Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:21:23.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Not So Well Attached

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Faultfinding is the fault that Rita Felski's The Limits of Critique attributes to literary criticism. Faultfinding is also, of course, what Felski's book spends most of its time doing. Had it not abandoned itself so completely to faultfinding, its central insight might have led it to do more interesting things. (The fact that these more interesting things are already being done by much socially engaged criticism is one obvious weakness of her argument, which puffs itself up by expanding its range of targets so as to take in nearly the whole profession and then, sensing a challenge, steps back in mock horror so as to suggest, “No, of course, I didn't mean that!”) As an example of these alternative, nonfaultfinding versions of critique, the book might have tried to explore the reasons the humanities are as susceptible as they are to the holier-than-thou self-righteousness that Felski both accuses and, however reluctantly, also personifies.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Best, Stephen, and Marcus, Sharon, editors. Representations, vol. 108, no. 1, Fall 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Sebastian. What Is Global History? Princeton UP, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. U of Chicago P, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Scott, and Mitchell, Don. “The Nature of Things: Dead Labor, Nonhuman Actors, and the Persistence of Marxism.” Antipode, vol. 36, no. 4, 2004, pp. 687705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity, vol. 3, no. 4, 1996, pp. 228–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 30, no. 2, Winter 2004, pp. 225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, George. “Exporting Jihad.” The New Yorker, 28 Mar. 2016, pp. 3851.Google Scholar
Rooney, Ellen. “Live Free or Describe: The Reading Effect and the Persistence of Form.” Differences, vol. 21, no. 3, 2010, pp. 112–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey J.The New Modesty in Literary Criticism.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 5 Jan. 2015, www.chronicle.com/article/The-New-Modesty-in-Literary/150993.Google Scholar