Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:30:35.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Is the New Redistribution?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Anahid Nersessian
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

About six years ago I was having lunch with a colleague who ended our conversation by announcing that she was headed over to a symposium on Lucretius and modernity. “You don't sound too enthusiastic,” I said. “Well,” she sighed, “it's the new good materialism, right?”

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 132 , Issue 5 , October 2017 , pp. 1220 - 1225
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Eduard. “The heory of Collapse and Colonial Policy.” Marxism and Social Democracy: The Revisionist Debate, 1896–1898, edited and translated by Henry Tudor and J.M. Tudor, Cambridge UP, 1998, pp. 159–73.Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Beacon Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. “The Miracle of Monism.” Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, Oxford UP, 2012, pp. 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Guyer, P. and Wood, A.W., Cambridge UP, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan, and Nersessian, Anahid. “Form and Explanation.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 43, no. 3, Spring 2017, pp. 650–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan, and Nersessian, Anahid. “Forms and Explanations.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 44, no. 1, Autumn 2017, pp. 164–74.Google Scholar
Kraus, Chris. Where Art Belongs. Semiotext(e), 2011.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton UP, 2015.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. “Still Polemicizing after All hese Years.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 44, no. 1, Autumn 2017, pp. 129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Marjorie. “What Is New Formalism?” PMLA, vol. 122, no. 2, 2007, pp. 558–69.Google Scholar
Lezra, Jacques, and Blake, Liza. Lucretius and Modernity: Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucretius Carus, Titus. On the Nature of Things. Translated by Rouse, W.H.D., revised by Smith, Martin F., Harvard UP, 1924. Loeb Classical Library 181.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Critique of the Gotha Program. Selected Writings, edited by Simon, Lawrence W., Hackett Publishing, 1994, pp. 315–32.Google Scholar
McGinn, Colin. “Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem?” Mind, vol. 98, no. 391, 1989, pp. 349–66, doi:10 .1093/mind/XCVIII.391.349.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. U of Minnesota P, 2013.Google Scholar
Nealon, Christopher. “Infinity for Marxists.” Mediations, vol. 28, no. 2, 2015, pp. 47–63, www.mediationsjournal.org/articles/ininity-for-marxists.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V.O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays, 2nd ed., rev. ed., Harvard UP, 1980, pp. 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Translated by Rose, Julie, U of Minnesota P, 1999.Google Scholar
Ross, Kristin. Communal Luxury: The Political Imaginary of the Paris Commune. Verso, 2016.Google Scholar
van Riel, Raphael, and Gulick, Robert Van. “Scientific Reduction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2014, plato.stanford .edu/entries/ scientific-reduction/.Google Scholar