Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-6wzj7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T16:29:58.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Singled Out or Drawn In? Social Polices and Lone Mothers’ Political Engagement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2019

Jennifer Shore Open the ORCID record for Jennifer Shore [Opens in a new window]
Jennifer Shore*
Affiliation:
University of Mannheim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although it is no longer a symbol of socially degenerate behavior in many societies, single motherhood remains associated with numerous risks and disadvantages. In addition to their disadvantages in the labor market and their greater risk of poverty, single mothers also tend to be less politically active. This article explores the patterns of single mothers’ electoral participation across 25 European countries. In addition to the individual-level characteristics that shape the likelihood of taking part in an election, public policies can also do a great deal to encourage political involvement. Drawing on data from the European Social Survey combined with national family and labor market policies, I examine the ways in which policies aiming to reconcile the responsibilities at work and home can draw single mothers into political engagement. I find that early childhood expenditures and cash benefits to families are positively related to single mothers’ political participation.

Keywords

Family policylone motherswelfare statepolitical participationmultilevel analysissurvey researchpolicy feedback
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 471 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abelson, Robert P., Loftus, Elizabeth F., and Greenwald, Anthony. 1992. “Attempts to Improve the Accuracy of Self-Reports of Voting.” In Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, ed. Tanur, Judith M., 138–53. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Abendschön, Simone, and Steinmetz, Stephanie. 2014. “The Gender Gap in Voting Revisited: Women's Party Preferences in a European Context.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 21 (2): 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Paul A. 1991. “Voters’ Intermediation Environments in the 1988 Presidential Contest.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (3): 371–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belli, Robert F., Traugott, Michael W., Young, Margaret, and McGonagle, Katherine A.. 1999. “Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source Monitoring.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63 (1): 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Linda, and Bennett, Stephen E.. 1989. “Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest: The Impact of Socialization and Political Dispositions.” American Politics Quarterly, 1989:105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, Andre. 2006. “What Affects Voter Turnout?” Annual Review of Political Science 9:111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, Jonathan, Keung, Antonia, and Chzhen, Yekaterina. 2018. “Cash benefits and povery in single-parent families.” In The Triple Bind of Single-Parent Families: Resources, Employment and Policies to Improve Well-Being, eds. Nieuwenhuis, Rense and Maldonado, Laurie C., 337–400. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David, and Burroway, Rebekah. 2012. “Targeting, Universalism, and Single-Mother Poverty: A Multilevel Analysis Across 18 Affluent Democracies.” Demography 49 (2): 719–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, Henry E., Verba, Sidney, and Scholzman, Kay L.. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braver, Sanford L., and Lamb, Michael E.. 2018. “Shared Parenting after Parental Separation: The Views of 12 Experts.” Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 59 (5): 372–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy. 2002. “Gender: Public Opinion and Political Action.” In Political Science: State of the Discipline, eds. Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., 462–87. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea. 2003. How Politics Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea L. 2012. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15 (1): 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Detraz, Nicole, and Peksen, Dursun. 2018. ” ‘Women Friendly’ Spending?: Welfare Spending and Women's Participation in the Economy and Politics.” Politics & Gender 14 (2): 137–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DICE Database. 2015. “Parental Leave Entitlements: Historical Perspective (around 1870–2014).” Munich. http://www.cesifo-group.de/DICE/fb/4BNKLH8pQ.Google Scholar
Dronkers, Jaap. 2015. “The Changing Impact of Education on Divorce and Break-Up Risk.” Institute for Family Studies. https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-changing-impact-of-education-on-divorce-and-break-up-risk.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women's New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
ESS Round 4: European Social Survey Round 4 Data. 2008. Data file edition 4.5. NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway Data Archive and distributor.Google Scholar
ESS Round 5: European Social Survey Round 5 Data. 2010. Data file edition 3.4. NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
ESS Round 6: European Social Survey Round 6 Data. 2012. Data file edition 2.4. NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
Esser, Ingrid, and Olsen, Karen M.. 2018. “Matched on job qualities? Single and coupled parents in European comparison.” In The Triple Bind of Single-Parent Families: Resources, Employment and Policies to Improve Well-Being, eds. Nieuwenhuis, Rense and Maldonado, Laurie C., 285–310. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio. 1996. “The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. 1999. “Electoral Engineering and Cross-National Turnout Differences: What Role for Compulsory Voting?” British Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 205–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härkönen, Juho. 2017. Diverging Destinies in International Perspective: Education, Single Motherhood, and Child Poverty. Luxembourg: Luxembourg Income Study (LIS). LIS Working Paper Series, 713. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/169273/1/713.pdf.Google Scholar
Hobbs, William R., Christakis, Nicholas A., and Fowler, James H.. 2014. “Widowhood Effects in Voter Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IDEA. 2019. “International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance: Compulsory Voting.” https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout/compulsory-voting.Google Scholar
