Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T00:10:24.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental management on King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Colin M. Harris
Colin M. Harris
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper proposes management responses to problems perceived in an earlier paper on King George Island (Polar Record 27(162): 193–204, 1991). Available management instruments and barriers to solutions are reviewed, and new management approaches and tools postulated. The category of Antarctic Protected Area (APA) is proposed for areas needing special protection, with sub-designations of Natural, Scientific and Historic Reserves. Multiple-use Planning Areas (MPAs) are endorsed for areas of high use needing local and regional planning, including station environs, but with sub-designations Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Scientific Research Sites and Facilities Areas. Both APAs and MPAs will require management plans: APAs will be accessible only by entry permit. Also recommended are a scientific and logistic register, scheduled meetings among station commanders, development of an internationally coordinated regional scientific strategy, and an environmental information system. To manage tourism a commercial tourism licence system and tourist levy are recommended, with the industry controlled under management plans developed for APAs and MPAs, plus general Treaty provisions. Workload arising from these revisions would necessitate the Committee on Environmental Protection in the forthcoming Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, with a permanent Treaty secretariat. This framework, requiring a multinational approach to management more sophisticated than has so far been achieved under the Antarctic Treaty, would improve and coordinate management throughout Antarctica.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 27 , Issue 163 , October 1991 , pp. 313 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASOC. 1990. The Convention on Antarctic Conservation. ASOC Information Paper 1990–1. Washington, ASOC.Google Scholar
ATCPs. 1990a. Final report of the Fifteenth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting; Paris, 9–20 October 1989. Paris, Republic of France.Google Scholar
ATCPs. 1990b. Interim report of the 11th Antarctic Treaty Special Consultative Meeting; Viña del Mar, 19 Nov. – 6 Dec 1990. Santiago, Republic of Chile.Google Scholar
ATCPs. 1991. Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (plus annexes and annex proposals). From the 11th Antarctic Treaty Special Consultative Meeting; Madrid, 22–30 April, 17–23 June 1991. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Barinaga, M. and Lindley, D. 1989. Wrecked ship causes damage to the Antarctic ecosystem. Nature 337: 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. N. 1991. Protection of the environment in Antarctica: are present regimes enough? In Jørgensen-Dahl, A. and Østreng, W. (editors) The Antarctic Treaty System in world politics. London, MacMillan: 186–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, P. J. 1986. The international politics of Antarctica. London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Beck, P.J. 1991. Antarctica, Viña del Mar and the 1990 UN debate. Polar Record 27(162): 211–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeby, C. D. 1991. The Antarctic Treaty System: goals, performance and impact. In Jørgensen-Dahl, A. and Østreng, W. (editors) The Antarctic Treaty System in world politics. London, MacMillan: 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benninghoff, W. and Bonner, W. 1985. Man's impact on the Antarctic environment: a procedure for evaluating the impacts from scientific / logistic activities. Cambridge, SCAR, Scott Polar Research Institute.Google Scholar
Bonner, W. N. 1987. Recent developments in Antarctic conservation. In Triggs, G. D. (editor) The Antarctic Treaty regime: law, environment and resources. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 143–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, W. N. and Smith, R. I. L. 1988. An assessment of environmental impacts arising from scientific research and its logistic support at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Unpublished report for the British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, Natural Environment Research Council.Google Scholar
British Antarctic Survey. 1989. Proposed construction of airstrip at Rothera Point, Antarctica: final comprehensive environmental evaluation. Swindon, Natural Environment Research Council.Google Scholar
Child, J. 1988. Antarctica and South American geopolitics: frozen lebensraum. New York, Praeger.Google Scholar
COMNAP (Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programmes). 1990. Visitors'guide to the Antarctic/Visits to scientific stations in Antarctica. Washington, National Science Foundation 90–147.Google Scholar
Culik, B., Adelung, D. and Woakes, A. J. 1990. The effect of disturbance on the heart rate and behaviour of Adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) during the breeding season. In Kerry, K. R. and Hempel, G. (editors) Antarctic ecosystems: ecological change and conservation. Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, A. 1990. In the wake of the Exxon Valdez: the devastating impact of the Alaska oil spill. San Francisco, Sierra Club.Google Scholar
Elzinga, A. and Bohlin, I. 1989. The politics of science in polar regions. Ambio 18(1): 71–6.Google Scholar
Enzenbacher, D.J. 1991. A policy for Antarctic tourism: conflict or cooperation. M.Phil, thesis in Polar Studies. Cambridge, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fifield, R. 1987. International research In the Antarctic. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. J. and Keage, P. L. 1987. Protected area marker for polar use. Polar Record 23(147): 716–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, V. 1983. Antarctica: its history and development. In Vicuña, F. O. (editor) Antarctic resources policy: scientific, legal and political issues. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, C. M. 1991a. Environmental effects of human activities on King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Record 27(162): 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. M. 1991b. The Antarctic Digital Database Project: a new tool for Antarctic environmental science and management. Polar Record 27(162): 260–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headland, R. K. and Keage, P. L. 1985. Activities on the King George Island Group, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Record 22(140): 475–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, J. (editor) 1990. Handbook of the Antarctic Treaty System, Seventh Edition. London, Foreign and Commonwealth Office.Google Scholar
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). 1991. A strategy for Antarctic conservation. Gland and Cambridge, IUCN.Google Scholar
Keage, P. L. 1986. Antarctic protected areas: future options. Environmental Studies Occasional Paper 19. University of Tasmania, Hobart.Google Scholar
Kriwoken, L. K. 1991 Antarctic environmental planning and management: conclusions from Casey, Australian Antarctic Territory. Polar Record 27(160): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriwoken, L. K. and Keage, P. L. 1987. Antarctic environmental politics: protected areas. Hobart, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
Laws, R.M. 1991. Unacceptable threats to Antarctic science. New Scientist 129(1762):4.Google Scholar
Logan, H. 1986. The development of an environmental review process for the New Zealand Antarctic Research Programme. New Zealand Antarctic Record 7(1): 12–14.Google Scholar
Manheim, B.S. 1990. Paradise lost? The need for environmental regulation of tourism in Antarctica. Washington, Environmental Defense Fund.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 1980. US Antarctic Program final environmental impact statement. Washington, Division of Polar Programs.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 1988. Environmental assessment, construction of a replacement science facility at McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Washington, Division of Polar Programs.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 1990. Draft supplemental environmental impact statement for the United States Antarctic Program. Washington, Division of Polar Programs.Google Scholar
Naveen, R. 1989. Antarctica, the impact of a tragedy. Antarctic Century 3 (04).Google Scholar
Naveen, R., de Roy, T., Jones, M. and Monteath, C. 1989. Antarctic Travelers Code. Antarctic Century 4(07–10): 5–6.Google Scholar
Parsons, A. (editor) 1989. Antarctica: the next decade. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rounsevell, D. and Binns, D. 1991. Mass deaths of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonica) at Lusitania Bay, Macquarie Island. Aurora 10(4): 8–9.Google Scholar
SCAR. 1980. A visitor's introduction to the Antarctic environment. Cambridge, SCAR, Scott Polar Research Institute.Google Scholar
SCAR. 1991a. Interim report of the Xlth Antarctic Treaty Special Consultative Meeting. SCAR Report 6.Google Scholar
SCAR. 1991b. Report of the SCAR Group of Specialists on Environmental Affairs and Conservation (GOSEAC) on a meeting at the University of Sāo Paulo, Sāo Paulo, Brazil, 9–13 July, 1990. SCAR Report 7 [forthcoming].Google Scholar
SCAR. 1991c. Report of the Working Group on Geology. SCAR Bulletin 101, in Polar Record 27(161): 185.Google Scholar
Sievers, J. and Bennat, H. 1989. Reference systems of maps and geographic information systems for Antarctica. Antarctic Science 1(4): 351–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, O.S. 1991. The relevance of the Antarctic Treaty System as a model for international cooperation. In Jørgensen-Dahl, A. and Østreng, W. (editors) The Antarctic Treaty System in world politics. London, MacMillan: 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonehouse, B. 1990. A traveler's code for Antarctic visitors. Polar Record 26(156): 56–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicuña, F. O. 1987. The Antarctic Treaty System: a viable alternative for the regulation of resource-oriented activities. In Triggs, G. D. (editor) The Antarctic Treaty regime: law, environment and resources. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, D. W. H. and Morris, E. M. 1990. Science, environment and resources in Antarctica. Applied Geography 10: 265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, E. C. 1991. Critical ecosystems and nature conservation in Antarctica. In Harris, C. M. and Stonehouse, B. (editors) Antarctica and global climatic change. London, Belhaven Press: 117–46.Google Scholar