Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:54:50.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breastfeeding in Public: Disgust and Discomfort in the Bodiless Public Sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2016

Amanda Barnes Cook
Amanda Barnes Cook*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While breastfeeding mothers generally possess an official legal right of access to public places, the lived experience of breastfeeding mothers in public is marked by inequality and lack of autonomy. The motivating question of this article is, from the perspective of a breastfeeding mother, what characterizes an ideal—that is, equal and autonomous—public sphere in a liberal society? I explore in particular the issue of people, including breastfeeding mothers, who evoke discomfort or disgust. I argue that public and private spheres must be accessible in certain ways: first, every person must be able to occupy public space while embracing all significant aspects of their personhood; second, the comfort of others cannot weigh more than an individual's own needs in public; finally, all people must be able to opt for privacy in a way that does not entail invisibility or coerced exclusion. In making this argument, I describe three main ways in which breastfeeding mothers respond to the antipathy of the public sphere: exclusion, accommodation, and affirmation. I end with an exploration of the ideal of public and private spheres defined by equality and autonomy and offer concrete steps that can improve the position of breastfeeding mothers in public.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 677 - 699
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, Alison. 2000. “Thinking Through Breasts: Writing Maternity.” Feminist Theory 1 (2): 173–88.Google Scholar
Bickford, Susan. 2000. “Constructing Inequality: City Spaces and the Architecture of Citizenship.” Political Theory 28 (3): 355–76.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2005. “Tolerance and Equality: The Jewish Question and the Woman Question.” In Going Public: Feminism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Private Sphere, eds. Scott, Joan W. and Keates, Debra. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 15–42.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26: 55–80.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2005. “A Semiotics of the Public/Private Distinction.” In Going Public: Feminism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Private Sphere, eds. Scott, Joan W. and Keates, Debra. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 261–77.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kass, Leon R. 1997. “The Wisdom of Repugnance.” New Republic 216 (22): 17–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Kohn, Margaret. 2004. Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, Joan B., ed. 1998. Feminism, The Public and the Private. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Rebecca. 2014. “Healthy Discretion? Breastfeeding and the Mutual Maintenance of Motherhood and Public Space.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 21 (2): 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1859] 1998. On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, William Ian. 1997. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mulready-Ward, Candace, and Hackett, Martine. 2014. “Perception and Attitudes: Breastfeeding in Public in New York City.” Journal of Human Lactation 30 (2): 195–200.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). 2015. “Breastfeeding State Laws.” http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/breastfeeding-state-laws.aspx (accessed May 13, 2015).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2004. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1986. Of Mother Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist. 1974. “Woman, Culture, and Society: A Theoretical Overview.” In Woman, Culture, and Society, eds. Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist and Lamphere, Louise. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 17–42.Google Scholar
Stearns, Cindy A. 1999. “Breastfeeding and the Good Maternal Body.” Gender & Society 13 (3): 308–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TheBump.com and Breastfeeding.com. 2011. 2nd Annual Breastfeeding Survey. Typescript.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Yoshino, Kenji. 2007. Covering: the Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1998. ” Impartiality and the Civic Public.” In Feminism, the Public and the Private, ed. Landes, Joan B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 421–47.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cook supplementary material

Online Abstract

Download Cook supplementary material(File)
File 14.2 KB