Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:05:11.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Grammarian's Funeral”—A Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

J. M. Ariail
J. M. Ariail*
Affiliation:
Columbia College (S.C.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment and Criticism
Information
PMLA , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 1933 , pp. 954 - 956
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Harrington, V. C., Browning Studies (Boston, 1915), p. 99: “Note to l. 26 the comment, commentary written in the margin of the manuscripts. Learning is spoken of here figuratively as a book, and to go thoroughly one must read not only the text but the marginal comment.” I interpret, “Still there's the comment” not to be mastered, but to be made, and I do this because we are told that the Grammarian later settled hoti's business and gave us the doctrine of the enclitic de. For the reference to Harrington, I am indebted to Dr. J. M. Booker of the University of North Carolina.

2 Harper's secondary meaning attached to the word could not, perhaps, have been known to the Grammarian; but Browning surely knew of Leibnitz. And Browning, not the students of the Grammarian, is using the word conscious of the double meaning.

3 E. A. Andrews and S. Stoddard, A Grammar of the Latin Language, 58th ed. (Boston, 1856), pp. 32–34.—It may be presumed from the number of editions of this book that it summed up Latin scholarship upon this subject at about the date of the poem.

4 Wm. Bingham, A Grammar of the Latin Language, revised by W. G. McCabe (Philadelphia, 1884).

5 Charles E. Bennett, A Latin Grammar, rev. ed. (Boston, 1916).

6 George M. Lane, A Latin Grammar, rev. ed. (New York, 1926).

7 It may be argued that tussis is no great crux. This is true, but the Grammarian would fain eat up the feast—“even to the crumbs.” What could better illustrate this passion than an unobtrusive but nice and persistent point in grammar?

8 That Browning gave full thought to what he was doing, see his letter explaining the “doctrine” of De, Student's Cambridge Edition of poems (Boston, 1895), p. 1020.