Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:03:23.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professional Notes and Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
PMLA , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , May 1970 , pp. 544 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note 1 in page 548 To quote the MLA Newsletter, i, ii (May 1969), 1, a welcome indication of hope in the MLA and the incentive for submitting this paper. The references to “English professors” throughout the paper are for brevity, and not for exclusion of modern language professors from the challenge.

Note 2 in page 550 The points presented here rather informally would not have been produced or put together at all without the stimulation provided by a discussion group at the August 1969 meeting of the Society for Religion in Higher Education. Professor Henry Clark of the Department of Religion, Duke University, organized the morning Group on “Change in Professional Associations,” for which this paper was drafted. The other resourceful participants were: William Moore, Carnegie Commission on Higher Education; Anne Murphy, Dept. of Political Science, Florida Presbyterian Coll.; Edward Ordman, Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of Kentucky; Dan Rich, Dept. of Political Science, MIT; and Paul Ward, Executive Secretary, American Historical Association.

Note 1 in page 558 The various phases of the project have been amply chronicled in the seven Newsletters of the Portuguese Language Development Group, issued in Austin, Jan. 1964 through May 1967. PLDG Newsletters Nos. 1 and 2 (Jan. and Sept. 1964) were reprinted in Hispania, 48 (May 1964), 379–381, and No. 4 (Dec. 1964), 819–823. See also Henry W. Hoge, “The Portuguese Language Development Group,” Linguistic Reporter, 7, ii (1964), 1–2; and an article with identical title by Fred P. Ellison, in MLJ, 49 (1965), 433–434, See also Ellison, “Portuguese as a Foreign Language,” Portugal and Brazil in Transition, ed. R. S. Sayers (Minneapolis, Minn., 1968), pp. 75–89, 342, and “The Teaching of Portuguese in the United States,” Handbook on the Teaching of Spanish and Portuguese, ed. D. D. Walsh (Boston, 1969), pp. 235–249. The trial edition of Modern Portuguese has been reviewed by C. Malcolm Batchelor, in MLJ, 51 (1967), 506–508.