Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:51:17.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equality, Democracy, and the Broadening and Deepening of Gender Quotas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2013

Susan Franceschet  and
Jennifer M. Piscopo
Susan Franceschet
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Jennifer M. Piscopo
Affiliation:
Occidental College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The diffusion of gender quotas reflects the legitimation of the normative principle of women's equality in public life. Legislative gender quotas, whether adopted through top-down elite decision making or through bottom-up feminist activism, are frequently justified via appeals to norms of inclusion and fairness. These democratic ideals of women's full representation and participation have indeed gained traction: Over the past two decades, quotas have extended beyond legislatures to public institutions, such as cabinets and executive agencies, and to state advisory councils, subnational governments, labor union directorates, and corporate boards. Such diffusion signals a profound gendering of public space and leadership, a transformation initiated by states assuming active roles as the guarantors—rather than mere promoters—of equality.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 310 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antíc Gaber, Milika. 2008. “Slovenia: From Voluntary to Legislatived Quotas.” In Electoral Gender Quota Systems and Their Implementation in Europe, ed. Dahlerup, Drude and Freidenvall, Lenita. Brussels: The European Parliament.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (2): 231–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Kevin, and Mínguez-Vera, Antonio. 2008. Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3): 435–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Catherine, Skibnes, Renate, and Pringle, Judith K.. 2011. “Gender Equality and Corporate Governance.” Gender, Work, and Organization 18 (6): 613–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M., eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sater, James. 2012. “Reserved Seats, Patriarchy, and Patronage in Morocco.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Storvik, Aagoth, and Teigen, Mari. 2010. Women on Board: The Norwegian Experience. Report published for the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Foundation.Google Scholar