Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:55:49.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenging National Regimes From Below: Toronto Child-Care Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

Rianne Mahon
Rianne Mahon
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Canada, as in the United States, the postwar welfare regime recognized the citizenship of the male breadwinner while women, for the most part, remained second-class citizens. This was reflected, inter alia, in Canada's child-care policy, a federal-provincial cost-sharing arrangement that provided subsidies to low-income families able to demonstrate their need, rather than as a public service available to all those who want and need it. While this meant that the Canadian state did not guarantee the right to affordable child care, these intergovernmental arrangements also offered feminists opportunities to challenge federal policy at the provincial and local level. This article examines child-care politics in Toronto, Canada's largest city and the first one in Canada to have a municipal child-care program. It shows how, in the 1970s, Toronto began to break with the liberal assumptions that characterized its past policies. Toronto's child-care program also posed a potential challenge to the national and provincial regimes. This, however, required the movement to secure changes at the provincial and/or federal level, which it thus far has failed to do.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 55 - 78
Copyright
© 2007 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkin, Wendy. 1998. “Babies of the World Unite: The Early Day-care Movement and Family Formation in the 1970s.” In Family Matters: Papers in Post-Confederation Canadian Family History, ed. Lori Chambers and Edgar-André Montigny. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.
Banaszak, Lee Ann, Karen Beckwith, and Dieter Rucht. 2003. “When Power Relocates: Interactive Changes in Women's Movements and States.” In Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State, ed. Lee Ann Banaszak, Karen Beckwith, and Dieter Rucht. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–29.
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 2002. Welfare Hot Buttons: Women, Work and Social Policy Reform. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 2005. “Training a Spotlight on Urban Citizenship: The Case of Women in London and Toronto.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (1): 9–25.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Christine, and Anita Nyberg. 2002. “Welfare State Restructuring and Childcare in Sweden.” In Childcare Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, ed. Sonya Michel and Rianne Mahon. New York: Routledge, 287–308.
Bradford, Neil. 2002. Why Cities Matter: Policy Research Perspectives for Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
Cohen, Bronwen, Peter Moss, Pat Petrie, and Jennifer Wallace. 2004. A New Deal for Children: Re-forming Education and Care in England, Scotland and Sweden. Bristol: Policy Press.
Collier, Cheryl. 2001. “Working with Parties: Success and Failure of Childcare Advocates in British Columbia and Ontario in the 1990s.” In Changing Childcare: Five Decades of Childcare Advocacy and Policy in Canada, ed. Susan Prentice. Halifax: Fernwood Books, 117–32.
Cox, Robert Henry. 2001. “The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany.” World Politics 53 (3): 463–98.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2001. “Welfare State Regimes and Industrial Relations Systems: The Questionable Role of Path Dependency Theory in Comparing Western Capitalisms.” In Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the United States, ed. B. Ebbinghaus and P. Manow. London: Routledge, 105–24.
Esping-Andersen, Gösta. 1999. The Social Foundations of Postindustrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Federal, Provincial, Territorial Working Group on Childcare. 1985. “Report to the Meeting of Ministers Responsible for the Status of Women.” Winnipeg, Manitoba, 6–7 June.
Finkel, Alvin. 1995. “Even the Little Children Cooperated: Family Strategies, Childcare Discourse and Social Welfare Debates, 1945–1975.” Labour/le travail 36 (Fall): 91–118.Google Scholar
Friendly, Martha. 1994. Childcare Policy in Canada: Putting the Pieces Together. Toronto: Addison-Wesley.
Hayden, Jacqueline. 1997. “Neo-Conservatism and Childcare Services in Alberta: a Case Study.” Occasional Paper No. 9, Childcare Resource and Research Unit, University of Toronto.
Jenson, Jane. 2002. “Against the Current: Childcare and Family Policy in Quebec.” In Childcare Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, ed. Sonya Michel and Rianne Mahon. New York: Routledge, 309–32.
Jenson, Jane. 2006. “Rolling Out or Back Tracking on Quebec's Childcare System? Ideology Matters.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, York University, June.
Jenson, Jane, and Rianne Mahon. 2002. Bringing Cities to the Table: Child Care and Intergovernmental Relations. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
Jenson, Jane, and Denis Saint Martin. 2003. “Building Blocks for a New Welfare Architecture: Is the New LEGO the Model for an Active Society?” Presented at the 2003 meetings of Research Committee 19, Toronto, 22–24 August.
Kipfer, Stefan, and Roger Keil. 2002. “Toronto Inc: Planning the Competitive City in the New Toronto.” Antipode 35 (3): 227–64.Google Scholar
Kyle, Irene. 1992. “An Historical Overview of Childcare in Ontario.” Vol. 1. Canadian Childcare in Context, ed. Alan Pence. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Magnusson, Warren. 1983. “Toronto.” In City Politics in Canada, ed. W. Magnusson and A. Sancton. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mahon, Rianne. 2000. “The Never-Ending Story: The Struggle for Universal Childcare in the 1970s.” Canadian Historical Review 81 (4): 583–615.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. 2005. “Rescaling Social Reproduction: Childcare in Toronto/Canada and Stockholm/Sweden.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (June): 341–57.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne, and Susan Phillips. 2002. “Dual Earner Families Caught in a Liberal Welfare Regime? The Politics of Canadian Childcare.” In Childcare Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, ed. Sonya Michel and Rianne Mahon. New York: Routledge, 191–218.
Mahon, Rianne, with the assistance of Jane Jenson, and Katherine Mortimer. 2006. Learning from Each Other: Early Learning and Childcare Experiences in Canadian Cities. Produced for the Cities of Toronto and Vancouver and Social Development Canada.
McAdam, Doug, John McCarthy, and Mayer Zald. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McGrath, Susan. 1999. The Politics of Truth: A Case Study of Knowledge Construction by the Social Policy Council of Metro, 1957–1988. Ph.D. diss., Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto.
McKeen, Wendy. 2004. Money in Their Own Name: The Feminist Voice in Poverty Debates in Canada, 1970–1995. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Metro Toronto Day Care Advisory Committee. 1977. “Recommendations Developed from Day Care Workshop Held at Queen's Park on November 14, 1977.” Presented to the Ministry of Community and Social Services and the Metropolitan Toronto Department of Social Services, 31 March.
Metropolitan Toronto. 1981. Future Directions for Day Care Services in Toronto: Final Report of the Metropolitan Toronto Day Care Planning Task Force. April.
Metropolitan Toronto. 1990. Comprehensive Review of the Childcare Report: Facing the Future. Community Services Department, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
Metropolitan Toronto Social Planning Council. 1968. Day Care in Toronto. Toronto: Social Planning Council.
O'Connor, Julia, Ann Shola Orloff, and Sheila Shaver. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 2001. “Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies.” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed. P. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 410–56.
Prentice, Susan. 1988. “Kids Are Not for Profit: The Politics of Childcare.” Social Movements/Social Change: The Politics and Practice of Organizing, ed. Frank Cunningham et al. Toronto: Between the Lines.
Prentice, Susan. 1992. Militant Mothers in Domestic Times: Toronto's Postwar Childcare Struggle. Ph.D. thesis, Sociology, York University.
Randall, Vicky. 2004. “The Making of Local Child Daycare Regimes: Past and Future.” Policy and Politics 32 (1): 3–20.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen, eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teghtsoonian, Katherine. 1993. “Neo-conservative Ideology and Opposition to Federal Regulation of Childcare Services in the United States and Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 77–121.Google Scholar
Toronto Commissioner of Planning, and Development. 1983. “Daycare Centres in Crisis.” Memo to the Neighbourhoods Committee, 28 June.
Visser, Jelle, and Anton Hemerijck. 2001. “Learning and Mimicking: How European Welfare States Reform.” Unpublished paper, University of Leiden/University of Amsterdam.
Welch, Robert. 1984. “Childcare in Ontario: Understanding the Present, Directions for the Future.” Presentation on child care to the third annual federal, provincial, territorial meeting of ministers responsible for the status of women, Toronto.
Wincott, Daniel. 2006. “Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy? Universalist Childcare Ambitions in Europe's ‘Most Liberal’ Welfare Regime.” Social Politics 13 (2): 286–312.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan, and David M. Trubek. 2003. “Introduction: Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments.” In Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments, ed. J. Zeitlin and D. M. Trubek. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1–32.