Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:45:05.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geological investigations in the Falkland Islands Dependencies before 1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Raymond J. Adie
Affiliation:
Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, Department of Geology, University of Birmingham.

Extract

From the time of its discovery until the latter years of the nineteenth century Antarctica remained a terra incognita to the geologist, but in the early years of this century the Falkland Islands Dependencies attracted some academic interest, particularly from geologists. Undoubtedly this was mainly due to the fact that the Dependencies occupy one of the more accessible parts of the Antarctic continent and also bear a close geological relationship to South America.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Will, H.. Das Exkursionsgebiet der Deutschen Polarstation auf Süd-Georgien in geognostischer, floristischer und faunistischer Beziehung. Deutsche geographische Blätter, Vol. 7, 1884, p. 116–44.Google Scholar
2Thurach, H.. Geognostische Beschreibung der Insel Süd-Georgien. International Polarforschung 1882–83: die Deutsche Expedition, Vol. 2, No. 7, 1890, p. 109–66.Google Scholar
3Andersson, J. G.. On the principal geological results of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition. Compte Rendu de la Xème Session du Congrès Géologique International, Mexico, 1906. Vol. 10, Pt. 2, 1907, p. 725–33.Google Scholar
4Heim, F.. Geologische Beobachtungen über Süd-Georgien. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde zu Berlin, No. 6, 1912, p. 451–56.Google Scholar
5Ferguson, D., Tyrrell, G. W. and Gregory, J. W.. The geology of South Georgia. Geological Magazine, Vol. 1, Decade 6, 1914, p. 5364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Ferguson, D.. Geological observations in South Georgia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 50, Pt. 4, No. 23, 1915, p. 797814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Tyrrell, G. W.. The petrology of South Georgia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 50, Pt. 4, No. 25, 1915, p. 823–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Gregory, J. W.. The geological relations and some fossils of South Georgia, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 50, Pt. 4, No. 24, 1915, p. 817–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Tyrrell, G. W.. Further notes on the petrography of South Georgia. Geological Magazine, Vol. 3, Decade 6, 1916, p. 435–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Tyrrell, G. W.. Additional notes on the petrography of South Georgia. Geological Magazine, Vol. 5, Decade 6, 1918, p. 483–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Wordie, J. M.. Shackleton Antarctic Expedition, 1914–17: geological observations in the Weddell Sea area. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 53, Pt. 1, No. 2, 1921, p. 1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Douglas, G. V.. Topography and geology of South Georgia. Report on the geological collections made during the voyage of the “Quest”.… London, British Museum (Natural History), 1930, p. 424.Google Scholar
13Gordon, W. T.. A note on Dadoxylon (Araucarioxylon) from the Bay of Isles. Report on the geological collections made during the voyage of the “Quest”.… London, British Museum (Natural History), 1930, p. 2427.Google Scholar
14Tyrrell, G. W.. The petrography and geology of South Georgia. Report on the geological collections made during the voyage of the “Quest”.… London, British Museum (Natural History), 1930, p. 2854.Google Scholar
15Holtedahl, O.. On the geology and physiography of some antarctic and sub-antarctic islands.… Scientific results of the Norwegian Antarctic Expeditions, 1927–28. Oslo, No. 3, 1929.Google Scholar
16Wilckens, O.. Fossilien und Gesteine von Süd-Georgien. Scientific results of the Norwegian Antarctic Expeditions, 1927–28, Oslo, No. 8, 1932.Google Scholar
17Barth, T. F. W.and Holmsen, P.. Rocks from the Antarctandes and the Southern Antilles. Scientific results of the Norwegian Antarctic Expeditions, 1927–28. Oslo, No. 18, 1939.Google Scholar
18Kohl-Larsen, L.. Die Deutsche Süd-Georgien-Expedition, 1928–29. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde zu Berlin, No. 6, 1930, p. 321–50.Google Scholar
19Wilckens, O.. Geologische Ergebnisse der Deutschen Süd-Georgien Expedition Dr Kohl-Larsen 1928–29. Geologische Rundschau, Band 28, 1937, p. 127–28.Google Scholar
20Wilckens, O.. Palaeontologische und geologische Ergebnisse der Reise von Kohl-Larsen (1928–29) nach Süd-Georgien. Abhandlungen der senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, Vol. 474, 1947, p. 175.Google Scholar
21Morrell, B.. A narrative of four voyages.… New York, 1832, p. 66.Google Scholar
22Fanning, E.. Voyages round the world.… London, 1834, p. 440–43.Google Scholar
23Baeckström, O.. Petrographische Beschreibung einiger Basalte von Patagonien, Westantarktika und den Süd-Sandwich-Inseln. Bulletin of the Geological Institution of the University of Upsala, Vol. XIII, Pt. 1, Paper 5, 1915, p. 115–82.Google Scholar
24Filchner, W.. Zum sechsten Erdteil. Berlin, 1922, p. 111.Google Scholar
25Wild, F.. Shackleton's last voyage. London, 1923, p. 85, 347.Google Scholar
26Douglas, G. V.and Smith, W. Campbell. Zavodovski Island, and notes on rock fragments dredged in the Weddell Sea. Report on the geological collections made during the voyage of the “Quest”.… London, British Museum (Natural History), 1930, p. 6367.Google Scholar
27Tyrrell, G. W.. Report on rock specimens from Thule Island, South Sandwich Islands. Discovery Reports, Cambridge, 1931, Vol. 3, p. 191–97.Google Scholar
28Tyrrell, G. W.. Report on rocks from West Antarctica and the Scotia Arc. Discovery Reports, Cambridge, 1941, Vol. 23, p. 37102.Google Scholar
29Miers, J.. Account of the discovery of New South Shetland, with observations on its importance in a geographical, commercial and political point of view: with two plates. Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 3, No. 6, 1820, p. 367–80.Google Scholar
30 Anon. Notizen über das neue sudliche Land. Neue allgemeine geographische (und statistische) Ephemeriden, Vol. 9, Pt. 4, 1821, p. 514–15.Google Scholar
31Traill, T. S.. Mineralogische Notiz von und aus Neu-Süd-Shetland. Neue allgemeine geographische (und statistische) Ephemeriden, Vol. 10, Pt. 1, 1822, p. 99102.Google Scholar
32Weddell, J.. A voyage towards the South Pole, London, 1827, p. 133.Google Scholar
33d'urville, J. S. G. Dumont. Voyage au Pôle Sud.… Histoire du Voyage. Paris, 1842, Tome 1, Pt. 2, p. 142–43.Google Scholar
34Wilkes, C.. Narrative of the United States Exploring Expedition.… Philadelphia, 1844, Vol. 1, p. 140, 148–49.Google Scholar
35Balch, E. S.. Antarctica addenda. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 1904, p. 8384.Google Scholar
36Kendall, E. N.. An account of the island of Deception, one of the New Shetland Isles. Journal of the Royal Geographical Society, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1831, p. 6266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Webster, W. H. B.. Narrative of a voyage to the Southern Atlantic Ocean. London, 1834, Vol. 1, p. 144–45; Vol. 2, p. 300–01.Google Scholar
38Andersson, J. G.. On the geology of Graham Land. Bulletin of the Geological Institute of the University of Upsala, Vol. 7, 19041905, p. 1971.Google Scholar
39Ferguson, D.. Geological observations in the South Shetlands, the Palmer Archipelago, and Graham Land, Antarctica. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 53, Pt. 1, No. 8, 1921, p. 2955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Tyrrell, G. W.. A contribution to the petrography of the South Shetland Islands, the Palmer Archipelago, and the Danco Land Coast, Graham Land, Antarctica. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 53, Pt. 1, No. 4, 1921, p. 5779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Thomas, H. H.. On the Innes Wilson collection of rocks and minerals from the South Shetland Islands and Trinity Island. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 53, Pt. 1, No. 5, 1921, p. 8189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Douglas, G. V.. Geological results of the Shackleton-Rowett (Quest) Expedition. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, Vol. 79, Pt. 1, Proceedings, 1923, p. x–xiii.Google Scholar
43Tilley, C. E.. Petrographical notes on rocks from Elephant Island, South Shetlands. Report on the geological collections made during the voyage of the “Quest”.… London, British Museum (Natural History), 1930, p. 5562.Google Scholar
44Barth, T. F. W.. Notes on igneous and palingenic rocks from the Antarctic Archipelago.… Proceedings of the Sixth Pacific Science Congress (1939), Vol. 2, 1940, p. 747–54.Google Scholar
45Barth, T. F. W.and Kvalheim, A.. Christensenite, a solid solution of nepheline in tridymite. Scientific results of the Norwegian Antarctic Expeditions 1927–28 et sqq. Oslo, No. 22, 1944.Google Scholar
46Webster, W. H. B.. Narrative of a voyage to the Southern Atlantic Ocean in the years 1828, 29, 30.… London, 1834, Vol. 1, p. 144–15; Vol. 2, p. 300–01.Google Scholar
47Ross, J. C.. A voyage of discovery and research in the Southern and Antarctic Regions, during the years 1839–43. London, 1847, Vol. 2, p. 335.Google Scholar
48Prior, G. T.. Petrographical notes on the rock specimens collected in Antarctic regions during the voyage of H.M.S. Erebus and Terror under Sir James Clark Ross, in 1839–43. Mineralogical Magazine, Vol. 12, No. 55, 1899, p. 6991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Geikie, A.. Notes on some specimens of rocks from the Antarctic regions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 22, No. 1, 18971898, p. 6670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Sharman, G.and Newton, E. T.. Note on some fossils from Seymour Island, in the Antarctic regions, obtained by Dr Donald. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 37, Pt. 3, No. 30, 18941895, p. 707–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Sharman, G.. Notes on some additional fossils collected at Seymour Island, Graham's Land, by Dr Donald and Captain Larsen. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 22, No. 1, 18971898, p. 5861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Arctowski, H.. Géographie physique de la région antarctique visitée par l'expédition de la Belgica. Bulletin de la Société Royale Belge de Géographie, Tom. 24, No. 1, 1900, p. 93175.Google Scholar
53Pelikan, M. A.. Petrographische Untersuchung der Gesteinsproben. I. Teil, Résultats du voyage du S.Y. Belgica en 1897–1898–1899. Rapports scientifiques, Géologie. Vol. 1, 1909 p. 149.Google Scholar
54Sistek, D.. Petrographische Untersuchungen der Gesteinsproben. II. Teil. Résultats di voyage du S.Y. Belgica en 1897–1898–1899. Rapports scientifiques, Géologie, Vol. 2, 1912 p. 120.Google Scholar
55Arctowski, H.. Sur l'ancienne extension des glaciers dans la région des terres dé couvertes par l'expédition antarctique belge. Compte Rendu de la 8ème session du Congrès Géologique International. Paris, 1900.Google Scholar
56Arctowski, H.. Sur les glaciers et la géologie des terres découvertes par l'expédition antarctique belge et sur les glaces du Pole Sud. Compte Rendu de la 8ème session du Congrès Géologique International. Paris, 1900, Vol. 8, Pt. 1, 1901, p. 880.Google Scholar
57Weller, S.. The Stokes collection of antarctic fossils. Journal of Geology, Vol. 11, No. 4 1903, p. 413–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Nordenskjöld, O.. Petrographische Untersuchungen aus dem westantarktischer Gebiete. Bulletin of the Geological Institution of the University of Upsala, Vol. 6, Pt. 2, 1905, p. 234–46.Google Scholar
59Nordenskjöld, O.. Die geologischen Beziehungen zwischen Südamerika und der angrenzenden Antarktika. Compte rendu du XIe Congrès Géologique International, 1910, p. 759–65.Google Scholar
60Nordenskjöld, O.. Die Schwedische Südpolar-Expedition und ihre geographische Tätigkeit. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, 1911, Bd. 1, Lief. 1, p. 1232.Google Scholar
61Nordenskjöld, O.. Antarktis. Handbuch der Regionalen Geologie, Heidelberg. Band 8, Abteilung 6, Heft 15, 1913, 129.Google Scholar
62Hallé, T. G.. Om de antarktiska trakternas juraflora. Geologiska Föreningens Förhandlinger, Stockholm, Band 85, Heft 2, No. 289, 1913, p. 105–06.Google Scholar
63Hallé, T. G.. The mesozoic flora of Graham Land. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 8, Lief. 14, 1910.Google Scholar
64Nathorst, A. G.. Sur la flore fossile des régions antarctiques. Compte Rendu des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences (Paris), Tome 138, No. 23, 1904, p. 1447–50.Google Scholar
65Nathorst, A. G.. On the Upper Jurassic flora of Hope Bay, Graham Land. Compte Rendu du Xème Congrès Géologique International, Mexico, 1906, Vol. 10, Pt. 2, 1907, p. 1269–70.Google Scholar
66Buckman, S. S.. Antarctic fossil Brachiopoda collected by the Swedish South Polar Expedition, 1901–03. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 7, 1908, p. 143.Google Scholar
67Dusén, P.. Über die tertiäre Flora der Seymour-Insel. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 8, 1908, p. 127.Google Scholar
68Felix, M. J.. Über die fossilen Korallen der Snow Hill-Insel und Seymour-Insel. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Bd. 3, Lief. 5, 1909, p. 115.Google Scholar
69Gothan, W.. Die fossilen Hölzer von der Seymour- und Snow Hill-insel. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Sudpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3. Lief. 8, 1908, p. 133.Google Scholar
70Hennig, H.. Le conglomérat pleistocène à Pecten de l'île Cockburn. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 10, 1911, p. 173.Google Scholar
71Holland, K.. The fossil Foraminifera. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 9, 1910, p. 111.Google Scholar
72Kilian, W.. Sur une faune d'ammonites néocrétacée, recueillie par l'expédition antarctique suédoise. Compte rendu des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences (Paris), Tome 142, No. 5, 1906, p. 306–08.Google Scholar
73Kilian, W.and Reboul, P.. Sur une faune néocrétacée des régions antarctiques. Compte rendu de l'association française pour l'avancement des sciences, 1909, p. 440–53.Google Scholar
74Kilian, W.and Reboul, P.. Les Céphalopodes néocrétacés des îles Seymour et Snow-Hill. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 6, 1909, p. 175.Google Scholar
75Lambert, J.. Les echinides fossiles des iles Snow-Hill et Seymour. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 11, 1910, p. 115.Google Scholar
76Smith-Woodward, A.. On fossil fish-remains from Snow Hill and Seymour Islands. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 8, Lief. 4, 1908, p. 14.Google Scholar
77Wilckens, O.. Die Anneliden, Bivalven und Gastropoden der antarktischen Kreideformation. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 12, 1910, p. 1132.Google Scholar
78Wilckens, O.. Die Mollusken der antarktischen Tertiärformation. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 13, 1912, p. 142.Google Scholar
79Wiman, C.. Vorläufige Mitteilung über die alttertiären Vertebraten der Seymourinsel. Bulletin of the Geological Institution of the University of Upsala, Vol. 6, Pt. 2, No. 12, 1905, p. 249–52.Google Scholar
80Wiman, C.. Über die alttertiären Vertebraten der Seymourinsel. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 1, 1905, p. 137.Google Scholar
81Bodman, G.. Petrographische Studien über einige antarktische Gesteine. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–03, Stockholm, Bd. 3, Lief. 15, 1916, p. 1100.Google Scholar
82Gourdon, E.. Les roches éruptives grenues de la Terre de Graham recueillies par l'expédition antarctique du Dr Charcot. Compte rendu des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Tome 141, No. 24, 1905, p. 1036–38.Google Scholar
83Gourdon, E.. Les roches microlithiques de la Terre de Graham recueillies par l'expédition antarctique du Dr Charcot. Compte rendu des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Tome 43, No. 3, 1906, p. 178–80.Google Scholar
84Gourdon, E.. Sur un microgranite alcalin recueilli sur la Terre de Graham par l'expédition antarctique du Dr Charcot. Compte rendu des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Tome 144, No. 22, 1907, p. 1224–26.Google Scholar
85Gourdon, E.. Géographie physique, Glaciologie, Pétrographie des régions visitées par l'Expédition Antarctique Française commandée par le Dr Charcot. Paris, 1908.Google Scholar
86Gourdon, E.. Sur deux gisements des zéolites dans l'Antarctique. Compte rendu des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Tome 151, No. 2, 1910, p. 153–54.Google Scholar
87Gourdon, E.. Sur la constitution minéralogique des Shetlands du Sud (île Déception). Compte rendu des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Tome 158, No. 8, 1914, p. 583–86.Google Scholar
88Gourdon, E.. Sur la constitution minéralogique des Shetlands du Sud. Compte rendu des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Tome 158, No. 25, 1914, p. 1905–07.Google Scholar
89Gourdon, E.. Sur la constitution minéralogique de l'île Jenny (Antarctique). Compte rendu des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Tome 159, No. 5, 1914, p. 869–71.Google Scholar
90Gourdon, E.. Minéralogie-géologie. Deuxième Expédition Antarctique Française 1908–1910. Documents scientifiques. Paris. 1917.Google Scholar
91Gourdon, E.. Relación de los trabajos de geología y glaciología, ejecutados en la Antártída por la misión a orden del Doctor Charcot (1908–10). Boletin del instituto geográfico argentino, Vol. 24, 1919, p. 128–38.Google Scholar
92Stewart, D.. Petrography of some rocks from the South Orkney Islands and the Antarctic Archipelago. American Mineralogist, Vol. 22, No. 8, 1937, 178–94.Google Scholar
93Stewart, D.. Igneous rocks of the Melchior Islands, Antarctica. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 53, No. 12, 1942, p. 1809.Google Scholar
94Stewart, D.. Iteliminary report on some intrusives of the Melchior Islands, Antarctica. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 89, No. 1, 1945, p. 146–47.Google Scholar
95Stewart, D.. Rocks of the Melchior Islands, Antarctica. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 91, No. 3, 1947, p. 229–33.Google Scholar
96Fleming, W. L. S. et al. Notes on the scientific work of the British Graham Land Expedition, 1934–37. Geographical Journal, Vol. 91, No. 6, 1938, p. 508–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
97Fleming, W. L. S.. Relic glacial forms on the western seaboard of Graham Land, Geographical Journal, Vol. 96, No. 2, 1940, p. 95100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98Knowles, P. H.. Geology of southern Palmer Peninsula, Antarctica. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 89, No. 1, 1945, p. 132–45.Google Scholar
99Knowles, P. H.. Glaciology of Southern Palmer Peninsula, Antarctica. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 89, No. 1, 1945, p. 174–76.Google Scholar
100Weddell, J.. A voyage towards the South Pole. London, 1825, p. 42.Google Scholar
101d'Urville, J. S. C. Dumont. Voyage au Pôle Sud, Histoire du Voyage, Paris, 1842, Vol. 2, p. 70, 316–17.Google Scholar
102Pirie, J. H. H.. First Antarctic voyage of the Scotia. V. Note on the geology of the South Orkneys. Scottish Geographical Magazine, Vol. 20, 1904, p. 130.Google Scholar
103Pirie, J. H. H.. On the Graptolite-bearing rocks of the South Orkneys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 25, Pt. 6, 1905, p. 463–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
104Pirie, J. H. H.. Geology of the South Orkneys, 1–10. Unpublished Scottish National Antarctic Expedition Report.Google Scholar
105Pirie, J. H. H.. Glaciology of the South Orkneys: Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 49, Pt. 4, No. 15, 1913, p. 831–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
106Tilley, C. E.. Report on rocks from the South Orkney Islands. Discovery Reports, Cambridge, 1935, Vol. 10, p. 383–90.Google Scholar