Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:27:00.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How responsive is Trade Adjustment Assistance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2020

Sung Eun Kim Open the ORCID record for Sung Eun Kim [Opens in a new window]  and
Krzysztof Pelc
Sung Eun Kim*
Affiliation:
Political Science and International Relations, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
Krzysztof Pelc
Affiliation:
Political Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How responsive is the US’ Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) to the labor dislocation that results from trade integration? Recent findings suggest that the world's most ambitious trade adjustment program barely responds to import shocks, and that the shortfall is made up by disability insurance and early retirement. This holds considerable implications: TAA offers a lens onto the central question of whether developed democracies can effectively redistribute the gains from international economic integration. We take a closer look at these results. Using petition-level data over a 20-year period, we find that TAA is between 1.7 and 3.3 times more responsive than current estimates suggest. Yet the news is not all good. As we show, the responsiveness of TAA has decreased considerably since the 1990s, just as developed democracies started facing increasing pushback against liberalization. This shortfall, in turn, has political consequences: areas where TAA has been least responsive were also more likely to shift toward voting for Trump in the 2016 Presidential election. Our findings speak to the considerable challenge governments face in aiding workers “left behind” by liberalization.

Keywords

International Political EconomyTrade Adjustment AssistanceTrade CompensationElection
Type
Research Note
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 889 - 898
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Autor, DH, Dorn, D and Hanson, GH (2013) The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. The American Economic Review 103, 2121–2168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, D, Dorn, D, Hanson, G and Majlesi, K (2017) Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Manuscript. https://www.nber.org/papers/w22637.Google Scholar
Bailey, MA and Rom, MC (2004) A wider race? Interstate competition across health and welfare programs. The Journal of Politics 66, 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard-Rosa, C, Mashail, M, Rickard, S and Scheve, K (2017) The economic origins of authoritarian values: evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom. Working paper. URL: https://inequality.hks.harvard.edu/files/inequality/files/scheve17.pdfGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, B (2001) Globalization and welfare compensation: disentangling the ties that bind. International Organization 55, 509–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantone, I and Stanig, P (2018) The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science 62, 936–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engler, J, Pritzker, P, Alden, E and Taylor-Kale, L (2018) The work ahead: machines, skills, and us leadership in the twenty-first century. Council on Foreign Relations Independent Task Force Report No. 76. https://cdn.cfr.org/sites/default/files/The_Work_Ahead_CFR_Task_Force_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Hays, JC (2009) Globalization and the new politics of embedded liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, J, Lim, J and Spoon, J-J (2019) The path from trade to right-wing populism in Europe. Electoral Studies 60, 102038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, B (2018) Can displaced labor be retrained? Evidence from quasi-random assignment to trade adjustment assistance. Working Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3155386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMF, World Bank and WTO (2017) Making trade an engine of growth for all: the case for trade and for policies to facilitate adjustment. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2017/04/08/making-trade-an-engine-of-growth-for-allGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R and Norris, P (2016) Trump, brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Harvard JFK School of Government Faculty Working Papers Series pp. 1–52. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/trump-brexit-and-rise-populism-economic-have-nots-and-cultural-backlash.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malgouyres, C (2017) Trade shocks and far-right voting: evidence from french presidential elections. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper 2017/21 21. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2942173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, Y (2019) Political responses to economic shocks. Annual Review of Political Science 22, 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhlhausen, DB and Sherk, J (2014) Trade adjustment assistance: let the ineffective and wasteful ‘Job-Training’ program expire. The Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 4311. http://report.heritage.org/ib4311.Google Scholar
Muro, M and Parilla, J (2017) Maladjusted: It's time to reimagine economic ‘adjustment’ programs. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2017/01/10/maladjusted-its-time-to-reimagine-economic-adjustment-programs/.Google Scholar
Park, J (2012) Does occupational training by the trade adjustment assistance program really help reemployment? Success measured as occupation matching. Review of International Economics 20, 999–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thewissen, S and van Vliet, O (2017) Competing with the dragon: employment effects of chinese trade competition in 17 sectors across 18 OECD countries. Political Science Research and Methods 7, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Kim and Pelc Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/C2QO6J
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Kim and Pelc supplementary material

Kim and Pelc supplementary material

Download Kim and Pelc supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.9 MB