Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:48:12.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narratology in the Twenty-First Century: The Cognitive Approach to Narrative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Monika Fludernik
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Literary theory in the twentieth century was heavily influenced by linguistics. The structuralist model that set the waves of literary theories in motion originated in Saussurean linguistics and its Jakobsonian elaborations. One could argue that until the 1980s all literary theory, and all linguistics for that matter, was based on an analysis of langue, or the system of language or literature or text, to the detriment of parole, the practices, contexts, and negotiations of speakers, writers, and readers. The structuralist model, with its theoretical expansion of close-reading practices, already entrenched in the wake of the New Criticism, generalized the frame of mind that was soon to become the bogeyman of poststructuralist and cultural studies attacks. The formula could be summarized as No history, no ethics, no themes, no aesthetics, and no context—period.

Type
Thinking the Future
Information
PMLA , Volume 125 , Issue 4: Special Topic Literary Criticism for the Twenty-First Century , October 2010 , pp. 924 - 930
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adler, Hans, and Gross, Sabine. “Adjusting the Frame: Comments on Cognitivism and Literature.” Poetics Today 23.3 (2002): 195–220. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edna, Andrews. Markedness Theory: The Union of Asymmetry and Semiosis in Language. Durham: Duke UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Derek, Attridge. The Singularity of Literature. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Benedict, Barbara M. Framing Feeling: Sentiment and Style in English Prose Fiction, 1745–1800. New York: AMS, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Bortolussi, Marisa, and Dixon, Peter. Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Claude, Bremond, ed. Thematics: New Approaches. Albany: State U of New York P, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Seana, and Oakley, Todd, eds. Conceptual Blending. Spec. issue of Cognitive Linguistics 11.3–4 (2001): 175–358. Print.Google Scholar
Coulson, Seana, and Oakley, Todd, eds. Conceptual Blending Theory. Spec. issue of Journal of Pragmatics 37.10 (2005): 1507–742. Print.Google Scholar
Jonathan, Culler. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge, 1975. Print.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio R. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. San Diego: Harcourt, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Daneš, Frantisek. “Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text.” Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Ed. Daneš, . Prague: Academia, 1974. 106–28. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Davies. Aesthetics and Literature. New York: Continuum, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Davis, Todd F., ed. Mapping the Ethical Turn: A Reader in Ethics, Culture, and Literary Theory. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel Clement. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Jens, Eder. “Narratology and Cognitive Reception Theories.” What Is Narratology? Questions and Answers regarding the Status of a Theory. Ed. Kindt, Tom and Müller, Hans-Harald. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2003. 277–301. Print.Google Scholar
Emory, Elliott, ed. Aesthetics in a Multicultural Age. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. “A Mechanism of Creativity.” Poetics Today 20.3 (1999): 397–418. Print.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. “Rethinking Metaphor.” The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Ed. Ray Gibbs, Jr. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. 53–66. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic, 2002. Print.
Paul, Feyerabend. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso, 1975. Print.Google Scholar
Monika, Fludernik. Towards a “Natural” Narratology. London: Routledge, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Joanna, Gavins. “The Year's Work in Stylistics 2008.” Language and Literature 18.4 (2009): 367–83. Print.Google Scholar
Gavins, Joanna, and Steen, Gerard, eds. Cognitive Poetics in Practice. London: Routledge, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. “Evaluating Contemporary Models of Figurative Language Understanding.” Metaphor and Symbol 16.3–4 (2001): 317–33. Print.Google Scholar
Andrew, Gibson. Postmodernity, Ethics and the Novel. London: Routledge, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Gleßgen, Martin-Dietrich, and Lebsanft, Franz, eds. Alte und neue Philologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1997. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst H. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London, Phaedon, 1960. Print.Google Scholar
Chanita, Goodblatt. “Adding an Empirical Dimension to the Study of Poetic Metaphor.” Journal of Literary Semantics 30.2 (2001): 167–80. Print.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew, Rainsford, Dominic, and Woods, Tim, eds. The Ethics in Literature. London: Macmillan, 1999. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Herman, ed. Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences. Stanford: Center for the Study of Lang. and Information, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm. Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists. New York: Routledge, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm. The Mind and Its Stories: Narrative Universals and Human Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manfred, Jahn. “Frames, Preferences, and the Reading of Third-Person Narratives: Towards a Cognitive Narratology.” Poetics Today 18.4 (1997): 441–68. Print.