Ihinger-Tallman, Marilyn. 2010. “Quality of Life and Well-Being of Single Parent Families.” Marriage & Family Review 20 (3–4): 513–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert W., and Miller, Ross A.. 1995. “Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies During the 1980s.” Comparative Political Studies 27 (4): 467–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A.. 2008. “Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Anna, Marien, Sofie, and Hooghe, Marc. 2015. “Economic Crisis and Levels of Political Participation in Europe (2002–2010): The Role of Resources and Grievances.” West European Politics 38 (3): 465–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Holger L. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Transitions out of Marriage in Great Britain.” Electoral Studies 29 (2): 249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knijn, Trudie, Martin, Claude, and Millar, Jane M.. 2007. “Activation as a Common Framework for Social Policies towards Lone Parents.” Social Policy & Administration 41 (6): 638–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korenman, Sanders, Kaestner, Robert, and Joyce, Theodore J.. 2001. “Unintended Pregnancy and the Consequences of Nonmartial Childbearing.” In Out of Wedlock: Causes and Consequences of Nonmarital Fertility, eds. Wu, Lawrence L. and Wolfe, B., 259–87. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 2000. “Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 7 (2): 127–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, Stefan. 2007. “Country-Level Comparisons of Welfare State Change Measures: Another Facet of the Dependent Variable Problem within the Comparative Analysis of the Welfare State?” Journal of European Social Policy 2007:5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumlin, Staffan. 2004. The Personal and the Political: How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology, Political Evolution, and Institutional Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jane. 1992. “Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy 2 (3): 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jane. 2006. “Employment and Care: The Policy Problem, Gender Equality and the Issue of Choice.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 8 (2): 109–14.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma—Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldonado, Laurie C., and Nieuwenhuis, Rense. 2015. “Family Policies and Single Parent Poverty in 18 OECD Countries, 1978–2008.” Community, Work & Family 18 (4): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Paul, and Nguyen, Christoph G.. 2018. “Political Participation in European Welfare States: Does Social Investment Matter?” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (6): 912–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2002. “Bringing the State Back in to Civic Engagement: Policy Feedback Effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II Veterans.” American Political Science Review 96 (2): 351–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne, and Soss, Joe. 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Jane, and Rowlingson, Karen, eds. 2001. Lone Parents, Employment and Social Policy: Cross-National Comparisons. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsa, Joya, Moller, Stephanie, and Budig, Michelle J.. 2007. “Work-Family Practices and Poverty for Partnered and Single Women in Europe and North America.” Gender and Society 21 (6): 804–27.Google Scholar
Mirsa, Joya, Moller, Stephanie, Strader, Eiko, and Wemlinger, Elizabeth. 2012. “Family Policies, Employment and Poverty Among Partnered and Single Mothers.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 30 (1): 113–28.Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, Rense, and Maldonado, Laurie C.. 2015. “Prepare versus Repair? Combining Parental Leave and Family Allowances for Social Investment Against Single-Parent Poverty.” Belgian Review of Social Securtiy 1: 115–23.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas. 2008. “The Calculus of Voting in Compulsory Voting Systems.” Political Behavior 30 (4): 455–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavolini, Emmanuele, and van Lancker, Wim. 2018. “The Matthew Effect in Childcare Use: A Matter of Policies or Preferences?” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (6): 878–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45 (4): 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001. “Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies.” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed. Pierson, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 410–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quaranta, Mario, and Giulia M. Dotti Sani. 2018. “Left Behind? Gender Gaps in Political Engagement Over the Life Course in Twenty-Seven European Countries.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 25 (2): 254–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubery, Jill, Smith, Mark, Fagan, Colette, and Grimshaw, Damian. 1997. Women's Employment in Europe: Trends and Prospects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruhm, Christopher J. 1998. “The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113:285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Shore, Jennifer. 2019. The Welfare State and the Democratic Citizen: How Social Policies Shape Political Equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, Jennifer, and Tosun, Jale. 2019. “Personally affected, politically disaffected? How experiences with public employment services impact young people's political efficacy.” Social Policy and Administration Online First: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spol.12496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Shane. 2011. “How Compelling is Compulsory Voting? A Multilevel Analysis of Turnout.” Political Behavior 33 (1): 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skevik, Anne. 2005. “Women's Citizenship in the Time of Activation: The Case of Lone Mothers in ‘Needs-Based’ Welfare States.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12 (1): 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, Frederick. 2008. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, Joe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 363–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadelmann-Steffen, . 2011. “Dimensions of Family Policy and Female Labor Market Participation: Analyzing Group-Specific Policy Effects.” Governance 24 (2): 331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Laura, and Jennings, M. K.. 1995. “Life-Cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 421–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H.. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wichowsky, Amber, and Moynihan, Donald P.. 2008. “Measuring How Administration Shapes Citizenship: A Policy Feedback Perspective on Performance Management.” Public Administration Review 68 (5): 908–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Nicholas H., and Wolfinger, Raymond E.. 2008. “Family Structure and Voter Turnout.” Social Forces 86 (4): 1513–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Lawrence L., Bumpass, Larry L., and Musick, Kelly. 2001. “Historical and Life Course Trajectories of Nonmarital Childbearing.” In Out of Wedlock: Causes and Consequences of Nonmarital Fertility, eds. Wu, Lawrence L. and Wolfe, B.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 3–48.Google Scholar