Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:14:47.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engendering Bilateralism: An Exploration of Possible Sources of Non-Centrism in Government Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2017

Paul V. Warwick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper seeks to identify factors that may lie behind the tendency for parliamentary governments to form primarily from one side of the left-right spectrum and to adopt non-centrist policy positions. Because of measurement limitations as well as the inherent complexity of the processes involved, this exploration is undertaken through simulation experiments. The new software created for these experiments allows the potential impact of a wide variety of factors, including voter and party motivations and distributions, policy space dimensionality, and constraints on government formation, to be assessed. Although the results cannot tell us what fosters non-centrism in the real world, they do reveal some factors that appear to be conducive to that end and thus serve as a guide to further research on this neglected topic.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 699 - 715
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Paul V. Warwick, Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Science, School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, Vancouver, BC, V5A 1S6 ([email protected]). To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.17

References

Armingeon, Klaus, Laura, Knopfel, David, Weisstanner, and Sarah, Engler. 2014. Comparative Political Data Set I 1960-2012. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.Google Scholar
Best, Robin E., Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael D.. 2012. ‘Representation as a Median Mandate: Taking Cross-National Differences Seriously’. European Journal of Political Research 51(1):1–23.Google Scholar
Browne, Eric, and Franklin, Mark. 1973. ‘Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies’. American Political Science Review 67:453–469.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, McDonald, Michael, Pennings, Paul, and Keman, Hans. 2012. Organizing Democratic Choice: Party Representation Over Time. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Michael. 2009. ‘Valence and Electoral Outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998’. Electoral Studies 28:111–122.Google Scholar
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES). 2003–2013. www.cses.org. CSES MODULES 1–3. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Les Partis Politiques, 2nd rev. ed. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona N., and Siegel, David A.. 2012. ‘Modeling the Institutional Foundation of Parliamentary Government Formation’. The Journal of Politics 74(2):427–445.Google Scholar
Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona N., and Siegel, David A.. 2014. ‘Response to Martin and Vanberg: Evaluating a Stochastic Model of Government Formation’. The Journal of Politics 76(4):880–886.Google Scholar
Kedar, Orit. 2009. Voting for Policy, Not Parties: How Voters Compensate for Power Sharing. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Sargenti, Ernest. 2012. Party Competition: An Agent-Based Model. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lanny, and Vanberg, Georg. 2014. ‘A Step in the Wrong Direction: An Appraisal of the Zero-Intelligence Model of Government Formation’. The Journal of Politics 76(4):873–879.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael, and Budge, Ian. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Scott E. 1999. ‘Computational Modeling from A to Z’. Complexity 5(1):35–41.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, and Macdonald, Stuart E.. 1989. ‘A Directional Theory of Issue Voting’. American Political Science Review 83:93–121.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald. 1963. ‘Spatial Models of Party Competition’. American Political Science Review 57:368–377.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang, and Bergman, Torbjörn, eds. 2003. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul V. 2010. ‘Bilateralism or the Median Mandate? An Examination of Rival Perspectives on Democratic Governance’. European Journal of Political Research 42(2):1–24.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul V. 2011a. ‘Government Intentions and Citizen Preferences in Dynamic Perspective’. British Journal of Political Science 41(3):599–619.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul V. 2011b. ‘Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy’. Comparative Political Studies 44:1675–1699.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul V. 2012. ‘Representation as a Median Mandate? A Response to Best, Budge and McDonald’. European Journal of Political Research 51(1):57–63.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul V. 2016. ‘The Ideological Congruence Illusion: The Impact of Valence’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 41(2):445–469.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul V., and Druckman, James N.. 2006. ‘The Portfolio Allocation Paradox: An Investigation Into the Nature of a Very Strong But Puzzling Relationship’. European Journal of Political Research 45:635–665.Google Scholar
Zakharova, Maria, and Warwick, Paul V.. 2014. ‘The Sources of Valence Judgments: The Role of Policy Distance and the Structure of the Left-Right Spectrum’. Comparative Political Studies 47:2000–2025.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Warwick supplementary material

Warwick supplementary material

Download Warwick supplementary material(File)
File 50.7 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Warwick Dataset

Dataset

http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XL5659
Link