Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:49:39.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Churchill Peaks and the politics of naming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Fae L. Korsmo  and
Michael P. Sfraga
Fae L. Korsmo
Affiliation:
University of Alaska Fairbanks, Department of Political Science, P.O. Box 756420, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA, and Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, USA
Michael P. Sfraga
Affiliation:
Office of the President, University of Alaska, P.O. Box 755000, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The highest mountain in North America bears two official names. While most visitors to Denali National Park in Alaska are familiar with the mountain's official name ‘McKinley,’ and with the frequently used Athabaskan name ‘Denali,’ the mountain also has a second official name: Churchill Peaks. This article traces the history and politics of naming Alaska's famous mountain, including the events that led to the addition of Churchill Peaks. Those events began when President Lyndon Johnson was unable to attend Winston Churchill's funeral in January 1965. The resulting controversy surrounding the naming of the great mountain reflects the ambiguous and often troubled relations between the national government and the remote northern periphery of the country.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 36 , Issue 197 , April 2000 , pp. 131 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, F.G. 1995. Geographic names of the Antarctic: names approved by the United States Board on Geographic Names. Second edition. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Basso, K. 1996. Wisdom sits in places. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, A.H. 1911. The Mount McKinley region, Alaska. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Brooks, A.H. 1953. Blazing Alaska's trails. Fairbanks: University of Alaska and Arctic Institute of North America.Google Scholar
Brown, W.E. 1991. A history of the Denali–Mount McKinley region, Alaska. Santa Fe: US National Park Service, Southwest Regional Office.Google Scholar
Browne, B. 1956. The conquest of Mount McKinley. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Fair, S.W. 1999. Place-name studies from the Saniq Coast. Arctic Research of the United States 13: 25–32.Google Scholar
Canada, Geomatics, Natural Resources Canada. 1999. Castle Mountain controversy. http://geonames.nrcan.gc.ca/cgndb/cent/english/commemorate.html.Google Scholar
Library, Glenbow. 1998. This week in Canadian history, February 28–03 6. http://www.glenbow.ab.ca/libhtm/feb28.htm.Google Scholar
Hammond, P.Y. 1992. LBJ and the presidential management of foreign relations. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Harley, J.B. 1988. Maps, knowledge, and power. In: Cosgrove, D., and Daniels, S. (editors). The iconography of landscape: essays on the symbolic representation, design, and use of past environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 277–312.Google Scholar
Johnson, L.B. 1965. Presidential statement on approving the designation of the north and south peaks of Mount McKinley in honor of Sir Winston Churchill. Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents 1 (14): 429.Google Scholar
Kari, J. 1986. The Tenada–Denali–Mount McKinley controversy. Names 34 (3): 347–351.Google Scholar
Korsmo, F.L. 1992. Empowerment or termination. Unpublished PhD thesis. Albuquerque: Department of Political Science, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Korsmo, F.L. 1993. Evaluation, tribal sovereignty, and the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. In: McClain, P. (editor). Minority group influence: agenda setting, formulation, and public policy. Westport and London: Greenwood Press: 83–107.Google Scholar
Michael, H. (editor). 1967. Lieutenant Zagoskin's travels in Russian America 1842–1844: the first ethnographic and geographic investigations in the Yukon and Koskokwim valleys of Alaska. Toronto: Arctic Institute of North America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. 1967. Mount McKinley: the pioneer climbs. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
Orth, D.J. 1984. The mountain was wronged: the story of the naming of Mt Rainer and other domestic names activities of the US Board on Geographic Names. Names 32 (4): 428–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orth, D.J., and Payne, R.L. 1997. Principles, policies, and procedures: domestic geographic names. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, http://mapping.usgs.gov/www/gnis/pppdgn.html.Google Scholar
Rabbit, M. 1979. Minerals, land, and geology for the common defense and general welfare. Washington, DC: US Govenment Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sfraga, M.P. 1997. Distant vistas: Bradford Washburn, expeditionary science, and landscape, 1930–1960. Unpublished PhD thesis. Fairbanks: Department of Northern Studies, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Spurr, J. 1900. A reconnaissance in southeastern Alaska in 1898: twentieth annual report of the United States Geological Survey. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Stuck, H. 1914. The ascent of Denali: a narrative of the first complete ascent of the highest peak in North America. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, T.F. 1999. What's in a name? Indigenous place names in southeast Alaska. Arctic Research of the United States 13: 40–48.Google Scholar
Tikhmenev, P.A. 1978. A history of the Russian–American Company. Pierce, R., and Donnelly, A. (translators and editors). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
US Board on Geographic Names. Churchill Peaks File. Reston, VA.Google Scholar
US Board on Geographic Names. Mount Churchill File. Reston, VA.Google Scholar
US Congress. House of Representatives. 1999. Introduction of a bill to re-name Mount McKinley as Denali, Hon. Don Young. CongressionalRecord 14 05 1999: E964.Google Scholar
US Geological Survey. 1964. Mt McKinley (A-3), Alaska, N6300 – W15100/15×30, originally mapped by the Geological Survey and the Museum of Science, Boston, MA, in 1954. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
US Geological Survey. 1978. Mt McKinley (A-3), Alaska, N6300 – W15100/15x30, originally mapped by the Geological Survey and the Museum of Science, Boston, MA, in 1954. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Vanstone, J.W. (editor). 1959. Russian exploration in interior Alaska: an extract from the journal of Andrei Glazunov. Pacific Northwest Quarterly 50 (2): 37–47.Google Scholar
Washburn, B., Kasper, H., and Huber, E.. 1960. Mount McKinley, Alaska: a reconnaissance topographic map by Bradford Washburn. Waben: Neue Zuher Zeitung.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. 1971. The Labour government 1964–1970: a personal record. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Wrangell, F.P. von. 1839. Statistical and ethnographic information on the Russian possessions in the northwest coast of America. St. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar