rachel. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 74–102.Google Scholar
Albó, Xavier. 2008. “The ‘Long Memory’ of Ethnicity in Bolivia and Some Temporary Oscillations.” In Unresolved Tensions: Bolivia Past and Present, eds. Crabtree, John and Whitehead, Laurence. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 13–34.Google Scholar
Aldunate, Victoria, and Paredes, Julieta. 2010. Construyendo Movimientos [Constructing movements]. La Paz: Solidaridad Internacional Bolivia.Google Scholar
Arza, Camila. 2012. “Pension Reform and Gender Equality in Latin America.” Research Paper 2012-2, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/search/3513162DF26920D5C12579CF0053534B?OpenDocument (accessed May 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2011. “The UN Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW): A New Way to Measure Women's Interests.” Politics & Gender 7 (3): 419–23.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2014. “Plotting the Path from One to the Other: Women's Interests and Political Representation.” In Representation: The Case of Women, eds. Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C. and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 19–40.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 97–125.Google Scholar
Burman, Anders. 2011. “Chachawarmi: Silence and Rival Voices on Decolonisation and Gender Politics in Andean Bolivia.” Journal of Latin American Studies 43 (1): 65–91.Google Scholar
Canessa, Andrew. 2005. “The Indian Within, the Indian Without: Citizenship, Race and Sex in a Bolivian Hamlet.” In Natives Making Nation: Gender, Indigeneity and the State in the Andes, ed. Canessa, Andrew. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 130–55.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 2001. “Representing Women: Women State Legislators as Agents of Change.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Carroll, Susan J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 3–21.Google Scholar
CEPALSTAT. 2017. “CEPAL Database.” 2017. http://estadisticas.cepal.org/cepalstat/WEB_CEPALSTAT/Portada.asp?idioma=i. (accessed July 1, 2017).Google Scholar
Choque Quispe, María Eugenia. 2009. Chacha Warmi: Imaginarios y Vivencias en El Alto [Chacha warmi: Imaginaries and experiences in El Alto]. La Paz: Gregoria Apaza.Google Scholar
Coordinadora de la Mujer. 2006. Mirando al Pasado Para Proyectarnos Al Futuro: Evaluación de Políticas Públicas de Género [Looking to the past to project ourselves to the future: Evaluation of gender public policies]. La Paz: Coordinadora de la Mujer.Google Scholar
Coordinadora de la Mujer. 2012a. Mujeres en Diágolo: Avanzando Hacia La Despatriarcalización [Women in dialogue: Advancing toward depatriarchalization]. La Paz: Coordinadora de la Mujer.Google Scholar
Coordinadora de la Mujer. 2012b. Sistematización de La Agenda Legislativa Desde Las Mujeres en Bolivia 2008–10 [Systematization of the legislative agenda from women in Bolivia 2008–10]. La Paz: Coordinadora de la Mujer.Google Scholar
Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly, and Langbein, Laura. 2009. “Linking Women's Descriptive and Substantive Representation in the United States.” Politics & Gender 5 (4): 491–518.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1988. “Race, Reform and Retrenchment, Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination Law.” Harvard Law Review 101 (7): 1331–87.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2014. “Representing Women: Defining Substantive Representation.” In Representation: The Case of Women, eds. Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C. and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 58–75.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, Marisol. 1996. “Las Mujeres Son Más Indias” [Women are more Indian]. In Detrás de La Puerta: Hombres y Mujeres en El Perú de Hoy [Behind the door: Women and men in Peru today], ed. Ruíz-Bravo, Patricia. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 181–202.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, Marisol. 2000. Indigenous Mestizos: The Politics of Race and Culture in Cuzco, 1919–1991. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Democracy Center. 2008. “Bolivian Racism Runs Amok in Sucre.” Blog from Bolivia (blog), May 26. https://democracyctr.org/bolivian-racism-runs-amok-in-sucre/ (accessed May 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Diamond, Irene, and Hartsock, Nancy. 1981. “Beyond Interests in Politics: A Comment on Virginia Sapiro's ‘When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.’” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 717–21.Google Scholar
Dunkerley, James. 1984. Rebellion in the Veins: Political Struggle in Bolivia, 1952–82. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ewig, Christina. 2010. Second-Wave Neoliberalism: Gender, Race and Health Sector Reform in Peru. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Ewig, Christina, and Ferree, Myra Marx. 2013. “Feminist Organizing: What's Old, What's New? History, Trends and Issues.” In The Oxford Handbook on Gender and Politics, eds. Waylen, Georgina, Celis, Karen, Kantola, Johanna, and Weldon, S. Laurel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 437–61.Google Scholar
Federación Departmental de Mujeres Campesinas Indígenas Originarias de la Paz “Bartolina Sisa.” 2010. Plan Estratégico Integral de Desarrollo 2009–2015 [Integral strategic development plan 2009–2015]. La Paz: Federación Departmental de Mujeres Campesinas Indígenas Originarias de la Paz “Bartolina Sisa.”Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 2003. “Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates of the United States and Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 109 (2): 304–44.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (3): 393–425.Google Scholar
Grey, Sandra. 2006. “The ‘New World’? The Substantive Representation of Women in New Zealand.” In Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study, eds. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon, and Trimble, Linda. New York: Routledge, 134–51.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2014. “Intersectional Representation or Reshaping Intersectionality? Reshaping Empirical Analysis of Intersectionality.” In Representation: The Case of Women, eds. Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C. and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 41–57.Google Scholar
Harris, Olivia. 1978. “Complementarity and Conflict: An Andean View of Women and Men.” In Sex and Age as Principles of Social Differentiation, ed. La Fontaine, Jean Sybil. New York: Academic Press, 21–40.Google Scholar
Hill Collins, Patricia. 1991. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist Theory from Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, Lacalle, Marina, and Micozzi, Juan Pablo. 2013. “Does Women's Presence Change Legislative Behavior? Evidence from Argentina, 1983–2007.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 5 (1): 95–125.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Ossa, Juan Pablo. 2013. “Political Inclusion of Marginalized Groups: Indigenous Reservations and Gender Parity in Bolivia.” Politics, Groups and Identities 1 (1): 4–25.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2010. Mujeres y Hombres de Bolivia en Cifras [Bolivian women and men in statistics]. La Paz: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. n.d. “Women in Parliaments: World Classification (Statistical Archive).” http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif-arc.htm (accessed July 20, 2017).Google Scholar
Jónasdóttir, Anna G. 1988. “On the Concept of Interest, Women's Interests and the Limitations of Interest Theory.” In The Political Interests of Gender: Developing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face, eds. Jones, Kathleen B. and Jónasdóttir, Anna G.. London: Sage, 33–65.Google Scholar
La Prensa. 2010. “Posible Nueva Ley de Imprenta Genera Diferencias en El MAS” [Possible new press law generates conflict in the MAS]. September 27.Google Scholar
López, Graciela Raquel. 2011. Reflexiones y Propuestas Sobre El Régimen Laboral y de Seguridad Social Con Perspectiva de Género [Reflections and proposals on the labor and social security regime with a gender perspective]. Cuaderno de Trabajo 17. La Paz: Red Boliviana De Mujeres Transformando la Economía.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
Marco Navarro, Flavia. 2010. “De la Exclusión a la Incertidumbre: El Sistema de Pensiones en Bolivia y su Inminente Reforma” [From exclusion to uncertainty: The pension system in Bolivia and its imminent reform]. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Trabajo [Latin American journal of labor studies] 15 (23–24): 137–50.Google Scholar
Mayorga, Fernando. 2011. Dilemas: Ensayos Sobre Democracia Intercultural y Estado Plurinacional [Dilemmas: Essays on intercultural democracy and the plurinational state]. La Paz: Centro de Estudios Superiores Universitarios, Universidad Mayor de San Simon y Plural Editores.Google Scholar
Mesa Lago, Carmelo. 2014. “Reversing Pension Privatization: The Experience of Argentina, Bolivia, Chile and Hungary.” Working Paper 44, ESS Extension of Social Security, International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1991. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, eds. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Russo, Ann, and Torres, Lourdes. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 51–80.Google Scholar
Monasterios, P. Karin. 2007. “Bolivian Women's Organizations in the MAS Era.” NACLA Report on the Americas 40 (2): 33–37.Google Scholar
Mujeres Presentes en la Historia. 2006. De La Propuesta al Mandato: Una Propuesta En Construcción [From proposal to mandate: A proposal under construction]. La Paz: Proyecto Mujeres y Asamblea Constituyente.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions and Third World Feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Navarro, Marysa. 2002. “Against Marianismo.” In Gender's Place: Feminist Anthropologies of Latin America, eds. Montoya, Rosario, Frazier, Lessie Jo, and Hurtig, Janise. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 257–72.Google Scholar
Novillo Gonzáles, Mónica. 2011. Paso a Paso Así Lo Hicimos: Avances y Desafíos En La Participación Política de Las Mujeres [Step by step we did it: Advances and challenges in women's political participation]. La Paz: Coordinadora de la Mujer and Instituto Internacional para la Democracia y la Asistencias Electoral.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Poggione, Sarah. 2004. “Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 305–14.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2008. “Women as Office Holders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” In Political Women and American Democracy, eds. Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa. New York: Cambridge University Press, 128–47.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Stéphanie. 2011. “Indigenous and Feminist Movements at the Constituent Assembly in Bolivia: Locating the Representation of Indigenous Women.” Latin American Research Review 46 (2): 5–28.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Stéphanie, and Ewig, Christina. 2017. “Latin America's Left-Turn and the Political Empowerment of Indigenous Women.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 24 (4): 425–51.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Nancy. 1991. “The Hour of Eugenics”: Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Evelyn P. 1973. “Marianismo: The Other Face of Machismo in Latin America.” In Female and Male In Latin America, ed. Pescatello, Ann. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 89–101.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Toranzo Roca, Carlos. 2008. “Let the Mestizos Stand Up and Be Counted.” In Unresolved Tensions: Bolivia Past and Present, eds. Crabtree, John and Whitehead, Laurence. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 35–50.Google Scholar
Uriona Crespo, Pilar. 2009. Los Caminos a La Paridad: Mujeres Participación y Representación en El Proceso Post Constituyente [Paths to parity: Women's participation and representation in the post-constituent process]. La Paz: Instituto Internacional para la Democracia y la Asistencia Electoral and Coordinadora de la Mujer.Google Scholar
Uriona Crespo, Pilar. 2010. De La Presencia a La Autodeterminación: Género en Los Procesos Electorales 2009 y 2010 [From presence to autodetermination: Gender in the electoral processes of 2009 and 2010]. La Paz: ONU Mujeres en Bolivia.Google Scholar
Viceministerio de Asuntos de Género y Generacionales. 2007. Mujeres Constituyentes [Women constituents]. La Paz: Viceministerio de Asuntos de Género y Generacionales y Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit.Google Scholar
Vicepresidente del Estado Plurinacional. 2008. Enciclopedia Histórica Documental Del Proceso Constituyente Boliviano: Tomo III, Informes Por Comisiones [Historical documentary encyclopedia of the Bolivian constitutent process: Tome III, Commission reports]. Vol. 1. La Paz: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional.Google Scholar
Wade, Peter. 2010. Race and Ethnicity in Latin America. 2nd ed. New York: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Weismantel, Mary J. 2001. Cholas and Pishtacos: Stories of Race and Sex in the Andes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zabala, María Lourdes. 2010. “Del Feminismo a Los Feminismos en Bolivia” [From feminism to feminisms in Bolivia]. Working Paper, Coordinadora de la Mujer. http://www.coordinadoradelamujer.org.bo/observatorio/archivos/publicaciones/articulo_feminismos_en_bolivia_lourdes_zabala_58.pdf (accessed May 14, 2018).Google Scholar
Zulawski, Ann. 2007. Unequal Cures: Public Health and Political Change in Bolivia, 1900–1950. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar