Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:31:49.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is there anything natural about the polar?

Part of: 60th anniversary of the Antarctic Treaty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2019

Justiina Dahl ,
Peder Roberts Open the ORCID record for Peder Roberts [Opens in a new window]  and
Lize-Marié van der Watt
Justiina Dahl
Affiliation:
Swedish Polar Research Secretariat, c/o Luleå Technical University, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden
Peder Roberts*
Affiliation:
Department of Cultural Studies and Languages, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment, KTH Royal Institute for Technology, Teknikringen 74D, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Lize-Marié van der Watt
Affiliation:
Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment, KTH Royal Institute for Technology, Teknikringen 74D, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Author for correspondence: Peder Roberts, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Are similarities of temperature, snow and ice cover, and (certain) marine mammals sufficient to warrant both polar regions being considered a single object of study or governance? We argue that their treatment as a unit is an invitation to examine the motivations behind the choice to be polar rather than Arctic or Antarctic. For individuals such as James Clerk Ross or Roald Amundsen, logistical requirements and analogous goals facilitated careers spanning both the Arctic and the Antarctic. This trend continued through the 20th century as individual scientists studying phenomena such as glaciers, sea ice, or aurora defined their research as “polar” in nature. Organisations such as the Scott Polar Research Institute and Norwegian Polar Institute could draw on traditions of national exploration in both polar regions, while the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute in St. Petersburg gained its southern mandate with the importance of the International Geophysical Year. By comparison, neither the Arctic Institute in Copenhagen nor the Argentine Antarctic Institute felt any need to become polar. The creation of polar identity is ultimately a matter of geopolitics, of the value states see in instruments and symbols that speak to polar rather than Arctic or Antarctic interests. In cases such as Finland’s icebreaker industry, a technological capability justified Antarctic interest even without any national research tradition. We conclude by asking whether there is anything more natural about the polar regions than there is about the concept of a “tripolar” world in which the high alpine regions form a natural unit along with the Arctic and Antarctic.

Keywords

ArcticAntarcticPolarHistoryGeopolitics
Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 55 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 326 - 329
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonello, A. (2019). The greening of Antarctica: assembling an international environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arctic Institute of North America (1967). Minutes of Executive Committee meeting, 14 October 1967. Ottawa: Libraries and Archives Canada MG28 I79, box 194.Google Scholar
Arctic Institute of North America (1958). Minutes of Board of Governors meeting, 5 December 1958. Ottawa: Libraries and Archives Canada MG28 I79, box 193.Google Scholar
Auburn, F. M. (1972). The Ross Dependency. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawood, J. (1979). The Magnetic Crusade: science and politics in early Victorian Britain. Isis, 70(4), 492–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, K. (2010). Governing Antarctica: contemporary challenges and the enduring legacy of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. Global Policy 1(1), 108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elzinga, A. (2004). Otto Nordenskjöld’s quest to internationalize south-polar research. In Elzinga, A., Nordin, T., Turner, D., & Wråkberg, U. (Eds.), Antarctic challenges: historical and current perspectives on Otto Nordenskjöld’s Antarctic expedition (pp. 262–290). Gothenburg: Royal Society of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1989). Antarktiset alueet, Suomen Etelämantereeseen kohdistuva tutkimustoiminta. Helsinki: Archives of the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Signum 13.4. Antarctic regions, Finland’s Antarctic research.Google Scholar
Finnish Ministry of Trade and Industry (1986–1987) Kauppa- ja teollisuusministeriön työryhmä- ja toimikuntaraportteja (KTMA) (1986–1987). Helsinki: National Archives, UCC 25, MTI working groups documents (1986–1987).Google Scholar
Finnish Ministry of Trade and Industry (1987) Aims of the Antarctic activities of Finland. Helsinki, 25 September 1987.Google Scholar
Friedman, R. M. (2004a). Nansenismen. In Drivenes, E.-A. & Jølle, H. D. (Eds.) Norsk polarhistorie 2: vitenskapene (pp. 107–174). Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Friedman, R. M. (2004b). Å spise kirsebær med de store. In Drivenes, E.-A. & Jølle, H. D. (Eds.) Norsk polarhistorie 2: vitenskapene (pp. 331–420). Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Howkins, A. (2008). Defending polar empire: opposition to India’s proposal to raise the ‘Antarctic Question’ at the United Nations in 1956. Polar Record 44(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howkins, A. (2015). The polar regions: an environmental history. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Huettmann, F. (Ed.) (2012). Protection of the three poles. Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leane, E. & Miles, G. (2017). The poles as planetary places. The Polar Journal 7(2), 270–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misicka, S. (2018). ‘How the Alps inform polar pesearch’, 24 June 2018. Retrieved from https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/polar2018_how-the-alps-inform-polar-research/44208586.Google Scholar
Polar Knowledge Canada (2019). Polar Knowledge Canada. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/polar-knowledge.html.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. (2011). The European Antarctic: science and strategy in Scandinavia and the British Empire. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, K. S. (1999). Antarctica. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Savours, A. (1962). Sir James Clark Ross, 1800–1862. Geographical Journal, 128(3), 325–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Nordic Council (1988). Nordiska rådets verksamhet 1971–1986, Översikt över rådets rekommendationer och yttranden. Oslo: Graphic Systems.Google Scholar