Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:21:06.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standing for Women? Which Women? The Substantive Representation of Women's Interests and the Research Imperative of Intersectionality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2011

Wendy Smooth
Wendy Smooth
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In conducting interviews with female African American state legislators, I found that the great debates among women and politics scholars over the meaning of women's issues have not captured a major issue that surfaced time and again in the interviews. The African American women I interviewed affirmed that “women's issues” constituted a top priority on their legislative agendas and understood themselves as representatives of women's interests. But when they began to discuss the issues they championed on behalf of women, these issues were not the “usual suspects.” They often mentioned proposed legislation that I would have coded as a “children's issue” or, at times, a “race issue.” These legislators articulated a political agenda reflecting crosscutting issues that were not easily codified along a single issue axis. Instead, the legislators articulated their legislative priorities as complex and multifaceted. They saw their legislative priorities affecting constituents across their districts, but they also keenly expressed the impact of these issues on the lives and well-being of women in particular.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 436 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beckwith, Karen, and Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2007. “Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women's Political Representation.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (3): 555–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caiazza, Amy. 2004. “Does Women's Representation in Electoral Office lead to Women-Friendly Policy? Analysis of State-Level Data.” Women & Politics 26 (1): 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Cathy. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Suzanne B. 2008. “Intersectionality in Theory and Practice.” In Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location, ed. Grabham, Emily, Cooper, Davina, Krishnadas, Jane, and Herman, Didi. Cavendish: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Towards a Theory of Race-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Jason A., and O'Brien, Erin E.. 2010. “Quasi-Experimental Design, Constituency, and Advancing Women's Interests: ‘Critically’ Reexamining the Influence of Gender on Substantive Representation. Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 472–486.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1998. Welfare's End. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2008. Breaking the Glass Ceiling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smooth, Wendy. 2006. “Intersectionality in Electoral Politics: A Mess Worth Making.” Politics & Gender 2 (September): 400–14.Google Scholar
Smooth, Wendy.. 2010. “Intersectionalities of Race and Gender and Leadership.” In Gender and Women's Leadership: A Reference Handbook, ed. O'Conner, Karen. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
Strolovich, Dara. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swers, Michelle. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Valentine, Gill. 2007. “Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge to Feminist Geography” The Professional Geographer 59: 1, 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2006. “The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender.” Politics & Gender 2 (June): 235–48.Google Scholar