Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T02:19:53.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retrospection, fairness, and economic shocks: how do voters judge policy responses to natural disasters?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2020

Michael M. Bechtel Open the ORCID record for Michael M. Bechtel [Opens in a new window]  and
Massimo Mannino
Michael M. Bechtel*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO63130-4899, USA Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research, University of St. Gallen, Bodanstrasse 8, CH-9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Massimo Mannino
Affiliation:
Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research, University of St. Gallen, Bodanstrasse 8, CH-9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Which factors explain voters’ evaluations of policy responses to economic shocks? We explore this question in the context of mass preferences over the distribution of disaster relief and evaluate three fairness-based explanations related to affectedness, need, and political ties. We analyze experimental data from an original survey conducted among American citizens and find that affectedness and need are key drivers of voters’ preferred disaster responses. We then compare these patterns with observed disaster relief distributions (1993–2008). The results suggest that observed relief allocations largely mirror the structure of voter preferences with respect to affectedness and need, but not to political ties. These findings have implications for an ongoing debate over the electoral effects of natural disasters, voters’ retrospective evaluations of incumbent performance, and the extent to which divide-the-dollar politics decisions align with mass preferences.

Keywords

comparative politicspolitical behaviorpolitical economypublic opinionvoting behavior
Type
Original Article
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 260 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, FG and Hill, LB (1966) Natural disasters as a political variable: the effect of a hurricane on an urban election. American Political Science Review 60(4), 974–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, CH and Bartels, LM (2017) Democracy for Realists Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, CH and Bartels, LM (2018) Statistics as if politics mattered: a reply to Fowler and Hall. Journal of Politics 80(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, DP (2012) The politics of natural disasters. Oxford Bibliographies in Political Science (June).Google Scholar
Aldrich, DP (2016) It's who you know: factors driving recovery from Japan's 11 March 2011 disaster. Public Administration 94(2), 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, DP and Sawada, Y (2015) The physical and social determinants of mortality in the 3.11 tsunami. Social Science and Medicine 124, 66–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashworth, S, de Mesquita, EB (2014) Is voter competence good for voters? Information, rationality, and democratic performance. American Political Science Review 108(3), 565–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, LR and Maestas, CD (2012) Catastrophic Politics: How Extraordinary Events Redefine Perceptions of Government. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baccini, L and Leemann, L (2020) Do natural disasters help the environment? How voters respond and what that means. Political Science Research and Methods, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.25.Google Scholar
Bechtel, MM and Hainmueller, J (2011) How lasting is vvoter gratitude? An analysis of the short- and long-term electoral returns to beneficial policy. American Journal of Political Science 55(4), 851–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, MM and Scheve, KF (2013) Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(32), 13763–13768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J (2012) Voter partisanship and the effect of distributive spending on political participation. American Journal of Political Science 57(1), 200–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, S (2017) Individual differences in group loyalty predict partisan strength. Political Behavior 39(3), 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, GW (2010) Swing voters, core voters and distributive politics. In Shapiro, I, Stokes, SC, Wood, EJ and Kirshner, AS (eds), Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 342–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, GW and McCubbins, MD (1986) Electoral politics as a redistributive game. Journal of Politics 48(2), 370–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRED, EM-DAT and UNISDR (2017) The human cost of weather-related disasters 1995–2016. Technical report CRED, EM-DAT, and UNISDR.Google Scholar
Cronin, TE and Genovese, MA (2004) Paradoxes of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, RJ. (2016) Party identification and its implications. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Thompson WR (ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damico, AJ, Conway, MM and Damico, SB (2000) Patterns of political trust and mistrust: three moments in the lives of democratic citizens. Polity 32(3), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M (1975) Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as a basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues 31, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Durante, R, Putterman, L, van der Weele, J (2014) Preferences for redistribution and perceptions of fairness: an experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association 12(4), 1059–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, R, Jakiela, P, Kariv, S and Markovits, D (2015) The distributional preferences of an elite. Science 349(6254), aab0096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gasper, JT and Reeves, A (2011) Make it rain? Retrospection and the attentive electorate in the context of natural disasters. American Journal of Political Science 55(2), 340–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J, Hopkins, D and Yamamoto, T (2014) Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multi-dimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis 22, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, A and Malhotra, N (2009) Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. American Political Science Review 103(3), 357–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, A and Malhotra, N (2013) Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science 16, 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heersink, B, Peterson, BD and Jenkins, JA (2017) Disasters and elections: estimating the net effect of damage and relief in historical perspective. Political Analysis 25(2), 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, JD and Ting, MM (2013) Redistribution, pork, and elections. Journal of the European Economic Association 11(6), 1382–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, L (1997) Aristotle on fair exchange. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XV, 147–175.Google Scholar
Kahn, ME (2005) The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income, geography, and institutions. Review of Economics and Statistics 87(2), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, MS (1939) The ability-to-pay theory of taxation. American Economic Review 29(1), 92–101.Google Scholar
Kriner, DL and Reeves, A (2015) Presidential particularism and divide-the-dollar politics. American Political Science Review 109(1), 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, EA and Tyler, TR (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, Y (2019) Political responses to economic shocks. Annual Review of Political Science (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, E and Pluemper, T (2007) The gendered nature of natural disasters: the impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97(3), 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obradovicha, N, Tingley, D and Rahwana, I (2018) Effects of environmental stressors on daily governance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(35), 8710–8715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J (2009) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reeves, A (2011) Political disaster: unilateral powers, electoral incentives, and presidential disaster declarations. Journal of Politics 73(4), 1142–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Respondi, (2015) Our Answers to the 28 Esomar Questions for Determining the Quality of Online Samples and Online Panels. Technical report Respondi.Google Scholar
Scheve, KF and Stasavage, D (2016) Taxing the Rich: A History of Fiscal Fairness in the United States and Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sood, R, Stockdale, G and Rogers, EM (1987) How the news media operate in natural disasters. Journal of Communication 37(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utz, S, Schultz, F and Glocka, S (2013) Crisis communication online: how medium, crisis type and emotions affected public reactions in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Public Relations Review 39(1), 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, L (2013) Justice, charity, and disaster relief: what, if anything, is owed to Haiti, Japan, and New Zealand?. American Journal of Political Science 57(2), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, WL Jr and Streib, G (2006) Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review 66(s1), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Bechtel and Mannino Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/JRLYVN
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Bechtel and Mannino supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Bechtel and Mannino supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 262.3 KB