Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:30:09.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling New Party Performance: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach for Volatile Party Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Thomas J. Mustillo
Thomas J. Mustillo*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 503A Cavanaugh Hall, 425 University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5140
*
e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study of new political parties in the Third Wave democracies of Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, and Venezuela conceptualizes the early life of a party as a developmental phase. The analysis uses latent trajectory modeling to identify five qualitatively distinctive performance profiles, which the author calls “explosive,” “contender,” “flash,” “flat,” and “flop” trajectories. This finding challenges the conventional approaches used in the study of new party performance, where scholars classify parties using subjective criteria, often into the successful/failed dichotomy. In unstable party systems, where we expect greater diversity in the performance profiles of new parties, latent trajectory modeling is preferred because it yields a result more consistent with extant theorizing on new parties. In stable systems, as in the case of Chile, the approaches can yield similar results. Nevertheless, the case of Venezuela (1958–88) demonstrates that even in stable party systems, the modeling approach used here can identify important variation that alternatives might miss.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , Summer 2009 , pp. 311 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Authors' note: I thank Jonathan Hartlyn, Marco Steenbergen, Raúl Madrid, Simón Pachano, Carlos de la Torre, Sarah Mustillo, and three anonymous reviewers at Political Analysis for comments.

References

Alcántara Sáez, Manuel, and Freidenberg, Flavia. 2001. Los duenos del poder: Los partidos polιticos en Ecuador (1978–2000). Quito: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Bauer, Daniel J., and Curran, Patrick J. 2003. Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods 8: 338–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1997. Taking on Goliath: The emergence of a new left party and the struggle for democracy in Mexico. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E., and Dupeux, Georges. 1962. Politicization of the electorate in France and the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong parties and lame ducks: Presidential party archy and factionalism in Venezucla. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1998. The dynamic diversity of Latin American party systems. Party Politics 4: 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell, Flanagan, Scott, and Beck, Paul A. 1985. Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies: Realignment or dealignment? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehr, Paula, and Patrick, Donald L. 2003. Trajectories of health for older adults over time: Accounting fully for death. Annals of Internal Medicine 139: 416–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dix, Robert H. 1989. Cleavage structures in party systems in Latin America. Comparative Politics 22: 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Unger, Amy V., Land, Kenneth C., McCall, Patricia L., and Nagin, Daniel S. 1998. How many latent classes of delinquent/criminal careers? Results from mixed Poisson regression analyses. American Journal of Sociology 103: 1593–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1957. Political parties, their organization and activity in the modern state. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 1988. Venezuela's Movimiento al Socialismo: From guerilla defeat to innovative politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gamarra, Eduardo A., and Malloy, James M. 1995. The patrimonial dynamics of party politics in Bolivia. In Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, S. and Scully, T. R., 399–433. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. 1996. Class and conservative parties: Argentina in comparative perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Harmel, Robert, and Robertson, John D. 1985. Formation and success of new parties: A cross-national analysis. International Political Science Review 6: 501–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A. 2003. Sowing ideas: Explaining the origins of Christian democratic parties in Latin America. In Christian democracy in Latin America: Electoral competition and regime conflicts, ed. Mainwaring, S. and Scully, T. R., 78–117. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2001. Altering party systems: Strategic behavior and the emergence of new political parties in western democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 2006. The Workers’ Party in power: The burdens of government. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, August 31-September 3, in Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2005. The role of parties and party systems in the policymaking process. Paper presented at the Inter-American Development Bank Workshop on State Reform, Public Policies, and Policymaking Processes, February 28-March 2, in Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret. 1992. The Workers’ Party and democratization in Brazil. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. The logics of party formation: Ecological politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic politics. Comparative Political Studies 33: 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2003. Patterns of party competition and electoral accountability in Latin America: An overview. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, August 28–31, in Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2001. Inside the black box: Recent studies of Latin American party organizations. Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven R. 2003. Transforming labor-based parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: An introduction. In Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives, ed. Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S., 1–64. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan P. 2007. Frente Amplio and the crafting of a social-democratic alternative in Uruguay. Latin American Politics and Society 49: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan P. Dual representation in Chile: The case of the UDI.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan P., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. 2005. Political representation in Latin America: A study of elite-mass congruence in nine countries. Comparative Political Studies 38: 388–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: The case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Torcal, Mariano. 2006. Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. In Handbook of party politics, ed. Katz, R. S. and Crotty, W., 204–27. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R. 1995. Introduction: Party systems in Latin America. In Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, S. and Scully, T. R., 1–36. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1990. Understanding party system change in Western Europe. Savage, MD: Frank Cass Publishers.Google Scholar
Michels, Roberto. 1911/1959. Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 1999. Political cleavages: Issues, parties, and the consolidation of democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S. 1999. Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods 4: 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S. 2005. Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political parties: Organization and power. Silver, M., trans. New York. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piattoni, Simona, ed. 2001. Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation: The European experience in comparative and historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 2002. Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review 96: 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raftery, Adrian E. 1995. Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion). In Sociological Methodology, ed. Marsden, P. V., 111–63. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rice, Roberta, and Van Cott, Donna L. 2006. The emergence and performance of indigenous peoples’ parties in South America: A subnational statistical analysis. Comparative Political Studies 39: 709–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. Forthcoming. Changing course: Parties, populism, and political representation in Latin America's neoliberal era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo. 2005. The ideological organization of Latin American legislative parties: An empirical analysis of elite policy preferences. Comparative Political Studies 38: 824–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 2004. From socialism to social democracy: Party organization and the transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies 37: 999–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1984. On the theory of party organization. Journal of Politics 46: 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, Timothy R. 1992. Rethinking the center: Party politics in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Chile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scully, Timothy R., and Valenzuela, Samuel. 1993. From democracy to democracy: Continuities and changes of electoral choices and the party system in Chile. Working paper no. 199. Notre Dame, IN: The Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Sjöblom, Gunnar. 1968. Party strategies in a multiparty system. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee 2005. From movements to parties in Latin America: The evolution of ethnic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar