Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:23:37.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is political knowledge unique?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2018

Craig M. Burnett Open the ORCID record for Craig M. Burnett [Opens in a new window]  and
Mathew D. McCubbins
Craig M. Burnett*
Affiliation:
Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA
Mathew D. McCubbins
Affiliation:
Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Survey research shows that voters know very little about politics. Left unexamined is whether political knowledge is a distinct type of knowledge when compared to other subjects. We seek to establish a baseline by putting political knowledge into a broader context. We show that our respondents’ knowledge about politics is similar in construction to their knowledge about other subjects, such as shopping, sports, popular culture, geography, economics, and the rules of the road. We conclude that knowledge of politics largely resides on the same dimension as other knowledge topics, implying that knowledge of politics is not a unique construct.

Type
Research Notes
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 188 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, CH (1975) Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response. American Political Science Review 69, 1218–1231.Google Scholar
Anderson, JR (1993) Problem Solving and Learning. American Psychologist 48, 35–44.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S, Rodden, J Snyder, JM Jr (2008) The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 102, 215–232.Google Scholar
Bennett, SE (1988) Know-Nothings” Revisited: The Meaning of Political Ignorance Today. Social Science Quarterly 69, 476–490.Google Scholar
Campbell, A, Converse, PE, Miller, WE Stokes, DE (1960) The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cattell, RB (1966) The Scree Test for the Number of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1, 245–276.Google Scholar
Converse, PE (1964) The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In DE Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, 206–261. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Converse, PE (1970) Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue. In ER Tufte (ed.), The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, 168-189. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Converse, PE (1990) Popular Representation and the Distribution of Information. In Ferejohn JA and Kuklinski JH (eds), Information and Democratic Processes, 369-388. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
DeBell, M (2013) Harder Than it Looks: Coding Political Knowledge on the ANES. Political Analysis 21, 393–406.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, MX (2009) The Psychology of Civic Learning. In Borgida E, Federico CM and Sullivan JL (eds), The Political Psychology of Democratic Citizenship , 23-51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Entman, R (1989) Democracy Without Citizens: Media and the Decay of American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, JL Caldeira, GA (2009) Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court. Journal of Politics 71, 429–441.Google Scholar
Jerit, J, Barabas, J Bolsen, T (2006) Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information Environment. American Journal of Political Science 50, 266–282.Google Scholar
Johnson, PE (2009) What Knowledge is of Most Worth?. In Borgida E, Federico CM and Sullivan JL (eds), The Political Psychology of Democratic Citizenship , 52-70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, HF (1960) The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 141–151.Google Scholar
Lippmann, W ([1922] 1997) Public Opinion. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, A (2006) How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence. Critical Review 18, 217–232.Google Scholar
Lupia, A (2016) Uninformed: Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, A McCubbins, MD (1998) The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luskin, RC (1987) Measuring Political Sophistication. American Journal of Political Science 31, 856–899.Google Scholar
Luskin, RC (1990) Explaining Political Sophistication. Political Behavior 12, 331–361.Google Scholar
Luskin, RC Bullock, JG (2011) “Don’t Know” Means “Don’t Know”: DK Responses and the Public’s Level of Political Knowledge. Journal of Politics 73, 547–557.Google Scholar
Mondak, JJ Davis, BC (2001) Asked and Answered: Knowledge Levels When We Will Not Take “Don’t Know” for an Answer. Political Behavior 23, 199–224.Google Scholar
Pietryka, MT MacIntosh, RC (2013) An Analysis of ANES Items and Their Use in the Construction of Political Knowledge Scales. Political Analysis 21, 407–429.Google Scholar
Poole, KT (2005) Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, M Lupia, A (2008) Money, Time, and Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Quick Recall and Political Learning Skills. American Journal of Political Science 52, 169–183.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J (1950) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Somin, I (1998) Voter Ignorance and the Democratic Ideal. Critical Review 12, 413–458.Google Scholar
Spirling, A (2012) U.S. Treaty Making with American Indians: Institutional Change and Relative Power, 1784-1911. American Journal of Political Science 56, 84–97.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Burnett and McCubbins Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GXUY81
Link
Supplementary material: File

Burnett and McCubbins supplementary material

Burnett and McCubbins supplementary material 1

Download Burnett and McCubbins supplementary material(File)
File 83.2 KB