Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:18:26.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History, Postmodernism, and Louise Erdrich's Tracks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Nancy J. Peterson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The deconstruction of history by poststructuralists and some philosophers of history has occurred at the moment when women and indigenous peoples have begun to write their own historical accounts. Louise Erdrich's historical novel, Tracks, brings into focus the necessity and the difficulties of writing Native American history in a postmodern epoch. The novel addresses two crucial issues: the referential value of history (If it is impossible to know the past fully, is it impossible to know the past at all?) and the status of history as narrative (If history is just a story, how is it possible to discriminate between one story and another?). Erdrich's novel suggests the need for indigenous histories to counter the dominant narrative, in which the settling of America is “progress,” but also works toward a new historicity that is neither a simple return to historical realism nor a passive acceptance of postmodern historical fictionality.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 109 , Issue 5 , October 1994 , pp. 982 - 994
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Allen, Paula Gunn The Sacred Hoop: Recovering the Feminine in American Indian Traditions. Boston: Beacon, 1986.Google Scholar
Anderson, Linda “The Re-imagining of History in Contemporary Women's Fiction.” Plotting Change: Contemporary Women's Fiction. Ed. Anderson. London: Arnold, 1990. 129–12.Google Scholar
Attridge, Derek, Bennington, Geoff, and Young, Robert, eds Post-structuralism and the Question of History. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Barnouw, Victor Wisconsin Chippewa Myths and Tales. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1977.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland “Historical Discourse.” Introduction to Structuralism. Ed. Lane, Michael. New York: Basic, 1970. 145–14.Google Scholar
Camp, Gregory S “Working Out Their Own Salvation: The Allotment of Land in Severalty and the Turtle Mountain Chippewa Band, 1870–1920.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 14.2 (1990): 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, Susan Pérez “Postmodernism, Native American Literature, and the Real: The Silko-Erdrich Controversy.” Massachusetts Review 32 (1991): 285–28.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques Of Grammatology. Trans. Spivak, G. C. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Doctorow, E. L “False Documents.” E. L. Doctorow: Essays and Conversations. Ed. Trenner, Richard. Princeton: Ontario Review, 1983. 16–27.Google Scholar
Dorris, Michael “Indians on the Shelf.” Martin 98–105.Google Scholar
Erdrich, Louise The Beet Queen. New York: Henry Holt, 1986.Google Scholar
Erdrich, Louise The Bingo Palace. New York: Henry Holt, 1994.Google Scholar
Erdrich, Louise Love Medicine. 1984. Rev. ed. New York: Harper, 1993.Google Scholar
Erdrich, Louise Tracks. New York: Henry Holt, 1988.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, and Laub, Dori Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford “Post/Poststructuralist Feminist Criticism: The Politics of Recuperation and Negotiation.” New Literary History 22 (1991): 465–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuss, Diana “Getting into History.” Arizona Quarterly 45.4 (1989): 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, Bell Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston: South End, 1992.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda The Politics of Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Thomas M Introduction. The Limits of Theory. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1989. 1–22.Google Scholar
Kellner, Hans Language and Historical Representation: Getting the Story Crooked. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1989.Google Scholar
Krupat, Arnold Ethnocriticism: Ethnography, History, Literature. Berkeley: U of California P, 1992.Google Scholar
LaCapra, Dominick History and Criticism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois “The Différend, the Referent, and the Proper Name.” Trans. Georges Van Den Abbeele. Diacritics 14.3 (1984): 4–14.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Bennington, Geoff and Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.Google Scholar
Maristuen-Rodakowski, Julie “The Turtle Mountain Reservation in North Dakota: Its History As Depicted in Louise Erdrich's Love Medicine and Beet Queen.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 12.3 (1988): 33–48.Google Scholar
Martin, Calvin, ed The American Indian and the Problem of History. New York: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Mathes, Valerie Sherer “American Indian Women and the Catholic Church.” North Dakota History 47.4 (1980): 20–25.Google Scholar
Murray, Stanley N “The Turtle Mountain Chippewa, 1882–1905.” North Dakota History 51.1 (1984): 14–37.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich The Use and Abuse of History. Trans. Adrian Collins. Rev. ed. Indianapolis: Liberal Arts, 1957. Trans. of Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Historie für das Leben. 1874.Google Scholar
Rainwater, Catherine “Reading between Worlds: Narrativity in the Fiction of Louise Erdrich.” American Literature 62 (1990): 405–40.Google Scholar
Schneider, Mary Jane North Dakota Indians: An Introduction. Dubuque: Kendall, 1986.Google Scholar
Silberman, Robert “Opening the Text: Love Medicine and the Return of the Native American Woman.” Narrative Chance: Postmodern Discourse on Native American Indian Literatures. Ed. Vizenor, Gerald. Albuquerque: U of New Mexico P, 1989. 101–10.Google Scholar
Silko, Leslie Marmon “Here's an Odd Artifact for the Fairy-Tale Shelf.” Rev. of The Beet Queen, by Louise Erdrich. Impact/Albuquerque Journal 17 Oct. 1986: 10–11. Rpt. in Studies in American Indian Literatures 10.4 (1986): 177–17.Google Scholar
Stead, Deborah “Unlocking the Tale.” New York Times Book Review 2 Oct. 1988: 41.Google Scholar
Stripes, James D “The Problem(s) of (Anishinaabe) History in the Fiction of Louise Erdrich: Voices and Contexts.” Wicazo Sa Review 7.2 (1991): 26–33.Google Scholar
Trask, Haunani-Kay “From a Native Daughter.” Martin 171–17.Google Scholar
Vizenor, Gerald The People Named the Chippewa: Narrative Histories. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.Google Scholar
Vizenor, Gerald “Trickster Discourse: Comic Holotropes and Language Games.” Narrative Chance: Postmodern Discourse on Native American Indian Literatures. Ed. Vizenor. Albuquerque: U of New Mexico P, 1989. 187–211.Google Scholar
Waldman, Carl Atlas of the North American Indian. New York: Facts on File, 1985.Google Scholar
Washburn, Wilcomb E., ed History of Indian-White Relations. Ed. Sturtevant, William C. Washington: Smithsonian, 1988. Vol. 4 of Handbook of North American Indians.Google Scholar
Weil, Simone The Need for Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties toward Mankind. New York: Putnam's, 1952.Google Scholar
White, Hayden “Getting out of History.” Diacritics 12.3 (1982): 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hayden Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Wong, Hertha D “Adoptive Mothers and Thrown-Away Children in the Novels of Louise Erdrich.” Narrating Mothers: Theorizing Maternal Subjectivities. Ed. Daly, Brenda O. and Reddy, Maureen T. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1991. 174–17.Google Scholar