Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:49:55.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Horologe of Time”: Periodization in History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

David Blackbourn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Everyone has an interest in time, but historians are interested in it professionally. they have been remarkably fecund in devising ways to carve up and label the mysterious workings of time. They have named it after rulers or other leaders (what the great French historian of the Annales school Marc Bloch referred to tartly as “stumbling from reign to reign” [177]), so that students encounter periods called the Napoleonic, Jacksonian, Victorian, Meiji, and Wilhelmine, to give just a few examples from the nineteenth century I know best. Then there are the centuries, the building blocks of so many survey courses and textbooks that one can only wonder at the powerful hold of the decimal system on the historical imagination. Not least, of course, we find history divided into conceptual units. These may be variations on ancient and modern; they may be periods defined by a body of ideas and practices (Renaissance, Enlightenment) or by overarching political and social developments (the revolutionary era, the age of empire). Once we enter the terrain of conceptually defined eras, titles given by historians are limited only by the number of abstract nouns that can be employed after the phrase “age of,” starting with “anxiety” and continuing through the alphabet.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 127 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 301 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Acton, Lord [John Edward Emerich Dalberg]. Lectures on Modern History. London: Macmillan, 1906. Print.Google Scholar
Armitage, David, and Subramanyam, Sanjay, eds. The Age of Revolutions in Global Context, c. 1760–1840. New York: Palgrave, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayly, Christopher A. The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914. Malden: Blackwell, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Blackbourn, David. The Long Nineteenth Century: A History of Germany, 1780–1918. New York: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Blackbourn, David, and Eley, Geoff. The Peculiarities of German History. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1984. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Marc. The Historian's Craft. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1954. Print.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. Trans. Siân Reynolds. 2 vols. London: Collins, 1972–73. Print. Trans. of La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l'époque de Philippe II. 1949.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. “On History.” 1830. Thomas Carlyle: Selected Writings. Ed. Shelston, Alan. London: Penguin, 1971. 51–58. Print.Google Scholar
Christian, David. Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. Berkeley: U of California P, 2004. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Jonathan C. D. English Society, 1688–1832: Ideology, Social Structure, and Political Practice during the Old Regime. New York: Cambridge UP, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall, ed. Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. London: Picador, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Garrett, David T. Shadows of Empire: The Indian Nobility of Cusco, 1750–1825. New York: Cambridge UP, 2005. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. The Age of Revolution, 1789–1848. London: Weidenfeld, 1962. Print.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Trans. Presner, Todd Samuel et al. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. “Über die Theoriebedürftigkeit der Geschichtswissenschaft.” Theorie der Geschichtswissenschaft und Praxis des Geschichtsunterrichts. Ed. Conze, Werner. Stuttgart: Klett, 1972. 10–28. Print.Google Scholar
Landers, John. “Age Patterns of Mortality in London during the ‘Long Eighteenth Century.‘” Social History of Medicine 20.3 (2007): 483–503. Print.Google Scholar
Lukacs, John. Five Days in London: May 1940. New Haven: Yale UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Macmillan, Margaret. Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World. New York: Random, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas, The Magic Mountain. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1960. Print.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. Der Zauberberg. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1960. Print.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlev J. K. The Weimar Republic: The Crisis of Classical Modernity. London: Lane, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Wolfgang. Probleme deutscher Geschichte, 1495–1806. Stuttgart: Klett, 2001. Print. Vol. 9 of Gebhardt Handbuch der Deutschen Geschichte. 24 vols.Google Scholar
Revel, Jacques. Jeux d'échelles: La micro-analyse à l'expérience. Paris: Gallimard, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Smail, Daniel Lord. On Deep History and the Brain. Berkeley: U of California P, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Turner, Henry A. Hitler's Thirty Days to Power: January 1933. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Wahrman, Dror. The Making of the Modern Self. New Haven: Yale UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World-System. New York: Academic, 1974. Print.Google Scholar
Webster, James. “The 18th Century as a Music-Historical Period.” Eighteenth-Century Music 1.1 (2004): 47–60. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar