Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:47:21.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Media with reputational concerns: yes men or watchdogs?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2019

Greg Chih-Hsin Sheen Open the ORCID record for Greg Chih-Hsin Sheen [Opens in a new window]
Greg Chih-Hsin Sheen*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science, LondonWC2A 2AE, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the political process, the electorate needs to determine the competence of the government by both observing its policy decisions and acquiring information from the media. However, media reports are often criticized for not being independent and truthful. This paper discusses whether the public can determine the quality of a government from media reports. In other words, are media outlets more likely to act as watchdogs or just as “yes men” to the government? This paper argues that, because of reputational concerns, the media usually avoid criticizing the government. The media only report truthfully when the expected competence of the government is sufficiently low and the probability for the voter to learn from other information sources is sufficiently high. Otherwise, media outlets—especially low-quality outlets—will pander to the government in their reporting. Policy bias or media capture is not required for the yes-man problem to prevail.

Keywords

Comparative political economyformal modeling
Type
Original Article
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 345 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althaus, SL, Edy, JA, Entman, RM and Phalen, P (1996) Revising the indexing hypothesis: officials, media, and the Libya crisis. Political Communication 13, 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, R and Guimarães, C (1994) Media monopoly in Brazil. Journal of Communication 44, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, SP and McLaren, J (2012) Media mergers and media bias with rational consumers. Journal of the European Economic Association 10, 831–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, S and Shotts, KW (2010) Does informative media commentary reduce Politicians' incentives to pander? Journal of Public Economics 94, 838–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, D (2006) Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics 90, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battaglini, M (2002) Multiple referrals and multidimensional cheap talk. Econometrica 70, 1379–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, WL (1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 40, 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T (2005) Political selection. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T (2007) Principled Agents?: The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T and Prat, A (2006) Handcuffs for the grabbing hand?: media capture and Government accountability. American Economic Review 96, 720–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydstun, AE (2013) Making the News: Politics, the Media, and Agenda Setting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, C and Himmler, O (2016) Mass media, instrumental information, and electoral accountability. Journal of Public Economics 134, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillaud, B and Tirole, J (2002) Parties as political intermediaries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 1453–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, C-F and Knight, B (2011) Media bias and influence: evidence from newspaper endorsements. The Review of Economic Studies 78, 795–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, VP and Sobel, J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50, 1431–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eraslan, H and Özertürk, S (2017) Information gatekeeping and media bias. Rice University Working Paper. Available at http://he6.web.rice.edu/Papers/media2017-12-05.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlbach, S and Sonin, K (2014) Government control of the media. Journal of Public Economics 118, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, M and Shapiro, JM (2006) Media bias and reputation. Journal of Political Economy 114, 280–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, M and Shapiro, JM (2010) What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica 78, 35–71.Google Scholar
Hallin, DC (1986) The “Uncensored War”: The Media and Vietnam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kartik, N and Van Weelden, R (2019) Informative cheap talk in elections. The Review of Economic Studies 86, 755–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, V and Morgan, J (2001) A model on expertise. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 747–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larcinese, V, Puglisi, R and Snyder, JM Jr. (2011) Partisan bias in economic news: evidence on the agenda-setting behavior of U.S. newspapers. Journal of Public Economics 95, 1178–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M, Benoit, K and Garry, J (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review 97, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S (2001) Political correctness. Journal of Political Economy 109, 231–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P (2014) Watchdog journalism. In Bovens, M, Goodin, RE and Schillemans, T (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 525–544.Google Scholar
Ottaviani, M and Sørensen, PN (2006) Reputational cheap talk. RAND Journal of Economics 37, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, C (1993) A theory of “yes men”. American Economic Review 83, 757–770.Google Scholar
Shapiro, JM (2016) Special interests and the media: theory and an application to climate change. Journal of Public Economics 144, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, CR (2017) #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolton, S (2019) Are biased media bad for democracy? American Journal of Political Science 63, 548–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J and Chiu, D (1996) Government's little helper: U.S. Press coverage of foreign policy crises, 1945–1991. Political Communication 13, 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Sheen Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9SJ50N
Link
Supplementary material: File

Sheen supplementary material

Sheen supplementary material

Download Sheen supplementary material(File)
File 13.3 KB