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., ed. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzanne, Keen. Empathy and the Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, Herrmann, Tanja, Pietsch, Lukas, and Wagner, Susanne. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects: Agreement, Gender, Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton, 2005. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, and Upton, Clive, eds. The British Isles. Berlin: Mouton, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoltán, Kövecses. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Martin, Kreiswirth. “Tell Me a Story: The Narrativist Turn in the Human Sciences.” Constructive Criticism: The Human Sciences in the Age of Theory. Ed. Kreiswirth, and Carmichael, Thomas. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1995. 61–87. Print.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George P. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan, Loesberg. A Return to Aesthetics: Autonomy, Indifference, and Postmodernism. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Christine, Lubkoll, ed. “Ethical Turn”? Geisteswissenschaften in neuer Verantwortung. Munich: Fink, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian, Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, and Smith, Nicholas. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. The Ethics of Reading. New York: Columbia UP, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “Is There an Ethics of Reading?” Reading Narrative: Form, Ethics, Ideology. Ed. Phelan, James. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1989. 79–101. Print.Google Scholar
Christopher, Nash, ed. Narrative in Culture: The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy, and Literature. London: Routledge, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Terttu, Nevalainen. An Introduction to Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Newton, Adam Zachary. Narrative Ethics. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Menakhem, Perry. “Literary Dynamics: How the Order of a Text Creates Its Meaning.” Poetics Today 1.1–2 (1979): 35–64, 311–61. Print.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, and Steen, Francis F., eds. Literature and the Cognitive Revolution. Spec. issue of Poetics Today 23.1 (2002): 1–182. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nancy, Roberts. Schools of Sympathy: Gender and Identification through the Novel. Montreal: McGill-Queen's UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Jenefer, Robinson. Deeper Than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. Oxford: Clarendon, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Siegfried J. Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literature. Trans. Robert de Beaugrande. Hamburg: Buske, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena, and Culpeper, Jonathan, eds. Cognitive Stylistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2002. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, Siebers. The Ethics of Criticism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Stanzel, Franz K. Narrative Situations in the Novel: Tom Jones, Moby-Dick, The Ambassadors, Ulysses. Trans. Pusack, J. P. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1971. Print. Trans. of Die typischen Erzählsituationen im Roman: Dargestellt an Tom Jones, Moby-Dick, The Ambassadors, Ulysses u.a. Vienna: Braumüller, 1955.Google Scholar
Stanzel, Franz K. A Theory of Narrative. Trans. Charlotte Goedsche. Pref. Paul Hernadi. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Gerard, Steen. Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage: A Methodological Analysis of Theory and Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Gerard, Steen. “Metaphor and Language and Literature: A Cognitive Perspective.” Language and Literature 9.3 (2000): 261–77. Print.Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard., ed. Metaphor Identification. Spec. issue of Language and Literature 11.1 (2002): 5–90. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerard, Steen. Understanding Metaphor in Literature: An Empirical Approach. London: Longman, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Meir, Sternberg. “Universals of Narrative and Their Cognitivist Fortunes.” Poetics Today 24.2–3 (2003): 297–395, 517–638. Print.Google Scholar
Peter, Stockwell. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Rei, Terada. Feeling in Theory: Emotion after the “Death of the Subject.” Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Frank, Trommler, ed. Thematics Reconsidered: Essays in Honor of Horst S. Daemmrich. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Reuven, Tsur. Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. 1992. 2nd ed. Brighton: Sussex Acad., 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Mark, Turner. “The Cognitive Study of Art, Language, and Literature.” Poetics Today 23.1 (2002): 9–20. Print.Google Scholar
Mark, Turner. The Literary Mind. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Mark, Turner. “The Mind Is an Autocatalytic Vortex.” The Literary Mind. Ed. Schläger, Jürgen and Stedman, Gesa. Tübingen: Narr, 2008. 13–43. Print.Google Scholar
Mark, Turner. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Mark, Turner. “The Way We Imagine.” Imaginative Minds. Ed. Roth, Ilona. London: Oxford UP; British Acad., 2007. 213–36. Print.Google Scholar
Zerweck, Bruno. “Der cognitive turn in der Erzähltheorie. Kognitive und ‚natürliche' Narratologie.” Neue Ansätze in der Erzähltheorie. Ed. Nünning, Ansgar and Nünning, Vera. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2002. 219–42. Print.Google Scholar
Zunshine, Lisa. Strange Concepts and the Stories They Make Possible: Cognition, Culture, Narrative. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Zunshine, Lisa. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar