Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:19:12.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure and Dramatic Technique in Gide's Saül and Le Roi Candaule

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

D. M. Church*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.

Abstract

Two early Gide plays, Saül and Le Roi Candaule, represent a revolt against the realistic and naturalistic theater of the nineteenth century, yet they cannot be completely classified as symbolist because of Gide's insistence on the importance of psychologically particularized characters. Character is a major consideration that determines the dramatic quality, the structure, and the techniques of the plays. Saul, which bears many superficial resemblances to Shakespeare's plays, is completely dominated by the figure of the King. The play's structure reminds one of a fugue; it is more an intellectual artifice than a dramatic development. In Le Roi Candaule, as in Saül, the title figure is completely dominant to the point that other characters seem mere puppets. In each play the action hinges on a voluntary self-destructive decision made by the protagonist. But the dramatic effects are due largely to Gide's interesting, yet not always masterful, use of theatrical tricks. In spite of their obvious flaws, these plays deserve consideration as forerunners in the twentieth-century French trend toward using theater as theater to express meaningful ideas about the nature of man.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 84 , Issue 6 , October 1969 , pp. 1639 - 1643
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Theater of André Gide: Evolution of a Moral Philosopher (Baltimore, Md., 1953), p. 87.

2 André Gide, l'insaisissable Protêe (Paris, 1953), p. 122.

3 “Lettres à Angèle,” in Œuvres complètes (Paris, 1933), iii, 200.

4 “L'Evolution du théâtre,” in Œuvres complètes, iv, 214–215.

5 “L'Evolution du théâtre,” p. 205.

6 “L'Evolution du théâtre,” p. 209.

7 Journal, 1880–1939 (Paris, 1939), p. 1065.

8 La Farce est jouée (New York, 1942), p. 206.

9 See his André Gide (Alger, 1938), pp. 187–188.

10 Brée, p. 145.

11 Paul C. Berger, André Gide: Mensch und Werk (Coburg, 1949), p. 102.

12 “Préface à la première édition du Roi Candaule,” in Théâtre complet (Neuchâtel and Paris, 1947), ii, 33. 13 See especially Hytier, p. 196.

14 Théâtre complet, ii, 104.

15 McLaren, p. 90.

16 See above, n. 2.