Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:19:25.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Matthew Arnold and Sainte-Beuve

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Arnold Whitridge*
Affiliation:
Yale University

Extract

In a letter to Cardinal Newman, written when he was fifty years old, Matthew Arnold mentions four people from whom he is conscious of having learnt—Goethe, Wordsworth, Sainte-Beuve, and Newman himself. Arnold goes on to explain that he does not mean merely receiving a strong impression but actually acquiring “habits, methods, ruling ideas, which are constantly with me.” Much as he admired Newman, Goethe, and Wordsworth, Arnold's literary fame owes more to Sainte-Beuve than to any other one man. The two volumes of Essays in Criticism, which contain Arnold's most interesting and enduring prose, are a lasting monument to the force of Sainte-Beuve's ideas. Posterity would gladly exchange Arnold's attempts to rationalize religion for a few more volumes of literary essays, but unfortunately, much as he admired Sainte-Beuve, he was too much of an Englishman to follow in Sainte-Beuve's footsteps. Sir Walter Raleigh used to maintain that Arnold was thoroughly unEnglish in his tastes and that he invariably condemned everything that was characteristically British. If that were true he would not have yearned for England as he did whenever he went abroad. Arnold had an unerring eye for national defects, but no man could care more deeply for the welfare of his country. Beneath the gay exterior of the man of the world Arnold was serious to the extent of didacticism. In the letters to his mother he is continually saying that he thinks such and such an article “will do good.” Sainte-Beuve never spared himself in the Causeries du Lundi, but he probably worried more about giving a faithful portrait than about “doing good.”

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 1938 , pp. 303 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Unpublislied Letters of Matthew Arnold, edited by Arnold Whitridge (Yale University Press, 1923), p. 65.

2 Sir Walter Raleigh, Some Authors (Oxford, 1923), p. 305.

3 Letters of M. Arnold, edited by G. W. E. Russell, i, 90.

4 Sainte-Beuve, Correspondance (Paris, 1877), i, 283.

5 Cf. “Letters from Charles and Arthur Neate to Sainte-Beuve,” Revue de la Littérature Comparée, (October-December, 1933), 686–740.

6 Chateaubriand et son groupe littéraire (Paris, 1861), i, 356.

7 Nouveaux Lundis, viii, 117.

8 Ibid., ix, 250.

9 Quoted by Matthew Arnold in Discourses in America, p. 38.

10 Quoted by A. Fryer Powell, “Sainte-Beuve and Matthew Arnold” in The French Quarterly (September, 1921), iii, 153.—I have not been able to trace this letter in Sainte-Beuve's correspondence.

11 M. Arnold, Essays in Criticism, First Series, p. 48.

12 Idem, Second Series, p. 4.

13 Sainte-Beuve, Causeries du Lundi, i, 332.

14 M. Arnold, Essays in Criticism, First Series, p. 52.

15 Sainte-Beuve, Causeries du Lundi, xi, 519.

16 Letters of Matthew Arnold, i, 225.

17 Ibid., 234.

18 Sainte-Beuve, Portraits Littéraires, iii, 546.

19 Sainte-Beuve, Causeries du Lundi, xiv, 77.

20 M. Arnold, Discourses in America, p. 39.—TheNotebooks of Matthew Arnold, edited by Howard F. Lowry and shortly to be published by the Oxford University Press, contain further proof of Arnold's reading and rereading of the Causeries.