Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:31:42.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidential Address 2007: The Scandal of Literacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Michael Holquist
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As I was preparing to leave for Chicago, I read the latest PMLA special-topic issue, Remapping Genre, coordinated by Wai Chee Dimock and Bruce Robbins. So, impressed once again by the power of the concept of genre, I begin by remarking the form of what I am doing here tonight. That genre is, of course, something called an MLA presidential address. There have been 116 such addresses since 1883, when forty professors met at Columbia to found the MLA. As the 117th president in this long line, I prepared for this evening by doing a small study of what my predecessors have written for the occasion over more than a century. Such a study, I might add, is very much part of the genre. Certain features of the canon are persistent enough to catch the eye of even the most casual student of the form. The dominant structure of an MLA presidential address is an arrangement that goes back at least to the Sophists: it is an argument arranged as a contest between two antitheses. Over the years, the dichotomies have changed, but the template of binary opposition has remained improbably constant.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 123 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 568 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Hans, Aarsleff. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1982.Google Scholar
Roland, Barthes. “To Write: An Intransitive Verb?” 1966. The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man. Ed. Macksey, Richard and Donato, Eugenio. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1970. 134–44.Google Scholar
Black, J. A. “The Babylonian Grammatical Tradition: The First Grammars of ‘Sumerian.‘” Transactions of the Philological Society 87 (1989): 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavafy, C. P. “Ithaka.” C. P. Cavafy: Collected Poems. Trans. Keeley, Edmund and George Savidis, Philip Sherrard. Ed. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1992. 36–37.Google Scholar
Caleb, Crain. “Twilight of the Books.” New Yorker 24 Dec. 2007. 29 May 2008 <http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2007/12/24/071224crat_atlarge_crain>.Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. “Grammatology.” The World's Writing Systems. Ed. Daniels, and Bright, William. New York: Oxford UP, 1996. 1–18.Google Scholar
Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2005: The Quality Imperative. 2004. United Nations Educ., Scientific, and Cultural Organization. 22 Apr. 2008 <http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=35939>..>Google Scholar
Marija, Gimbutas. The Civilization of the Goddess: The World of Old Europe. San Francisco: Harper, 1991.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Essay on the Origin of Language. Trans. Gode, Alexander. Two Essays on the Origin of Language: Rousseau and Herder. Trans. Moran, John H. and Gode, . Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1966. 87–166.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and Its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species. Ed. Losonsky, Michael. Trans. Peter Heath. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Franz, Kafka. “In der Strafkolonie.” Das Urteil und andere Erzählungen. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1987. 98–126.Google Scholar
Franz, Kafka. “In the Penal Colony.” Trans. Muir, Willa and Muir, Edwin. The Complete Stories. By Kafka. Ed. Glatzer, Nahum N. New York: Schocken, 1971. 140–67.Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. “Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?” 1784. Projekt Gutenberg-DE. Spiegel Online. 1994–2007. 20 Mar. 2008 <http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/?id=5&xid=1366&kapitel=1#gb_found>.Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. The Conflict of the Faculties. Trans. Gregor, Mary J. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1992.Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Key Findings. Natl. Assessment of Adult Literacy, Natl. Center for Educ. Statistics, United States Dept. of Educ. 18 Mar. 2008 <http://nces.ed.gov/naal/kf_demographics.asp>..>Google Scholar
Matthew, Kirschenbaum. “How Reading Is Being Reimagined.” Chronicle Review 7 Dec. 2002: B20.Google Scholar
Steven, Levy. “The Future of Reading.” Newsweek 26 Nov. 2007: 57–64.Google Scholar
Literacy Topic. 9 Oct. 2007. UNESCO Inst. for Statistics. 18 Mar. 2008 <http://www.uis.unesco.org/>. Path: Literacy..+Path:+Literacy.>Google Scholar
Piotr, Michalowski. “Mesopotamian Cuneiform.” The World's Writing Systems. Ed. Daniels, Peter T. and Bright, William. New York: Oxford UP, 1996. 33–72.Google Scholar
Remapping Genre. Spec. issue of PMLA 122.5 (2007): 1369–704.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. Writings in General Linguistics. Trans. Sanders, Carol and Pires, Matthew. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Bessarat, Denise. From Counting to Cuneiform. Austin: U of Texas P, 1991. Vol. 1 of Before Writing. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Special Millennium Issue. PMLA 115.7 (2000): 1713–2096.Google Scholar
The World Factbook. 15 May 2008. Central Intelligence Agency, United States. 29 May 2008 <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/>. Path: United States; People..+Path:+United+States;+People.>Google Scholar
Theodore, Ziolkowski. German Romanticism and Its Institutions. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1990.Google Scholar