Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:29:21.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forms of time in Alaska natural gas development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2011

Arthur Mason
Arthur Mason*
Affiliation:
Energy and Resources Group, 310 Barrows Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3050, USA ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Energy companies and builders of energy transportation infrastructure find it difficult to evaluate Arctic natural gas development. Their business critical decisions require the assessment of not just technical risks but intangible issues regarding the future and past interactions of an energy system. These concerns call attention to the problem of time. In this article, I examine three types of time from which efforts to commercialise Alaska natural gas are drawn into the temporality of global energy markets: (1) volatility time, in which price spikes determine outcome; (2) government time, in which law and regulation assist in commercial enterprise, and; (3) entrepreneurial time, in which individuals of industry take initiative. These types of expectation in Alaska natural gas development correspond consequently to three methods for fixing time and space. In short, they are three development time-spaces or chronotopes. By offering these forms of time, taking place between 2000–2005, this article draws attention to concrete visualisations of constructing a pipeline to deliver natural gas from Alaska to continental United States. I argue that these efforts represent precise and well-marked steps and reflect a specific course of development, passing from self-confident ignorance, to self-reflective consultation and finally to genuine understanding.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 42 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABR. (Alaska Budget Report). 2001. Overview. Juneau: State of Alaska (Alaska Budget Report 3(2)): 3.Google Scholar
ANGTA. (Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Act). 2001. Staff report of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Washington, D.C.: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (18 January 2001).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ewald, F. 1991. Insurance and risks. In: Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (editors). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf: 197–210.Google Scholar
Fairgrove, J. 2003. Presentation before the Alaska legislature. Washington D.C. (unpublished public statements 12 January 2003).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1984. Nietzche, genealogy, history. In: Rabinow, P. (editor). The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books: 76–100.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. 2004. Franklin's conjecture. Isis 95: 460–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, M., and Newkumet, C.. 2000. An Alaskan gas pipeline? Maybe not a wild idea after all. Inside FERC: 12 June 2000.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. 2004. Futures past. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Koonze, T. 2003. Presentation to Alaska Governor Frank Murkowski. Juneau (unpublished statements 11 March 2003).Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. 2004. Presentation to Arctic Gas Conference, Calgary, 2–5 March 2004 (unpublished statements 3 March 2004).Google Scholar
Mason, A. 2006. Images of the energy future. Environmental Research Letters 1: 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, R. 2001. Knowles taps state's gas line experts. Alaska Journal of Commerce 11 March 2001.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. 1993. Tendencies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. 2005. Friction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, B. 1997. Orientalism, postmodernism and globalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Meurs, P. 2003. Presentation to the Office of the Alaska Governor. Juneau (unpublished statements 25 March 2003).Google Scholar