Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:50:38.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Critical Analysis of Gender Mainstreaming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2013

Marsha Lyle-Gonga
Marsha Lyle-Gonga*
Affiliation:
Austin Peay State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By definition, gender mainstreaming is the process by which a gendered perspective (male and female) is integrated into the fabric of our communities, institutions, and lives (United Nations 1997). We live in a society defined by our values of equality, social justice, and opportunity. In order for these values to permeate into our everyday lives, we must address issues of “separateness” that still seem to prevail in our institutions, particularly in our political science curricula. Di Stefano (1997, 204) presented gender as “a socially constructed and politically enforced notion of what it means to be male or female” and argues that this gendered lens is “political because it has the power to impose meaning and value to our activities and social relationships.” Mainstreaming is a transition from a male-defined curriculum to a more gender-balanced curriculum that better reflects the improved status of women in society.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 209 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berheide, Catherine W., and Segal, Marcia T.. 1985. “Teaching Sex and Gender: A Decade of Experience.” Teaching Sociology 12 (3): 267–83.Google Scholar
Center for American Women and Politics. 2012. “Statistics on Women's Political Participation.” https://www.rutgers.edu/cawp (accessed January 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Di Stefano, Christine. 1997. “Integrating Gender into Political Science Curriculum: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Opportunities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 30 (2): 204–6.Google Scholar
Elison, Sonja. 1997. “Integrating Women into the Study of European Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 30 (2): 202–4.Google Scholar
Githens, Marianne. 1994. “Teaching Against the Double Couplet of Problem/Victim.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (4): 721–22.Google Scholar
Gruberg, Martin. 1994. “Incorporating a Women's Studies Dimension into Mainstream Political Science Courses.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (4): 717–18.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, Susan. 2004. “The Political Uses of Obscurantism: Gender Mainstreaming and Intersectionality.” Development Bulletin 64: 87–91.Google Scholar
Kramer, Laura, and Martin, George T.. 1988. “Mainstreaming Gender: Some Thoughts for the Non-Specialist.” Teaching Sociology 16 (2): 133–40.Google Scholar
Lublin, David, and Brewer, Sarah. 2003. “The Continuing Dominance of Traditional Gender Roles in Southern Elections. Social Science Quarterly 84 (2): 379–96.Google Scholar
Patrick, John J. 1967. Political Socialization of American Youth: Implications for Secondary School Social Studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.Google Scholar
Parker, E. Joyce. 1994. “Mainstreaming Gender, Race, and Sexual Orientation in Teaching: A Student's Point of View.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (4): 722–23.Google Scholar
Pearson, Allen, and Rooke, Patricia. 1993. “Gender Studies and Teacher Education: A Proposal.” Canadian Journal of Education 18 (4): 414–28.Google Scholar
Silverberg, Helene. 1994. “Organizing a Course that is Attentive to Issues of Racial and Sexual Difference.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (4): 718–19.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1997. The Report of the Economic and Social Council for 1997.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay L., and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar