Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:58:00.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Provincializing Medieval Europe: Mandeville's Cosmopolitan Utopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Karma Lochrie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The excellence of things is in the middle.

—Aristotle, quoted in Mandeville

Utopia has always been about place, the Greek roots of this word squinting wryly at the dual possibilities of a “happy place” and “no place.” Even generically, the term utopia implies its own place, not as ambiguously poised between the ideal and “the not at all” but as a point of origin—a sign of incipient modernity—to which the medieval becomes “no place for utopia.” Utopia thus marks both the geographic space of possibility and difference and the genealogical space of transition from premodernity to modernity, so the historical narrative goes. Like most historical narratives with a fondness for originary designs, this one has the effect of provincializing the Middle Ages as that time before modernity when utopianism was not possible, or alternatively when it was possible only as a religious ideal that differed fundamentally from early modern secular utopianism and Thomas More's seminal text. The Middle Ages is relegated in histories of utopia to the realm of “the before”—before secularism, before modernity, before geography. Medieval antecedents of early modern utopianism are shunted off into that “inert, sealed off space before the movement of history.” The Middle Ages is out of step with modernity to the same extent that it is out of place in utopian studies. The irony of the “middleness” of the Middle Ages is that, contra Aristotle, it is marked not by excellence but by the inertia of premodernity—it is the “excluded middle,” if you will.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 124 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 592 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aristotle. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Ed. and Trans. Roger Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Braude. “The Sons of Noah and the Construction of Ethnic and Geographical Identities in the Medieval and Early Modern Periods.” William and Mary Quarterly 3rd ser. 54.1 (1997): 103–42. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, Brome. The Antipodes. Ed. Kastan, David Scott and Proudfoot, Richard. New York: Routledge, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Dipesh, Chakrabarty. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Janet, Coleman. “The Continuity of Utopian Thought in the Middle Ages: A Reassessment.” Vivarium 20.1 (1982): 1–23. Print.Google Scholar
Joan, Copjec. Imagine There's No Woman: Ethics and Sublimation. Cambridge: MIT P, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Park, Katharine. Wonders and the Order of Nature. New York: Zone, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Kathleen, Davis. “Time behind the Veil: The Media, the Middle Ages, and Orientalism Now.” The Postcolonial Middle Ages. Ed. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. New York: Palgrave, 2000. 105–22. Print.Google Scholar
Christiane, Deluz. Jean de Mandeville: Le livre des merveilles du monde. Paris: CNRS, 2000. Print. L'Institut de Recherche et d'Histoire des Textes 31.Google Scholar
Ewan, Fernie. Shame in Shakespeare. New York: Routledge, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
F., Graus “Social Utopias in the Middle Ages.” Past and Present 38.1 (1967): 3–19. Print.Google Scholar
Stephen, Greenblatt. Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Geraldine, Heng. Empire of Magic: Medieval Romance and the Politics of Cultural Fantasy. New York: Columbia UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Higgins, Iain Macleod. Writing East: The “Travels” of Sir John Mandeville. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1997. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharon, Kinoshita. “Deprovincializing the Middle Ages: Discrepant Medievalisms.” Worldings: World Literature, Field Imaginaries, Future Practices: Doing Cultural Studies in the Era of Globalization. Ed. Wilson, Rob and Watson, David. Santa Cruz: New Pacific, 2007. 75–89. Print.Google Scholar
Andrew, Linklater. “Distant Suffering and Cosmopolitan Obligations.” International Politics 44.1 (2007): 19–36. Print.Google Scholar
John, Mandeville. Mandeville's Travels, Translated from the French of Jean d'Outremeuse. Edited from Ms. Cotton Titus c. XVI, in the British Museum. 1919–23. Ed. Hamelius, P. 2 vols. London: Oxford UP, 1960–61. Print. Early English Text Soc. os. 153–54.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Pollock, et al. “Cosmopolitanisms.” Public Culture 12.3 (2000): 577–89. Print.Google Scholar
Michael, Uebel. Ecstatic Transformation: On the Uses of Alterity in the Middle Ages. New York: Palgrave, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Wegner, Phillip E. Imaginary Communities: Utopia, the Nation, and the Spatial Histories of Modernity. Berkeley: U of California P, 2002. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Woodward. “Reality, Symbolism, Time, and Space in Medieval World Maps.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 75.4 (1985): 510–21. Print.Google Scholar