Article contents
That Which Is Casually Called a Language
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
Abstract
How do we know where languages begin and where they end? It is widely assumed that languages exist as discrete, distinct entities, an idea that forms the basis of mono- and multilingualism, as well as of source and target languages in translation theory. What created that clear-cut division between languages? I argue that our current conception of language was invented as part of the process of the creation of the nation-state. The idea of a language, and therefore of translation, was a product of nation-state formation that required the construction of boundaries to divide homogeneous territories, peoples, and their languages. The Stammbaum model of linguistic filiation emerged as part of the same politicized ideology of modernity. Against this, I consider the alternative model of language mixture, which conceptualizes language as a transformative process of interaction without boundaries and challenges ideas of a language and of translation.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- PMLA , Volume 131 , Issue 5: Special Topic: Literature in the World , October 2016 , pp. 1207 - 1221
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2016
References
Works Cited
- 11
- Cited by