Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:05:45.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mobilizing Voters with Aggressive Metaphors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2017

Nathan P. Kalmoe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do personality traits condition the effects of campaign messages meant to mobilize voters? With two nationally representative US survey experiments, I show that common aggressive metaphors mobilize or demobilize voters depending on their traits. Aggressive metaphors increase the mobilizing impact of motivations to participate among aggressive individuals but decrease that impact among low-aggression people. For example, the language mobilizes strong partisans with aggressive personalities but demobilizes strong partisans low in aggression. This heterogeneity showcases the nuanced power of metaphors in campaigns, reaffirms the importance of personality in political behavior, and reveals the hidden role of aggression in non-violent political behavior for the first time. In practice, the net effects of aggressive metaphors can be positive, negative, or null depending on average traits in an audience.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 2019 , pp. 411 - 429
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Nathan Kalmoe is an Assistant Professor of Political Communication at Louisiana State University, Journalism Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 ([email protected]). This project was supported by the Gerald R. Ford Fellowship and the Marsh Research Fellowship at the University of Michigan. Data for Study 2 were collected by Time-Sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, NSF Grant 0818839, Jeremy Freese and Penny Visser, Principal Investigators. The author thanks Don Kinder, Ted Brader, Nancy Burns, Nick Valentino, Brad Bushman, Jenna Bednar, Cindy Kam, Charles Doriean, Josh Gubler, anonymous reviewers, and the participants of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Politics and Policy at the University of Michigan for their comments and suggestions. An earlier version of this work was presented at the 2011 APSA Annual Meeting. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.36

References

Achen, Christopher, and Blais, Andre. 2010. ‘Intention to Vote, Reported Vote, and Validated Vote’. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Anderson, Craig A., and Bushman, Brad J.. 2002. ‘Human Aggression’. Annual Review of Psychology 53:27–51.Google Scholar
Anderson, Craig A., and Ford, Catherine M.. 1986. ‘Affect of the game player: Short-term effects of highly and mildly aggressive video games’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12:390–402.Google Scholar
Anderson, Craig A., Carnagey, Nicholas L., and Eubanks, Janie. 2003. ‘Exposure to Aggressive Media: The Effects of Songs With Aggressive Lyrics on Aggressive Thoughts and Feelings’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84:960–971.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, B. Ann, and Miller, Norman. 1996. ‘Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis’. Psychological Bulletin 119:422–447.Google Scholar
Bougher, Lori D. 2012. ‘The Case for Metaphor in Political Reasoning and Cognition’. Political Psychology 33:145–163.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted, and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2007. ‘Identities, Interests, and Emotions: Symbolic versus Material Wellsprings of Fear, Anger, and Enthusiasm’. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus, Ann N. Crigler and Michael MacKuen (eds), The Affect Effect: The Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, 180–201. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R., and Golder, Matt. 2006. ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis’. Political Analysis 14:63–82.Google Scholar
Bryant, Fred B., and Smith, Bruce D.. 2001. ‘Refining the Architecture of Aggression: A Measurement odel for the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire’. Journal of Research in Personality 35:138–167.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay L., and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bushman, Brad J. 1995. ‘Moderating Role of Trait Aggressiveness in the Effects of Aggressive Media on Aggression’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:950–960.Google Scholar
Bushman, Brad J. 1996. ‘Individual Differences in the Extent and Development of Aggressive Cognitive-Associative Networks’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22:811–819.Google Scholar
Bushman, Brad J. 1998. ‘Priming Effects of Media Violence on the Accessibility of Aggressive Constructs in Memory’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24:537–545.Google Scholar
Bushman, Brad J., and Wells, Gary L.. 1998. ‘Trait aggression and hockey penalties: Predicting hot tempers on the ice’. Journal of Applied Psychology 83:969–974.Google Scholar
Buss, Arnold H., and Perry, Mark. 1992. ‘The Aggression Questionnaire’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63:452–459.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cappella, Joseph N., and Jamieson, Kathleen H.. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Renzi, P., Alcini, P., D’Imperio, G., and Travaglia, G.. 1983. ‘Instigation to aggress and escalation of aggression examined from a personological perspective: The role of irritability and of emotional susceptibility’. Aggressive Behavior 9:345–351.Google Scholar
Chang, Linchiat, and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2009. ‘National Surveys Via RDD Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality’. Public Opinion Quarterly 73:641–678.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. ‘Framing Theory’. Annual Review of Political Science 10:103–126.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2010. ‘Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects Over Time’. American Political Science Review 104:663–680.Google Scholar
Craig, Stephen C., Niemi, Richard G., and Silver, Glenn E.. 1990. ‘Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items’. Political Behavior 12(3):289–314.Google Scholar
Felsten, Gary, and Hill, Virgil. 1999. ‘Aggression Questionnaire hostility scale predicts anger in response to mistreatment’. Behavior Research and Therapy 37:87–97.Google Scholar
Freedman, Paul, and Goldstein, Ken. 1999. ‘Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads’. American Journal of Political Science 43:1189–1208.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Larimer, Christopher W.. 2008. ‘Social Pressure & Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment’. American Political Science Review 102:33–48.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P., and Shaw, Daron R.. 2011. ‘How Large and Long-Lasting are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment’. American Political Science Review 105(1):135–150.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Greg A., Doherty, David, Dowling, Conor M., and Panagopoulos, C.. 2013. ‘Big Five Personality Traits and Responses to Persuasive Appeals: Results from Voter Turnout Experiments’. Political Behavior 35:687–728.Google Scholar
Harris, Julie A. 1997. ‘A Further Evaluation of the Aggression Questionnaire: Issues of Validity and Reliability’. Behavioral Research and Therapy 35:1047–1053.Google Scholar
Hartman, Todd K. 2012. ‘Toll Booths on the Information Superhighway? Policy Metaphors in the Case of Net Neutrality’. Political Communication 29:278–298.Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. Sunshine. 2005. ‘Campaign Effects and the Dynamics of Turnout Intention in Election 2000’. Journal of Politics 66:50–68.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, and Cassese, Erin. 2007. ‘On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger’. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler and M. MacKuen (eds), The Affect Effect, p. 202–230. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Joel T., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 1981. ‘The Effect of Metaphor on Political Attitudes’. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2:305–316.Google Scholar
Kalmoe, Nathan P. 2014. ‘Fueling the Fire: Aggressive Metaphors, Trait Aggression, and Support for Political Violence’. Political Communication 31(4):545–563.Google Scholar
Kalmoe, Nathan P. 2015. ‘Trait Aggression in Two Representative U.S. Surveys: Testing the Generalizability of College Samples’. Aggressive Behavior 41(2):171–188.Google Scholar
Kalmoe, Nathan P., Gubler, Joshua R., and Wood, David A.. 2017 ‘Toward Conflict or Compromise? How Violent Metaphors Polarize Partisan Issue Attitudes’. Political Communication. Online First View.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D., and Simas, Elizabeth N.. 2010. ‘Risk Orientations and Policy Frames’. Journal of Politics 72:381–396.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 2007. ‘Curmudgeonly Advice’. Journal of Communication 57:155–162.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna. 2011. ‘When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout’. American Journal of Political Science 55:796–812.Google Scholar
Landau, Mark J., Meier, Brian P., and Keefer, Lucas A.. 2010. ‘A metaphor-enriched social cognition’. Psychological Bulletin 136:1045–1067.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Schlesinger, Mark. 2005. ‘Policy Frames, Metaphorical Reasoning, and Support for Public Policies’. Political Psychology 26:77–114.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, Heldman, Caroline, and Babbitt, Paul. 1999. ‘The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment’. American Political Science Review 93:851–875.Google Scholar
Lavine, Howard, Borgida, Eugene, and Sullivan, John L.. 2000. ‘On the Relationship Between Attitude Involvement and Attitude Accessibility: Toward a Cognitive-Motivational Model of Political Information Processing’. Political Psychology 21:81–106.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Margaret A., and Brown, Jonathon D.. 2006. ‘Trait aggressiveness and situational provocation: A test of the Traits as Situational Sensitivities (TASS) model’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32:1100–1113.Google Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2000. ‘News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens are Guided by a Trusted Source’. American Journal of Political Science 44(2):301–315.Google Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2016. ‘It’s Not All About Resources: Explaining (or Not) the Instability of Individual-Level Political Participation Over Time’. American Politics Research 44:943–981.Google Scholar
Moise-Titus, Jessica M. 1999. The role of negative emotions in the media violence-aggression relation. Dissertation.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J., Hibbing, Matthew V., Canache, Damarys, Seligson, Mitchell A., and Anderson, Mary R.. 2010. ‘Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior’. American Political Science Review 104:85–110.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana, and Reeves, Byron. 2005. ‘The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust’. American Political Science Review 99(1):1–15.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. ‘Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and its Effect on Tolerance’. American Political Science Review 91:567–583.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Craig, Stephen C., and Mattei, Franco. 1991. ‘Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study’. American Political Science Review 85:1407–1413.Google Scholar
Ottati, Victor, Rhoads, Susan, and Graesser, Arthur C.. 1999. ‘The Effect of Metaphor in Processing Style in a Persuasion Task: A Motivational Resonance Model’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:688–697.Google Scholar
Pitney, John J. 2000. The Art of Political Warfare. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Stephen J., and Hansen, John M.. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. Hindsale, IL: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Mark, and Lau, Richard R.. 2000. ‘The Meaning and Measure of Policy Metaphors’. American Political Science Review 94:611–626.Google Scholar
Sharpe, J. P., and Desai, S.. 2001. ‘The revised Neo Personality Inventory and the MMPI-2 Psychopathology Five in the prediction of aggression’. Personality and Individual Differences 31:505–518.Google Scholar
Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Paul F., and Ewart, Laura A.. 2005. ‘The Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and its relation to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies’. Personality and Individual Differences 38:337–346.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Beckmann, Matthew N., and Burr, Thomas A.. 2001. ‘A Spiral of Cynicism for Some: The Contingent Effects of Campaign News Frames on Participation and Confidence in Government’. Political Communication 18:347–367.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Brader, Ted, Groenendyk, Eric W., Gregorowicz, Krysha, and Hutchings, Vincent L.. 2011. ‘Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation’. Journal of Politics 73:156–170.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay L., and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weinschenk, Aaron C., and Panagopoulos, Costas. 2014. ‘Personality, Negativity, and Political Participation’. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 2:164–182.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 2004. On Human Nature, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, David G. 1987. ‘Leader Appeal, Leader Performance, and the Motive Profiles of Leaders and Followers: A Study of American Presidents and Elections’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52:196–202.Google Scholar
Zaller, John 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Kalmoe Dataset

Dataset

http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QSGXZC
Link
Supplementary material: File

Kalmoe supplementary material

Kalmoe supplementary material 1

Download Kalmoe supplementary material(File)
File 47.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Kalmoe supplementary material

Kalmoe supplementary material 2

Download Kalmoe supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 352.3 KB