Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:25:39.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New techniques and current and future needs in polar research*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

George A. Llano
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
SCAR Bulletin No. 33, September 1969
Information
Polar Record , Volume 14 , Issue 93 , September 1969 , pp. 915 - 924
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected bibliography

Antarctic Journal Of The United States. 1966. United States Antarctic activities, long-range projection, 1965–1970. Antarctic Journal of the United States, Vol 1, No 3, p 79–99.Google Scholar
Crary, A. P.. 1965. Antarctic biology BioScience, Vol 15, No 4, p 251–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crary, A. P. 1968. Long range planning. Antarctic Journal of the United States, Vol 3, No 1, p 10–14.Google Scholar
Eklund, C. R. 1956. Antarctic fauna and some of its problems. Geophysical Monograph No 1. Antarctica in the International Geophysical Year. Washington DC, American Geophysical Union, p 117–23.Google Scholar
Jones, T. O. 1964. New US research station in the Antarctic Peninsula. Nature, Vol 204, No 4961, p 825–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llano, G. A. 1956. Botanical research essential to a knowledge of Antarctica. Geophysical Monograph No 1. Antarctica in the International Year. Washington DC, American Geophysical Union, p 124–33.Google Scholar
National Academy Of Sciences. 1961. Science in Antarctica. Part 1. The life sciences in Antarctica. Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences — National Research Council.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 1967. Grants and awards, Fiscal Year 1967. Seventeenth annual report, Vol 2, Washington, DC, Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Peters, J. A. and Collette, B. C. 1968. The role of time-share computing in museum research. Curator, Vol 11, No 1, p 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCAR. 1959. Scientific investigations recommended by SCAR. SCAR Bulletin, No 3, p 601–603.Google Scholar
Squires, D. F. 1968. Collections and the computer. BioScience, Vol 18, No 10, p 973–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasburg, D. W., Jones, E. C. and Iverson, R. T. B. 1968. Use of small submarines for biological and oceanographic research. Journal du Conseil, Vol 31, No 3, p 410–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Bureau On Budget-Planning And Conduct Of The United States Program For Antarctica. 1960. Circular A–51 United States Bureau of budgetplanning and conduct of the United Stales program for Antarctica. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. T. 1960. National Science Foundation; a ten-year réumé. Science, Vol 131, No 3410, p 1341–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar