Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T11:52:14.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement Models for Time Series Analysis: Estimating Dynamic Linear Errors-in-Variables Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Gregory E. McAvoy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article uses state space modeling and Kalman filtering to estimate a dynamic linear errors-in-variables model with random measurement error in both the dependent and independent variables. I begin with a general description of the dynamic errors-in-variables model, translate it into state space form, and show how it can be estimated via the Kalman filter. I report the results of a simulation in which the amount of random measurement error is varied, to demonstrate the importance of estimating measurement error models and the superiority that Kalman filtering has over regression. I use the model in a substantive example to examine the effects of public opinion regarding nuclear power on the enforcement decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. I then estimate a dynamic linear errors-in-variables model using multiple indicators for the latent variables and compare simulations of this model to the single indicator model. Finally, I provide substantive examples which examine the effect of people's economic expectations on their approval of the president and their approval of government more generally.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 7 , 1998 , pp. 165 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Political Methodology 

References

Aigner, Dennis, Hsiao, C., Kapteyn, A., and Wansbeek, T. 1984. “Latent Variables in Econometric Time-Series.” In Handbook of Econometrics, Griliches, Z. and Intriligator, M. (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Aoki, Masanao. 1990. State Space Modeling of Time Series. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1990. “Estimating Dynamic Models Using Kalman Filtering.” Political Analysis 1: 121–56.Google Scholar
Geweke, John. 1977. “The Dynamic Factor Analysis of Econometric Time-Series.” In Latent Variables in Socio-Economic Modelse, Aigner, Dennis J. and Goldberger, Arthur S. (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Damanyanti. 1989. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Dynamic Shock-Error Model.” Journal of Econometrics 41: 121–43.Google Scholar
Harvey, Andrew C. 1989. Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models, and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kellstedt, Paul, McAvoy, Gregory E., Stimson, James A. 1996 “Dynamic Analysis with Latent Constructs.” Political Analysis 5: 113–50.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert. 1994. “Studying Substantive Democracy.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27.1:9–17.Google Scholar
Lomba, Jaime Terceiro. 1990. Estimation of Dynamic Econometric Models with Errors in Variables. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Maravall, Agustin. 1979. Identification in Dynamic Shock-Error Models. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Maravall, Agustin, and Aigner, Dennis J. 1977. “Identification of the Dynamic Shock-Error Model: The Case of Dynamic Regression.” In Latent Variables in Socio-Economic Models, Aigner, Dennis J. and Goldberger, Arthur S. (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erickson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review 86: 597–611.Google Scholar
Magleby, David B., and Patterson, Kelly D. 1994. “Congressional Reform (The Polls-Poll Trends).” Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 419–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut, and Yantek, Thom. 1983. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Fluctuations of Presidential Popularity: The Question of Lagged Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 27: 785–807.Google Scholar
Nowak, Eugene. 1993. “The Identification of Multivariate Linear Dynamic Errors-in-Variables Models.” Journal of Econometrics 59: 213–27.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin. 1994. “Democratic Responsiveness: Untangling the Link between Public Opinion and Policy.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27: 25–29.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr., and Smith, Renée M. 1994. “Error Correction, Attitude Persistence, and Executive Rewards and Punishments: A Behavioral Theory of Presidential Approval.” Political Analysis 4: 127–83.Google Scholar
Rosa, Eugene, and Dunlap, Riley E. 1994. “Three Decades of Public Opinion (The Polls-Poll Trends).” Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 295–325.Google Scholar
Scherrer, W., Deistler, M., Kopel, M., and Reitgruber, W. 1991. “Solution Sets for Linear Dynamic Errors-in-Variables Models.” Statistica Neerlandica 45: 391–404.Google Scholar
Solo, V. 1986. “Identifiability of Time Series with Errors in Variables.” In Essays in Time Series and Applied Processes, Gani, J. and Preistley, M. B. (eds.), Sheffield: Applied Probability Trust, Journal of Applied Probability, special volume 23a.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Mark W., and Engle, Robert F. 1983. “Alternative Algorithms for the Estimation of Dynamic Factor, MIMIC and Varying Coefficient Regression Models.” Journal of Econometrics 23: 385–400.Google Scholar
Williams, John T., and McGinnis, Michael D. 1992. “The Dimension of Superpower Rivalry: A Dynamic Factor Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 68–118.Google Scholar
Yantek, Thom. 1988. “Polity and Economy under Extreme Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar