Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:48:28.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Formation of the American Humanist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Leo Spitzer*
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University

Extract

It Happens occasionally that, inside or outside of my university, I am asked about possible replacements of emeriti in the humanities and when, as is quite frequently the case, I have to report that I have no suggestion to make, I meet with the surprised reaction: “How is that possible? There must exist among 150 million Americans at least one promising young man who one day may become what his predecessor was!” And often some promising young man on whose record achievements are still to be inscribed is indeed appointed by the faculties, with the result that after a few years his record is still pure and the faculty decides to accept him as a hope of the past. This question: why do we not find more easily today adequate successors to the world-renowned pleiad of American-born humanistic scholars we had in the previous generation, the group of Armstrong, Blondheim, Elliott Ford, Grandgent, Lang, Marden, Nitze, Northup, to mention only the medieval Romance field—this serious question I shall attempt to discuss, well aware that my audience may find answers different from my own, but confident also that I have carefully weighed the pros and cons of my opinions in the fourteen years of my American career.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , February 1951 , pp. 39 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An address given at the General Meeting of the Modern Language Association in New York, December 28, 19S0.

References

1 The telephone of the organizer is the deadly enemy of the desk of the scholar.

2 I have often thought that my confrères in this country suffer somehow in their mature age from the drawback of not having received in their early beginnings enough serious criticism from the masters in their fields. Pointed criticism is unfortunately too often considered in scholarly circles as ungentlemanly, as reminiscent of the rough manners traditionally associated with the mores of political campaigning.