Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:25:46.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partisan media effects beyond one-shot experimental designs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2021

Kathleen Searles Open the ORCID record for Kathleen Searles [Opens in a new window] ,
Joshua P. Darr Open the ORCID record for Joshua P. Darr [Opens in a new window] ,
Mingxiao Sui ,
Nathan Kalmoe ,
Raymond Pingree  and
Brian Watson
Kathleen Searles*
Affiliation:
Political Science, Mass Communication, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Joshua P. Darr
Affiliation:
Manship School of Mass Communication, Political Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Mingxiao Sui
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Studies, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Nathan Kalmoe
Affiliation:
Manship School of Mass Communication, Political Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Raymond Pingree
Affiliation:
Manship School of Mass Communication, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Brian Watson
Affiliation:
Crosswind Media, Austin, Texas, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous study demonstrates that partisans perceive in-party news outlets as fair, and out-party news outlets as unfair. However, much of this study relies on one-shot designs. We create an ecologically valid design that randomly assigns participants to news feeds within a week-long online news portal where the balance of in-party and out-party news outlets has been manipulated. We find that sustained exposure to a feed that features out-party news media attenuates Democrats' beliefs that Fox News is unfair, but the same is not true for Republican's perceptions of MSNBC's fairness. Unexpectedly, repeated exposure to in-party news did increase Republicans' beliefs that Fox News is unfair. This study updates our understanding of partisan news effects in a fragmented online news environment.

Keywords

Experimental designFox Newsmedia effectspartisan news
Type
Research Note
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 206 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arceneaux, K and Johnson, M (2013) Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, K and Johnson, M (2015) How does media choice affect hostile media perceptions? Evidence from participant preference experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2, 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, K, Johnson, M, Lindstädt, R and Vander Wielen, RJ (2016) The influence of news media on political elites: investigating strategic responsiveness in congress. American Journal of Political Science 60(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, K, Dunaway, J, Johnson, M and Vander Wielen, RJ (2020) Strategic candidate entry and congressional elections in the era of Fox news. American Journal of Political Science 64(2), 398–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beam, MA and Kosicki, GM (2014) Personalized news portals: filtering systems and increased news exposure. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, K, Tewksbury, D, Bond, BJ, Drogos, KL, Porter, RW, Yahn, A and Zhang, Y (2008) Hostile news: partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication 58, 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J, Klar, S, Krupnikov, Y, Levendusky, M and Ryan, JB (2019). The Illusion of Affective Polarization. Northwestern Policy Research Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Garrett, RK and Stroud, NJ (2014) Partisan paths to exposure diversity: differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication 64, 680–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, R and Chaiken, S (1994) The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, WH (2007). Econometric Analysis, 6th Edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Higher Education.Google Scholar
Gunther, AC, McLaughlin, B, Gotlieb, MR and Wise, D (2017) Who says what to whom: content versus source in the hostile media effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 29, 363–383.Google Scholar
Hogg, MA and Reid, SA (2006) Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory 16, 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S and Hahn, KS (2009) Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication 59, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y (2011) The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: the relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to crosscutting perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 971–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T, Hoshino, T and Suzuki, T (2017) Inadvertent learning on a portal site: a longitudinal field experiment. Communication Research 47, 729–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, M and Malhotra, N (2016) Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Political Communication 33, 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, S (2010) All the news fit to post? Comparing news content on the web to newspapers, television, and radio. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 87, 548–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, GJ and Yurukoglu, A (2017) Bias in cable news: persuasion and polarization. American Economic Review 107, 2565–2599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, SA (2012) A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication 62, 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G and Searles, K (2013) Fair and balanced news or a difference of opinion? Why opinion shows matter for media effects. Political Research Quarterly 66, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G and Searles, K (2014) Who let the (attack) dogs out? New evidence for partisan media effects. Public Opinion Quarterly 78, 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, NJ (2011). Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, NJ, Muddiman, A and Lee, JK (2014) Seeing media as group members: an evaluation of partisan bias perceptions. Journal of Communication 64, 874–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundar, SS, Knobloch-Westerwick, S and Hastall, MR (2007) News cues: information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 366–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology 33, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallone, RP, Ross, L and Lepper, MR (1985) The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, JG and Ksiazek, TB (2012) The dynamics of audience fragmentation: public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication 62, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J and Reid, SA (2013) A self-categorization explanation for opinion consensus perceptions. Human Communication Research 39, 269–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Searles et al. supplementary material

Searles et al. supplementary material

Download Searles et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 358.5 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Searles et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SABH51
Link