Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:19:25.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monitoring shipborne visitors in Antarctica: a preliminary field study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Bernard Stonehouse
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER

Abstract

During every austral summer since the International Geophysical Year 1957–58 several thousand scientists and support staff have worked in Antarctica. A more recent development is the annual advent of 4000–5000 tourists, who now probably outnumber expedition members in the area covered by the Antarctic Treaty System. Most tourists come by ship, visiting coastal areas of the Antarctic Peninsula and the South Orkney and South Shetland islands that arc readily accessible beween November and March: smaller numbers visit the Ross Dependency and Adelie Land sectors. This article reviews Antarctic Treaty and International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) attitudes to tourism, and outlines a preliminary study of shipborne tourism between late December 1991 and March 1992 on Half Moon Island, South Shetland Islands. Within one month (January) a survey team from the Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, recorded 14 visits by six tour ships, bringing more than 2000 tourists. In addition, attitudes and expectations of visitors were studied on five ships. Arising from this study, a programme of visitor monitoring is planned as a joint project between British, Chilean, and Argentine scientific institutions during the next five years. Objectives are to find ways of minimizing both short-term and long-term impacts of tourists and other visitors on breeding birds and other ecological communities, and to provide a factual basis for regulation under the Antarctic Treaty System.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Treaty, Antarctic. 1991. Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Eleventh Special Consultative Meeting, 06 21.Google Scholar
Auburn, F.M. 1983. The Royal Commission on the Mount Erebus Air Disaster. Polar Record 21(133): 359–67.Google Scholar
Dey, A. 1991. India in Antarctica. Polar Record 27(161): 8792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enzenbacher, D.J. 1992. Tourists in Antarctica: numbers and trends. Polar Record 28(164): 1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C.M. 1991a. Environmental effects of human activities on King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Record 27(62): 193204.Google Scholar
Harris, C.M. 1991b. Environmental management on King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Record 21 (63): 313–24.Google Scholar
Heap, J. (editor). 1990. Handbook of the Antarctic Treaty System. Seventh edition. Cambridge, Polar Publications.Google Scholar
IAATO. 1991. Antarctica tour operators form association. Press release dated 28 08. International Association of Antarctic Tour Operators.Google Scholar
IUCN. 1991. A strategy for Antarctic conservation. Gland, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Naveen, R., de Roy, T., Jones, M. and Monteath, C. 1989. Antarctic Century 4 (0710).Google Scholar
Reich, R.J. 1980. The development of Antarctic tourism. Polar Record 20(126): 304–14.Google Scholar
Reich, R.J. 1982. Sea–borne tourism in the Antarctic: an evaluation. Polar Record 21(130): 39.Google Scholar
Stonehouse, B. 1965. Too many tourists in Antarctica? Animals 7(17): 450–53.Google Scholar
Stonehouse, B. 1990. A traveller's code for Antarctic visitors. Polar Record 26(56): 5658.Google Scholar