No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“A Contingent ‘Yes’” Revisited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2023
Extract
Reading these essays gave me a thrill of excitement like the one I felt on hearing that the #MeToo movement had extended even into China. The ideas in this Critical Perspectives collection go much deeper into the nature of and reasons for descriptive representation than I could two decades ago. Anne Phillips (1995) and Melissa Williams (1998), the two pioneers in this field who produced analyses far more thorough than mine, would, I think, agree with me on this. So would Iris Marion Young, whose early challenge in a talk over lunch inspired me to puzzle out my own take on the problem.
- Type
- Critical Perspectives Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association
References
Ackerly, Brooke, Cabrera, Luis, Forman, Fonna, Johnson, Genevieve Fuji, Tenove, Chris, and Wiener, Antje. 2021. “Unearthing Grounded Normative Theory: Practices and Commitments of Empirical Research in Political Theory.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Published online March 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1894020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Peter. 2021. “Experience, Knowledge, and Political Representation.” Politics & Gender. Published online December 2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 521–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2014. “Distorted Communication, Unequal Representation: Constituents Communicate Less to Representatives Not of Their Race.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2021. Making Constituencies: Representation as Mobilization in Mass Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Carli, Linda L.. 2007. Through the Labyrinth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Gay, Claudine. 2002. “Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 717–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard Logan. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1993. “Feminism and Democratic Community.” In Democratic Community: NOMOS XXXV, eds. Chapman, John W. and Shapiro, Ian. New York: New York University Press, 342–77.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1994. “Using Power/Fighting Power.” Constellations 1 (1): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation,” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2014. “A Contingency Theory of Accountability.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, eds. Bowens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E., and Schillemans, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 55–68.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2019. “Recursive Representation.” In Creating Political Presence, eds. Castiglione, Dario and Pollak, Johannes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 298–337.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, and Macedo, Stephen. 2019. “Populism and Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15: 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1861] 1975. “Considerations on Representative Government.” In Mill: Three Essays, ed. Wollheim, R.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., and David, M. J. Lazer. 2018. Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2020. Capital and Ideology. Trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2014. “Shape-Shifting Representation.” American Political Science Review 108 (4): 723–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shames, Shauna L. 2017. Out of the Running: Why Millennials Reject Political Careers and Why It Matters. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E., and Mansbridge, Jane, with Bächtiger, André, Cameron, Max A., Chambers, Simone, Ferejohn, John, Jacobs, Alan, Knight, Jack, Naurin, Daniel, Schwartzberg, Melissa, Tamir, Yael, Thompson, Dennis, and Williams, Melissa. 2015. “Deliberative Negotiation.” In Political Negotiation, eds. Mansbridge, Jane and Martin, Cathie Jo. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 141–98.Google Scholar
Weeks, Ana Catalano. 2022. Making Gender Salient: From Gender Quota Laws to Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1994. “Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective.” Signs 19 (3): 713–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar