Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T04:20:20.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disability as a New Frontier for Feminist Intersectionality Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

Nancy J. Hirschmann
Nancy J. Hirschmann
Affiliation:
The University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Disability is the new gender. I make this claim with trepidation and a sense of irony. Certainly, disability studies today is like women's studies was in the 1970s and 1980s, when feminist scholars had to convince colleagues in “mainstream” political science that gender was something worth attending to, that it was a serious enterprise, and that it should be part of the mainstream. The fields of history and English have been somewhat more welcoming of disability as a valid topic of study, just as these fields preceded political science in realizing that gender was an important category of study. But political science has been slow to catch on.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 396 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asch, Adrienne, and Fine, Michelle. 1988. “Introduction: Beyond Pedestals.” In Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics, ed. Fine, Michelle and Asch, Adrienne. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Barile, Maria. 2001. “Disablement and Feminization of Poverty.” Women in Action 2 (June): 49–57.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble, Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Lennard J. 1995. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Moral Psychology and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Greenspan, J., Joel, D., Rebecca, M.LeRescheCraft, Linda Craft, Linda, Arendt-Nielsen, Lars, Berkley, Karen J., Fillingim, Roger B., Gold, Michael S., Holdcroft, Anita, Lautenbacher, Stefan, Mayer, Emeran A., S. Mogil, Jeffrey, Murphy, Anne Z. and Traub, Richard J.. 2007. “Studying Sex and Gender Differences in Pain and Analgesia: A Consensus Report.” Pain 132 (1, Supplement): S26–S45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1992. Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J.. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Eunjung. 2011. “Asexuality in Disability Narratives.” Sexualities 14 (4): 479–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Ruth, ed. 2004. Voices from the Edge: Narratives about the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Ellen. 2002. “Critical Divides: Judith Butler's Body Theory and the Question of Disability.” NWSA Journal 14 (3): 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweik, Susan M. 2010. The Ugly Laws: Disability in Public. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. 2008. Disability Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, Erika. 2006. “Americans with Disabilities: 2002.” Current Population Reports, U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p70-107.pdf (Accessed July 18, 2012).Google Scholar
Thomson, Rosemarie Garland. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Rosemarie Garland. 2002. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” NWSA Journal 14 (Fall): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, Anita M. 1996. “Gender Variations in Clinical Pain Experience.” Pain 65 (2/3): 123–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, Nicholas. 1998. “Enabling Identity: Disability, Self and Citizenship.” In The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives, ed. Shakespeare, Tom. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whitson, Heather, Landerman, Lawrence, Newman, Anne, Fried, Linda, Pieper, Carl, and Cohen, Harvey. 2010. “Chronic Medical Conditions and the Sex-Based Disparity in Disability: The Cardiovascular Health Study.” Journals of Gerontology: Series A 65A (12): 1325–31.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 1980. “Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Female Body Comportment, Motility, and Spatiality.” Human Studies 3 (2): 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar