Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:09:47.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Difference and Social Structure: Iris Young's Legacy of a Critical Social Theory of Gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2008

S. Laurel Weldon
Affiliation:
Purdue University

Extract

Iris Young was a wide-ranging political and social theorist whose works transformed the study of democratic theory, theories of justice, multiculturalism, nationalism, and group rights, among others—all of this in addition to her enormous contribution to feminist theory. Young left not only specific substantive legacies but also her method as a critical social theorist: She sought to undertake projects that helped make sense of the claims and analyses made by progressive social movements, including feminist movements, by providing a philosophical grounding for those claims and analyses. She trained her critical eye on political and social institutions, aiming to expose relations of domination and other injustices.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1993. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex.” In Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations, vol. 1, ed. D. Kelly Weisberg.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1982. “Action, Structure, Power” In Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Does Not Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5(1): 6380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Angela. 1997. “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.” In Critical Race Feminism, ed. Adrien, Wing. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Aida. 1989. “Relating to Privilege: Seduction and Rejection in the Subordination of White Women and Women of Color,” Signs 14 (4): 833855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, Joy and Akins, Frances. 1998. “The Welfare State and Women: Structure, Agency and Diversity.” Social Politics 5 (3)(Fall): 259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Benita. 2004. Separate Roads to Feminism: Black, Chicana and White Feminist Movements in America's Second Wave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2006. “The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender?Politics & Gender 2 (June): 235–48.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (3): 335–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Fiona. 1995. “Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Class in Welfare States.” Social Politics 2 (2): 127–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 1997. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1994. “Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective.” Signs 19 (3): 713–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford Series in Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2005. “Lived Body versus Gender: Reflections on Social Structure and Subjectivity.” In On Female Body Experience: “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar