Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:46:54.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vocabularies for human development: Arctic politics and the power of knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2014

Heidi Sinevaara-Niskanen
Heidi Sinevaara-Niskanen*
Affiliation:
Unit for Gender Studies, Faculty of Education, University of Lapland, P.O. Box 122, 96101 RovaniemiFinland ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Arctic Council (AC) has been accorded the status of knowledge holder and knowledge provider for the Arctic region. This paper probes the broader definition-making power of Arctic knowledge, challenging the common notion that this knowledge is value neutral. It argues that attention should be paid to the ways in which power is exercised in, and though, the various reports and assessments published under the auspices of the AC. The specific focus of the paper is human development and gender as an aspect of that development. The research analyses the Arctic Human Development Report (AHDR) in order to examine the ways in which knowledge defines human development and its agents in the Arctic. The paper draws on Foucault-inspired and feminist approaches to analyse three vocabularies of rule in particular: strength of the community, vulnerability and the need for adaptation. These vocabularies are coexistent and share an emphasis on communities. Yet, questions of gender seldom figure in them, a lack of salience that reveals the power of the partiality of knowledge. The politics of knowledge operate by placing in the foreground only certain accounts of Arctic development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 191 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, N.W. 2000. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography 24 (3): 347–364.Google Scholar
Adger, W.N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 268–281.Google Scholar
Adger, W.N. and Kelly, M.P.. 1999. Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4: 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AHDR (Arctic human development report). 2004. Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute.Google Scholar
AC (Arctic Council). 2009. SDWG report on Arctic energy. Arctic Council, Sustainable Development Working Group. URL: http://portal.sdwg.org/media.php?mid=1012 (accessed 10 June 2009).Google Scholar
AC (Arctic Council). 2013. Arctic resilience interim report. Stockholm: Stockholm Environmental Institute and Stockholm Resilience Centre. URL: http://www.arctic-council.org/arr/.(accessed 17 November 2012).Google Scholar
Allen, A. 2008. The politics of our selves. Power, autonomy, and gender in contemporarycritical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, A. 2002. Power, subjectivity, and agency: between Arendt and Foucault. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (2): 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, E., Jahn, T. and Stiess, I.. 1999. Exploring uncommon ground: sustainability and the social sciences. In: Becker, E. and Jahn, T. (editors). Sustainability and social sciences. A cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation. London: Zed Books: 1–22.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R., Charkiewicz, E., Häusler, S. and Wieringa, S.. 1994. Women, environment and sustainable development. Towards a theoretical synthesis. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Bruyninckx, H. 2006. Sustainable development: the institutionalization of a contested policy concept. In: Betsill, M.M., Hochstetler, K. and Stevis, D. (editors). International environmental politics. London: Palgrave: 265–298.Google Scholar
Bröckling, U., Krasmann, S. and Lemke, T.. 2011. From Foucault's lectures at the Collège de France to studies of governmentality: an introduction. In: Bröckling, U.; Krasmann, S. and Lemke, T. (editors). Governmentality. Current issues and future challenges. New York: Routledge: 1–33.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. 2006. Democratizing global environmental governance? Stakeholder democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development. European Journal of International Relations 12 (4): 467–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. 2004. Scientisation vs. civic expertise in environmental governance: eco-feminist, eco-modern and post-modern responses. Environmental Politics 13: 695–714.Google Scholar
Burchell, G. 1996. Liberal government and techniques of the self. In: Barry, A., Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (editors). Foucault and political reason. Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government. London: University College London: 19–36.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 2004. Precarious life. The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J. and Krook, M. L. 2008. Rethinking women's substantive representation. Representation 44 (2): 99–110.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, B. 1999. The will to empower. Democratic citizens and other subjects. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Death, C. 2010. Governing sustainable development. Partnerships, protests and power at the World Summit. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, M. 1995. Sovereignty and governmentality: from the problematics of the ‘new world order’ to the ethical problematic of the world order. Alternatives 20 (3): 323–368.Google Scholar
Dodds, K. 2012. Anticipating the Arctic and the Arctic Council: pre-emption, precaution and preparedness. In: Axworthy, T.S., Koivurova, T and Hasanat, W. (editors). The Arctic Council: its place in the future of Arctic governance. Toronto: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation: 1–28.Google Scholar
Duffield, M. 2007. Development, security and unending war. Governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Eikjok, J. 2007. Gender, essentialism and feminism in Samiland. In: Green, J. (editor). Making space for indigenous feminism. London: Zed Books: 108–123.Google Scholar
Evans, B. and Reid, J.. 2014. Resilient life. The art of living dangerously. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finland. 2002. Taking wing. 2002. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (conference report).Google Scholar
Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 253–267.Google Scholar
Ford, J.D. and Furgal, C.. 2009. Foreword to the special issue: climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability in the Arctic. Polar Research 28 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1978. The history of sexuality. An introduction. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. 2003. From discipline to flexibilization? Rereading Foucault in the shadow of globalization. Constellations 10 (2): 160–171.Google Scholar
Gallopin, G.C. 2006. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 293–303.Google Scholar
Glomsrød, S. and Aslaksen, J. (editors). 2008. The economy of the north II. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
Griffin, P. 2010. Gender, governance and the global political economy. Australian Journal of International Affairs 64 (1): 86–104Google Scholar
Handmer, J.W., Dovers, S. and Downing, T.E.. 1999. Societal vulnerability to climate change and variability. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4 (3): 267–281.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 2000. Gender, development, and post-enlightenment philosophies of science. In: Narayan, U. and Harding, S. (editors). Decentering the center. Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 240–261.Google Scholar
Heininen, L. 2011. Arctic strategies and policies. Inventory and comparative study. Rovaniemi: Northern Research Forum.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2012. Feminist research: exploring, interrogating and transforming the interconnections of epistemology, methodology and method. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N. (editor). Handbook of feminist research. Theory and praxis (2nd edn). London: Sage Publications: 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, V. 2001. Calculating climate: advanced liberalism and the governing of risk in Australian drought management. Journal of Sociology 37 (3): 299–316.Google Scholar
Hovelsrud, G.K. and Smit, B.. (editors) 2010. Community adaptation and vulnerability in Arctic regions. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Hønneland, G. and Stokke, O.S.. 2007. Introduction. In: Stokke, O.S. and Hønneland, G. (editors). International cooperation and Arctic governance. Regime effectiveness and northern region building. New York: Routledge: 1–12.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. 2010. The limits of governmentality: social theory and the international. European Journal of International Relations 16 (2): 223–246.Google Scholar
Kankaanpää, P. 2012. Knowledge structures of the Arctic Council: for sustainable development. In: Axworthy, T.S., Koivurova, T. and Hasanat, W. (editors). The Arctic Council: its place in the future of Arctic governance. Toronto: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation: 83–112.Google Scholar
Kiersey, N. J., Weidner, J.R. and Rosenow, D.. 2010. Response to Chandler. Global Society 24 (2): 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keskitalo, E.C.H. 2008. Climate change and globalization in the Arctic. An integrated approach to vulnerability assessment. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Keskitalo, E.C.H. 2002. Constructing ’the Arctic’. Discourses of international region-building. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T., Keskitalo, E.C.H. and Bankes, N.. (editors) 2008. Climate governance in the Arctic. London: Springer Environment and Policy.Google Scholar
Larner, W. 2005. Neoliberalism in (regional) theory and practice: the stronger communities action fund in New Zealand. Geographical Research 43 (1): 9–18.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M. 2004. The environmental-social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecological Economics 49 (2): 199–214.Google Scholar
Lindroth, M. and Sinevaara-Niskanen, H.. 2013. At the crossroads of autonomy and essentialism: indigenous peoples in international environmental politics. International Political Sociology 7 (3): 275–293.Google Scholar
Longino, H.E. 1993. Subjects, power, and knowledge: description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (editors). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge: 101–120.Google Scholar
Martello, M.L. 2008. Arctic indigenous peoples as representations and representatives of climate change. Social Studies of Science 38 (3): 351–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeil, M. 1993. Dancing with Foucault. Feminism and power-knowledge. In: Ramazanoglu, C. (editor). Up against Foucault. Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and feminism. London: Routledge: 147–178.Google Scholar
Moller Okin, S. 2005. Multiculturalism and feminism: no simple question, no simple answer. In: Eisenberg, A. and Spinner-Halev, J. (editors). Minorities within minorities. Equality, rights and diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 67–89.Google Scholar
Neumann, I.B. and Sending, J.. 2010. Governing the global polity. Practice, mentality, rationality. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. E. 2012. Knowing the Arctic: The Arctic Council as a cognitive forerunner. In: Axworthy, T.S.; Koivurova, T. and Hasanat, W. (editors). The Arctic Council: its place in the future of Arctic governance. Toronto: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation: 83–112.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A.E. 2009. A changing Arctic climate: more than just weather. In: Shadian, J.M. and Tennberg, M. (editors). Legacies and change in polar science. Historical, legal and political reflections on the International Polar Year. Surrey: Ashgate 9–33.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A.E. 2007. A changing Arctic climate. Science and policy in the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
Njåstad, B.; Kelman, I. and Rosenberg, S. (editors). 2009. Vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in the Arctic (VACCA). Tromsø: Norwegian Polar Institute.Google Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers. 2010. Arctic social indicators. 2010. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
Oksala, J. 2002. Freedom in the philosophy of Michel Foucault. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Parpart, J.L., Rai, M. S. and Staudt, K.. 2002. Rethinking em(power)ment, gender and development: an introduction. In: Parpart, J.L., Rai, M.S. and Staudt, K. (editors). Rethinking empowerment. Gender and development in a global/local world. London: Routledge: 3–21.Google Scholar
Poppel, B., Kruse, J., Duhaime, G. and Abryutina, L.. 2007. SLiCA results. Anchorage: University of Alaska Anchorage, Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Redclift, M. 1999. Sustainability and sociology: northern preoccupations. In: Becker, E. and Jahn, T. (editors). Sustainability and social sciences. A cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation. London: Zed Books: 59–73.Google Scholar
Redclift, M. 1987. Sustainable development: exploring the contradictions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reid, J. 2012. The disastrous and politically debased subject of resilience. Development Dialogue 58: 67–79.Google Scholar
Rose, N. 1999. The powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, S. 2007. Green governmentality: insights and opportunities in the study of nature's rule. Progress in Human Geography 31 (3): 291–307.Google Scholar
Sawicki, J. 1991. Foucault and feminism: toward a politics of difference. In Shanley, M.L. and Pateman, C. (editors). Feminist interpretations and political theory. Cambridge: Polity Press: 215–231.Google Scholar
Schofield, B. 2002. Partners in power: governing the self-sustaining community. Sociology 36 (3): 663–683.Google Scholar
Sending, J. and Neumann, I.B.. 2006. Governance to governmentality: analyzing NGOs, states, and power. International Studies Quarterly 50 (3): 651–672.Google Scholar
Shadian, J.M. 2009. Revisiting politics and science in the poles: IPY and the governance of science in post-Westphalia. In: Shadian, J.M. and Tennberg, M. (editors). Legacies and change in polar science. Historical, legal and political reflections on the International Polar Year. Surrey: Ashgate: 35–62.Google Scholar
Shadian, J.M. and Tennberg, M.. (editors) 2009. Legacies and change in polar science. Historical, legal and political reflections on the International Polar Year. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Shani, G. 2012. Empowering the disposable? Biopolitics, race and human development. Development Dialogue 58: 99–113.Google Scholar
Sinevaara-Niskanen, H. 2012. Gender, economy and development in the north. In: Tennberg, M. (editor). Politics of development in the Barents region. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press: 362–377.Google Scholar
Sinevaara-Niskanen, H. and Tennberg, M.. 2012. Responsibilisation for adaptation. In: Tennberg, M. (editor). Governing the uncertain: adaptation and climate in Russia and Finland. London: Springer: 125–136.Google Scholar
Sloan, L., Kafarowski, J., Heilmann, A., Karlsdóttir, A., Udén, M., Angell, E. and Moen Erlandsen, M.. 2004. Women's participation in decisions-making processes in Arctic fisheries resource management. Norfold: Kvinneuniversitetet Nord.Google Scholar
Smit, B. and Wandel, J.. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 282–292.Google Scholar
Staudt, K. 2008. Gendering development. In: Goertz, G. and Mazur, A.G. (editors). Politics, gender and concepts: theory and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 136–158.Google Scholar
St. Denis, V. 2007. Feminism is for everybody: aboriginal women, feminism and diversity. In: Green, J. (editor). Making space for indigenous feminism. London: Zed Books: 33–52.Google Scholar
Stokke, O.S. 2007. Examining the consequences of Arctic institutions. In: Stokke, O.S. and Hønneland, G. (editors). International cooperation and Arctic governance. Regime effectiveness and northern region building. New York: Routledge: 12–26.Google Scholar
Summerville, J.A., Adkins, B.A. and Kendall, G.. 2008. Community participation, rights, and responsibilities: the governmentality of sustainable development policy in Australia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 (4): 696–711.Google Scholar
Tennberg, M. 2012. Adaptation as a governance practice. In: Tennberg, M. (editor). Governing the uncertain: adaptation and climate in Russia and Finland. London: Springer: 17–38.Google Scholar
Tennberg, M. 2009. Three spirals of power/knowledge: scientific laboratories, environmental panopticons and emerging biopolitics. In: Shadian, J.M. and Tennberg, M. (editors). Legacies and change in polar science. Historical, legal and political reflections on the International Polar Year. Surrey: Ashgate: 189–200.Google Scholar
Tennberg, M. 1998. The Arctic Council. A study in governmentality. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.Google Scholar
Tennberg, M., Espiritu, A.A., Riabova, L. and Reid, J.. 2012. Conclusions and some suggestions for future research. In: Tennberg, M. (editor). Politics of development in the Barents region. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press: 378–386.Google Scholar
Winograd, M. 2007. Sustainability and vulnerability indicators for decision making: lessons learned from Honduras. International Journal of Sustainable Development 10 (1–2): 93–105.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. 1998. Creating regimes: Arctic accords and international governance. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar